Ok, I misinterpreted what part of my post you were nitpicking. I will address this drinking age issue without any political angle or preconceived notions on your experience vs my own.
A gun can be dangerous in the wrong hands, alchohol or any other recreational drug, vehicle, anything really can be detrimental based on the individual using it. I firmly believe any young person who is deemed capable of operating a vehicle, smoking cigarettes, and potentially dying for their country should be able to make the decision whether they can handle alchohol consumption. Not some suit telling them they can be drafted into the military, but they can't buy a freaking beer.
I don't want anybody handling a device or holding my life in their hands while under the influence.. That includes an 18 year old infantry unit in Kuwait, or a team of 50 year old surgeons in a hospital room.
I don't think I was nitpicking, just making statements from what I had experienced and read. I'm sorry you may have thought that.
I think the big part of the arguments of age and alcohol are 1. development in the brain is continuing until the mid 20's and the majority of it is younger than that and those younger years before 21 are even more critical and the brain is more vulnerable to alcohol during that time 2. statistically, the younger a person is when they start drinking, the greater chance there is for them to be alcoholics later, but I don't know what the critical age might be 3. I hear that statistically, adolescents and young adults have questionable judgement in more than one area of life, which is why, for instance, they get in more car accidents, which is why their insurance rates are much higher up until about age 26 and alcohol compromises their judgment even more, not just in driving
I guess I don't see what alcohol consumption has to do with serving in the military because percentage wise, very few people do join the military and it has been a choice since about 1973 (conscription ended) and about 75% of the male population these days don't even qualify one way or the other to be accepted in the military. That seems to mean they have some sort of problem in their lives. If you are saying (and I think you are) that if an 18 or 19 yo kid can serve in the military, then they should be able to drink. If that is the case, then, obviously, by law changes, all of the 18-19 yo would be able to drink.
Personally, I find that disturbing when I think that would potentially include the 75% that even the MILITARY thinks are already defective. Alcohol, I would think, certainly wouldn't improve THEIR perceived defects, whatever the military thinks they are.
Your statement about anything can be dangerous depending on who is using it has truth to it. The problem is that how does one legislate limiting access to alcohol to only the 18 and 19 year olds that can handle alcohol without being detrimental to themselves or others. There, obviously, is no test for that like there is, say for instance, a drivers license.
Are you saying it should be made available for only people of that age who are in the military, or everyone that age?
Most states, I believe, tried to lower the legal drinking age for some years, but, apparently, that didn't work out due to some bad experiences, l am guessing, and more medical evidence about brain development, as discussed above, was learned, and those laws were rescinded. thanks for the discussion