ADVERTISEMENT

NIL changes coming

phoenix4nu

Assistant Head Coach
May 10, 2009
9,686
15,638
113
Starting a separate thread on this.

If the House settlement is approved following a court hearing on April 7, NIL as it exists today will change. Schools will be allowed to provide money directly to student-athletes through revenue sharing, with an annual cap of $20.5 million. Third parties who are “associated entities or individuals” (certain boosters and all collectives) will be allowed to provide NIL money to a student-athlete only for the actual business use of the student-athlete's name, image or likeness, and only at fair market value rates. Student-athletes will be required to disclose all NIL deals with third parties that are greater than $600. If the NIL deal is with a booster or collective, an entity will determine whether the amount paid exceeds fair market value. If it does, the NIL deal would be void, but could be renegotiated to a fair market value rate. A student-athlete would be able to appeal the decision through a neutral arbitration system.

This means that if the settlement is approved, big boosters and collectives would not be able to fund “pay-for-play” NIL deals, as they do now.

According to the Sports Illustrated article linked below, the Power 4 conferences have agreed to create a separate entity that would serve the following functions:

“First, it will oversee a cap management system, ensuring schools stay within the $20.5 million annual revenue-sharing limit. It will additionally establish an NIL clearinghouse, run by Deloitte, to assess the fair market value of NIL deals and prevent schools from using booster-backed collectives to bypass the cap. A new investigative and infractions unit will police violations, including tampering and salary cap circumvention. Penalties will include fines, revenue-share reductions, and suspensions for coaches and administrators. The power conferences believe this structure will prevent the chaos and unchecked spending wars that have defined the NIL era thus far.”

SI: Power Conferences to Take Over NIL Oversight as NCAA Forfeits Control

More details are provided here:
 
Last edited:
Fair market value? You are worth what someone is willing to pay you. That is your fair market value. Try to void my contract and I am suing your ass.

Enforcement? I’ll believe it when I see it.
I take fair market value as what other players similar positions ranking etc.. are making.
 
Fair market value? You are worth what someone is willing to pay you. That is your fair market value. Try to void my contract and I am suing your ass.

Enforcement? I’ll believe it when I see it.
this is typical "good in theory" legalize

wake me up when we have a CFB Player's Union and Greg Sankey (or whomever) is named College Football Commissioner

only then will meaningful, sustainable change take place
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerAlum92
Starting a separate thread on this.

If the House settlement is approved following a court hearing on April 7, NIL as it exists today will change. Schools will be allowed to provide money directly to student-athletes through revenue sharing, with an annual cap of $20.5 million. Third parties who are “associated entities or individuals” (certain boosters and all collectives) will be allowed to provide NIL money to a student-athlete only for the actual business use of the student-athlete's name, image or likeness, and only at fair market value rates. Student-athletes will be required to disclose all NIL deals with third parties that are greater than $600. If the NIL deal is with a booster or collective, an entity will determine whether the amount paid exceeds fair market value. If it does, the NIL deal would be void, but could be renegotiated to a fair market value rate. A student-athlete would be able to appeal the decision through a neutral arbitration system.

This means that if the settlement is approved, big boosters and collectives would not be able to fund “pay-for-play” NIL deals, as they do now.

According to the Sports Illustrated article linked below, the Power 4 conferences have agreed to create a separate entity that would serve the following functions:

“First, it will oversee a cap management system, ensuring schools stay within the $20.5 million annual revenue-sharing limit. It will additionally establish an NIL clearinghouse, run by Deloitte, to assess the fair market value of NIL deals and prevent schools from using booster-backed collectives to bypass the cap. A new investigative and infractions unit will police violations, including tampering and salary cap circumvention. Penalties will include fines, revenue-share reductions, and suspensions for coaches and administrators. The power conferences believe this structure will prevent the chaos and unchecked spending wars that have defined the NIL era thus far.”

SI: Power Conferences to Take Over NIL Oversight as NCAA Forfeits Control

More details are provided here:
Yeah, until some player finds a lawyer and sues the NCAA again for things not being unlimited. Then they'll cave again. There is no way to establish fair market value for a NIL deal because the popularity of the players is highly variable. Dylan Raiola endorsing a product demands more money than a 3rd string OL.
 
The NFL is not unlimited for team spending...why should college football be allowed to have no ceiling for team totals?
 
What are the actual steps in forming a players union and why would the players ever want to form one when they have the unlimited NIL model currently in place? Who has the authority to establish something like that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: scarletred
The NFL is not unlimited for team spending...why should college football be allowed to have no ceiling for team totals?
The NFL imposed a salary cap as part of collective bargaining agreement, on which the players' union signed off. It wasn't mandated by anyone outside of the league.
 
What are the actual steps in forming a players union and why would the players ever want to form one when they have the unlimited NIL model currently in place? Who has the authority to establish something like that?
For one, it would guarantee a minimum comp/benefits package for all players, which doesn’t exist today

Players have attempted to unionize multiple times already
 
For one, it would guarantee a minimum comp/benefits package for all players, which doesn’t exist today

Players have attempted to unionize multiple times already
I think having a designated pool of money, that is to be distributed by the school, would help in getting a union established. In those other attempts to unionize, the players weren't receiving actual compensation from the school, it was from 3rd parties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Before this happens I'd like to see (for pure chaos) a ultra wealthy booster at a no name school like Montana or Nevada outspend everyone on NIL and have a top ranked class and make the playoffs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT