Isn't the mantra "just open the checkbook"?
The problem is that it never seems to end and you have to find a way to keep up and the have nots won't be able to do it. Despite the fact that everyone thinks there is an endless bucket of TV money, sooner or later there will be choices to be made between salaries, facilities and for more than just one sport.
The problem is that really not that many schools can pay that kind of money and there is no guarantee that approach is going to pay off. IF we lose a coordinator for money reasons I have confidence that Frost will be able to replace him with somebody equally as qualified. He put together a heckuva staff at UCF because guys want to work for him. We'll have an advantage from that standpoint. I don't see how the NCAA can legally do anything about it.I can't see the NCAA letting this keep going. They seem to want parity in every other way.
College football is a bubble waiting to burst.
I disagree. It's because of the massive amounts of money in the CF market that makes the coaching salaries and facilities race possible. Programs that pay high salaries all still make money. They can't pay the players directly, so they "pay" them in perks. Some coaches are beneficiaries also.Yep, agree with that. It's like a giant arms race that drains resources.
Our state DOE (not Nebraska) reported a few months ago that roughly half of the bachelors degree recipients went to work at jobs in our state that didn't require a college degree. There are WAY too many liberal arts graduates for the number of liberal arts degree requiring jobs out there. Might be time for some kids to decide on a technical or trade type school.I disagree. It's because of the massive amounts of money in the CF market that makes the coaching salaries and facilities race possible. Programs that pay high salaries all still make money. They can't pay the players directly, so they "pay" them in perks. Some coaches are beneficiaries also.
A parallel issue would be the rise college costs/tuition. Most (even government) economists believe that college costs rose at such a steep level over the years due to the flood of cheap/free money from the federal loan program. To put it simply, college costs (coaches salaries, player facilities) rose so fast and far because they could...the money was there. Economics 101.
Our state DOE (not Nebraska) reported a few months ago that roughly half of the bachelors degree recipients went to work at jobs in our state that didn't require a college degree. There are WAY too many liberal arts graduates for the number of liberal arts degree requiring jobs out there. Might be time for some kids to decide on a technical or trade type school.
Correct
However getting a 4 year degree in a major you most likely will never use has become an "entitlement" to many in todays generation. They view a 4 year degree in liberal arts as an extended vacation away from the real world to find something to do that isnt very hard- and then whine when they arent making as much money as their friends who went into computer science, engineering, business, construction etc But many of them are very hopeful the government will equal it all out for them via redistribution. Zero knowledge of supply and demand.
I disagree. It's because of the massive amounts of money in the CF market that makes the coaching salaries and facilities race possible. Programs that pay high salaries all still make money. They can't pay the players directly, so they "pay" them in perks. Some coaches are beneficiaries also.
A parallel issue would be the rise college costs/tuition. Most (even government) economists believe that college costs rose at such a steep level over the years due to the flood of cheap/free money from the federal loan program. To put it simply, college costs (coaches salaries, player facilities) rose so fast and far because they could...the money was there. Economics 101.