You are correct about government overreach. Conservatives and Libertarians should be shouting it down (as opposed to setting buildings on fire). However, the way you framed your post speaks volumes. You state "killing a man in police custody . . ." A man died while in police custody, there is no proof that he was killed (not yet). So, are we to assume that he was killed because of the color of the skin of the people involved? Some on here would suggest we do that, but doing so is, wait for it, prejudiced and racist.
I think I can take my answer from between the lines.
The choice is not between "everything is about race" and "nothing is about race." What I'm saying is sometimes it's about race. And it's next to impossible for us as white guys to know what that's like because we don't get discriminated against. Once in a while somebody will call us "cracker" or "white boy" or whatever but we don't really care because we have that status as the dominant culture. It's like how you wouldn't get mad if somebody called you out for being good in bed. You're like, "Yep, that is accurate. I do not take offense."
So it's a lot of work for us to imagine what it's like to be in a position where people DO use your race against you in ways that really, actually make your life worse.
No, there hasn't been a ruling. There has been a formal proceeding brought against them alleging that it was a homicide.I said it that way because it was ruled a homicide earlier today, aka "the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another"
Unlawful arrest, killing a man in police custody, out of control government agency with a super powerful union putting up barriers to protect themselves from prosecution, this is the type of government overreach that should be shouted down by conservatives and personal rights advocates everywhere.
No, there hasn't been a ruling. There has been a formal proceeding brought against them alleging that it was a homicide.
Second degree murder 'depraved heart' charged against the driver of the van? How they hell are they gonna prove that one? Did the driver take the van down a slalom course and repeatedly slam on the breaks?
While people are celebrating, they're gonna get a rude awakening when in six months, most of these charges are gonna get thrown out or, severely knocked-down.
More blacks are killed by other blacks. But somehow, that never seems to make news or a big deal to the black community. Go figure.Sure glad there isn't looting and burning of businesses every time a black person kills another black person or we wouldn't have a building standing.
People aren't protesting and rioting because a white person killed a black person. They're protesting and rioting because those black people are killed and the killers seem to be completely immune from prosecution.
It surprises me that the good cops won't throw these guys out. They desperately need a good relationship with the community to be more effective at their job, and covering up for dudes who are just out looking to bash some skulls undermines the efforts of all the cops out there doing it right.
Second degree murder 'depraved heart' charged against the driver of the van? How they hell are they gonna prove that one? Did the driver take the van down a slalom course and repeatedly slam on the breaks?
While people are celebrating, they're gonna get a rude awakening when in six months, most of these charges are gonna get thrown out or, severely knocked-down.
I may be naive about this but I honestly think they are protesting and rioting against an institution that seemingly can do what they want to whom they want without repercussions and the only color that matters is the uniform the officers are wearingThere is no way you actually believe the above. Prior to the Gray homicide, Baltimore has lost around 40 or so black people to homicide in four months of 2015. Click here if you don't believe me.
To say the protestors aren't doing it based on race is absolutely crazy.
I may be naive about this but I honestly think they are protesting and rioting against an institution that seemingly can do what they want to whom they want without repercussions and the only color that matters is the uniform the officers are wearing
Its population is 63% African American. Its mayor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, is a black Democrat who won 87% of the vote in 2011. Her police commissioner, Anthony Batts, is black, too, as are most of the city’s police. Baltimore, like Washington DC, Philadelphia and Detroit—and completely unlike suburbs such as Ferguson, Missouri—is a centre of black political control.
So it was the prosecutor that prevented a conviction, not the facts. Better let the DOJ know about that. DOJ stands for department of justice. You have a small brain.Yo I'm pretty sure that if I got into a car at Point A with another person, and by the time we arrived at Point B they were dead and had a crushed throat/spine, I would be charged with murder pretty damn fast.
It's also extremely funny to me that all of the sudden the Prosecutor having loose ties to someone involved in the case is a Major Breach of Interest and should be recused, simply because she isn't just acting as the police force's second defense attorney (cough Ferguson).
