ADVERTISEMENT

Measles Info Part II

When I had measles in 1965 I had measles. I had bumps on my face and I think I may still have a little round scar on my face to this day if I look hard enough in the mirror. My brother who was a few years older had measles at the same time and probably got it from me. I got mumps from him a year later. Fortunately, back then we were only immunized for the really big killers like polio and small pox. We weren't given these huge "vaccination cocktails" for everything under the sun causing us to develop autism, psychosis and the need to change our genders. As I approach old age I have become much more tolerant of just about everybody. But I increasingly suspect people in the medical community, including my GP as being quacks, more motivated by politics, pharma kickbacks and group think than science. When my doctor wanted to put me on a statin to get my LDL from 99 to 70 I laughed in his face. I hate modern "medicine".
 
When I had measles in 1965 I had measles. I had bumps on my face and I think I may still have a little round scar on my face to this day if I look hard enough in the mirror. My brother who was a few years older had measles at the same time and probably got it from me. I got mumps from him a year later. Fortunately, back then we were only immunized for the really big killers like polio and small pox. We weren't given these huge "vaccination cocktails" for everything under the sun causing us to develop autism, psychosis and the need to change our genders. As I approach old age I have become much more tolerant of just about everybody. But I increasingly suspect people in the medical community, including my GP as being quacks, more motivated by politics, pharma kickbacks and group think than science. When my doctor wanted to put me on a statin to get my LDL from 99 to 70 I laughed in his face. I hate modern "medicine".
Group think is close. I’d call it a game of ‘Simon Says’. Hardly any docs do their own trials or even think for themselves. They just do whatever big brother says, after all, “he is the science”.

I’ve worked in hospital offices as a contractor, and have seen from a third party perspective exactly how every employee is basically force-indoctrinated from the top and it is surreal to witness live. Dystopian really.
 
Group think is close. I’d call it a game of ‘Simon Says’. Hardly any docs do their own trials or even think for themselves. They just do whatever big brother says, after all, “he is the science”.

I’ve worked in hospital offices as a contractor, and have seen from a third party perspective exactly how every employee is basically force-indoctrinated from the top and it is surreal to witness live. Dystopian really.
I guess you’re just going to ignore all the progress medicine made in the last hundred years treating pneumonia, cancer, childbirth complications, heart disease, heck even appendicitis-all based on science.
It’s all one big conspiracy designed just to screw you.
 
I guess you’re just going to ignore all the progress medicine made in the last hundred years treating pneumonia, cancer, childbirth complications, heart disease, heck even appendicitis-all based on science.
It’s all one big conspiracy designed just to screw you.
I am sure what “all the progress” and “science” really means anymore. I watched a piece on the history of the flu vaccine where they had data on number of deaths in older people before the vaccine and many years later wanted to do a study to show how affective it had been. Turned out the study showed the flu vaccine did NOT reduce deaths like was expected. They scrapped the data and kept it under wraps. I am sure there was some “science” involved in there somewhere.
 
I am sure what “all the progress” and “science” really means anymore. I watched a piece on the history of the flu vaccine where they had data on number of deaths in older people before the vaccine and many years later wanted to do a study to show how affective it had been. Turned out the study showed the flu vaccine did NOT reduce deaths like was expected. They scrapped the data and kept it under wraps. I am sure there was some “science” involved in there somewhere.
https://images.app.goo.gl/zeFv5wGUzvQUh5pb8
images.app.goo.gl/zeFv5wGUzvQUh5pb8
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Antwill
i love a bunch of non-scientists discussing science because they 'read an article' or 'watched a piece'. Its not that your paranoid, its just that everyone is out to get you.
Everybody’s their own expert. It’s the Home Depot mentality. Because a doctor can mud drywall, a drywall contractor knows whether or not vaccines are good for you.
 
i love a bunch of non-scientists discussing science because they 'read an article' or 'watched a piece'. Its not that your paranoid, its just that everyone is out to get you.
That’s fair if someone is just citing or hearing from someone else. There are many within the medical community who don’t agree on treatments and opinions. There is a ton of research that the average can consume that isn’t in line with some medical opinions - doesn’t mean that individual should be discredited because they aren’t an MD.
 
i love a bunch of non-scientists discussing science because they 'read an article' or 'watched a piece'. Its not that your paranoid, its just that everyone is out to get you.
So in your religion are scientists more like priests or angels??
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyLvr
That’s fair if someone is just citing or hearing from someone else. There are many within the medical community who don’t agree on treatments and opinions. There is a ton of research that the average can consume that isn’t in line with some medical opinions - doesn’t mean that individual should be discredited because they aren’t an MD.
He didn't understand any of that.
 
So in your religion are scientists more like priests or angels??
They are flawed people looking for the truth. If their experiments and observations are reproduced they become trusted, get more funding and become well known. If they’re like (ex) Dr. Wakefield, then they disappear into the trash bin of history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stlhuskers
I guess you’re just going to ignore all the progress medicine made in the last hundred years treating pneumonia, cancer, childbirth complications, heart disease, heck even appendicitis-all based on science.
It’s all one big conspiracy designed just to screw you.
Cancer?? HAH! Tell that to Greg Sharpe’s family. Heart disease?? The #1 killer of humans?? 100 years from now we will look back on chemo-therapy the same way we look back now on Doctors when they told people to bathe in sheep’s blood.