So it was the prosecutor that prevented a conviction, not the facts. Better let the DOJ know about that. DOJ stands for department of justice. You have a small brain.
You could have just typed "you're right" and saved yourself about 15 minutes.If you read the grand jury documents in the Ferguson matter, the ADA presenting the case most certainly acted as defense counsel, starting with giving the grand jurors as the potential charging law the wrong standard under which police officers can use deadly force. She gave them the standard that existed before the Supreme Court case of Tennessee v Garner, a standard that basically said police can shoot whenever they want. Garner narrowed that standard significantly. Every competent ADA knows Garner like the back of their hand. The fact that she apparently somehow forgot about Garner and instructed the grand jurors on a law declared unconstitutional is a basis to can her for incompetency right there. Then she never cross-examined police officers about serious discrepancies between their reports written the day of the shooting and their grand jury testimony. As just one example of literally dozens, the written reports of the investigating officers all said that there was glass outside Officer Wilson's car from the closed passenger side window that Wilson apparently fired through. In the grand jury hearing every investigating officer testified that their was no glass and the intact window was down. "Strangely" enough, the car was available to be looked at by the grand jurors, but that critical passenger side door had somehow disappeared. But despite that, the ADA did not confront the investigating officers about the gross discrepancy between their written reports and photos showing what appeared to be glass glittering on the pavement beneath the passenger side door, and their grand jury testimony. I have no idea whether Wilson should be charged. The fact that the DOJ found no basis to do so is telling, IMHO. But the grand jury was a whitewash, pure and simple. To argue otherwise is simply wrong.
You could have just typed "you're right" and saved yourself about 15 minutes.
If you read the grand jury documents in the Ferguson matter, the ADA presenting the case most certainly acted as defense counsel, starting with giving the grand jurors as the potential charging law the wrong standard under which police officers can use deadly force. She gave them the standard that existed before the Supreme Court case of Tennessee v Garner, a standard that basically said police can shoot whenever they want. Garner narrowed that standard significantly. Every competent ADA knows Garner like the back of their hand. The fact that she apparently somehow forgot about Garner and instructed the grand jurors on a law declared unconstitutional is a basis to can her for incompetency right there. Then she never cross-examined police officers about serious discrepancies between their reports written the day of the shooting and their grand jury testimony. As just one example of literally dozens, the written reports of the investigating officers all said that there was glass outside Officer Wilson's car from the closed passenger side window that Wilson apparently fired through. In the grand jury hearing every investigating officer testified that their was no glass and the intact window was down. "Strangely" enough, the car was available to be looked at by the grand jurors, but that critical passenger side door had somehow disappeared. But despite that, the ADA did not confront the investigating officers about the gross discrepancy between their written reports and photos showing what appeared to be glass glittering on the pavement beneath the passenger side door, and their grand jury testimony. I have no idea whether Wilson should be charged. The fact that the DOJ found no basis to do so is telling, IMHO. But the grand jury was a whitewash, pure and simple. To argue otherwise is simply wrong.
No, just trying to help you out. By the way, wasn't the DA a he, and not a she?I'm not sure how fast you type, but I doubt if that took me 4 minutes. But I appreciate your concern for my time expenditure. You want me to clear my next post with you?
No, just trying to help you out. By the way, wasn't the DA a he, and not a she?
Maybe they should spend more time getting an education and a job to while away all their free time and quit living off my tax dollars.How about "Bad Guy" or "Naughty Person"?
The more I think about it, though, we don't really know if garden variety rioters are either bad or naughty deep down.
Maybe they're great people that like to burn things and loot.
Translation; I think, based on everything we can theorize and not prove, Wilson is the benefit of a bunch of professionals who work in different departments and rarely ever interact, collaborating to cover up an obvious crime because professionals who have great jobs do that all the time so they can be put in the position of losing them. Gotcha.
Maybe they should spend more time getting an education and a job to while away all their free time and quit living off my tax dollars.