Easy to claim “progress” in cherry picked numbers when people are sicker than ever. That’s funny that you think they actually want to cure cancer LOL. I can expect you first in line for the new cancer vaccine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baseball31ne
Cancer?? HAH! Tell that to Greg Sharpe’s family. Heart disease?? The #1 killer of humans?? 100 years from now we will look back on chemo-therapy the same way we look back now on Doctors when they told people to bathe in sheep’s blood.

Easy to claim “progress” in cherry picked numbers when people are sicker than ever. That’s funny that you think they actually want to cure cancer LOL. I can expect you first in line for the new cancer vaccine.
My god...how many people say things like "Yeah, I will be right back" and then walk away and never actually come back to you when you are at a social gathering?
 
Lol what’s your deal? Another gal hit and quit you?
I guess he doesn’t understand why you have ignored all the progress made against cancers like melanoma, ALL, CML, Hodgkins, B cell lymphomas. Screening for colon cancer. Instead, you choose to focus on pancreatic cancer, which was an awful disease when it was first described and is an awful disease now. But it’s conceivable, if we continue to support research like we have that they will find a treatment/treatments that cures pancreatic cancer also.
And there is your whole rant about heart disease. 35 years ago all we could do was give oxygen, control blood pressure and wait and see how much Heart died. Now if you present early enough, they take you down to the Cath Lab open up your infarct related artery, put in a stent and it’s like you never had anything happen at all.
 
I guess he doesn’t understand why you have ignored all the progress made against cancers like melanoma, ALL, CML, Hodgkins, B cell lymphomas. Screening for colon cancer. Instead, you choose to focus on pancreatic cancer, which was an awful disease when it was first described and is an awful disease now. But it’s conceivable, if we continue to support research like we have that they will find a treatment/treatments that cures pancreatic cancer also.
And there is your whole rant about heart disease. 35 years ago all we could do was give oxygen, control blood pressure and wait and see how much Heart died. Now if you present early enough, they take you down to the Cath Lab open up your infarct related artery, put in a stent and it’s like you never had anything happen at all.
None of this is a relevant response to my first post.
 
None of this is a relevant response to my first post.
Well, I wasn’t going to comment directly on your statement that as a contractor in doctor’s offices you feel qualified to judge the entire field of medicine.

Primarily because I didn’t want to make you look bad. Because drawing any attention to it at all, would have that inevitable result.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SomedayHusker
Here’s proof that Covid was all propaganda and we citizens got to pay for it all —

The funny thing about the truth is it stands on its own merit. It doesn’t need government funded propaganda. It amazes me that people believe the mass hysteria and it saddens me that it evoked enough fear to take an experimental shot that at best did nothing ..


On Thursday, America First Legal (AFL) released explosive new documents obtained through ongoing litigation against the U.S. Department of State’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), exposing a vast, government-backed censorship operation to silence Americans under the guise of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “malinformation.” The documents reveal a disturbing alliance between the GEC, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the British Foreign, Commonwealth, Development Office (FCDO), and media censorship organizations, all working in lock-step to manipulate public discourse, control media narratives, and suppress free speech.

The GEC, which was forced to shut down in December 2024, was designed to “combat foreign disinformation abroad.” However, through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, AFL uncovered that the GEC engaged in state-sponsored propaganda, repeatedly using willing participants from private media organizations. Further, AFL’s lawsuit against the GEC revealed that USAID had created an internal “Disinformation Primer” that explicitly praised private sector censorship strategies and recommended further censorship tactics.


The new documents released by AFL show:

The GEC and USAID coordinated efforts to censor “COVID-19 misinformation” and counter “COVID-19 propaganda.”

The GEC collaborated with officials in the British Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office on disinformation efforts.

The GEC coordinated with private media censorship firms, including Poynter and NewsGuard, which provided samples of its Misinformation Fingerprints artificial intelligence (AI) tool, designed to identify and rate websites based on their perceived “misinformation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SomedayHusker
If it was all B
Here’s proof that Covid was all propaganda and we citizens got to pay for it all —

The funny thing about the truth is it stands on its own merit. It doesn’t need government funded propaganda. It amazes me that people believe the mass hysteria and it saddens me that it evoked enough fear to take an experimental shot that at best did nothing ..


On Thursday, America First Legal (AFL) released explosive new documents obtained through ongoing litigation against the U.S. Department of State’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), exposing a vast, government-backed censorship operation to silence Americans under the guise of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “malinformation.” The documents reveal a disturbing alliance between the GEC, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the British Foreign, Commonwealth, Development Office (FCDO), and media censorship organizations, all working in lock-step to manipulate public discourse, control media narratives, and suppress free speech.

The GEC, which was forced to shut down in December 2024, was designed to “combat foreign disinformation abroad.” However, through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, AFL uncovered that the GEC engaged in state-sponsored propaganda, repeatedly using willing participants from private media organizations. Further, AFL’s lawsuit against the GEC revealed that USAID had created an internal “Disinformation Primer” that explicitly praised private sector censorship strategies and recommended further censorship tactics.


The new documents released by AFL show:

The GEC and USAID coordinated efforts to censor “COVID-19 misinformation” and counter “COVID-19 propaganda.”

The GEC collaborated with officials in the British Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office on disinformation efforts.

The GEC coordinated with private media censorship firms, including Poynter and NewsGuard, which provided samples of its Misinformation Fingerprints artificial intelligence (AI) tool, designed to identify and rate websites based on their perceived “misinformation.
If it was all BS, why did Trump pay for operation warp speed?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT