Apparently Riley is "very concerned" about the OL.
Maybe, just maybe, Riley was using his comments as a way to exert some motivation and sense of urgency to the team. I'm not saying we'll roll out All-Americans on the line, but I also don't think these guys are going to be crap. We might see once they get used to a QB who gets rid of the ball quickly that they get comfortable with the new system and also opens up run lanes.OL will suck again.
It doesn't add up. If you look at who those kids were recruited by (and in general, 'stars'), this should be (at a minimum) an average to above average OL. Something is wrong.........He should be.
It doesn't add up. If you look at who those kids were recruited by (and in general, 'stars'), this should be (at a minimum) an average to above average OL. Something is wrong.........
Well, that simply covers all bases and would be the most important fact to really understand. When you've had an average offensive line, it is either the talent or the coaching or some combination of both.Just my 2 cents but Cav has not delivered as advertised. If the kids have all this talent and we are an average OL then it has to be coaching. Either that or the OL isn't as talented as many say.
This team did have some decent success in the first 2/3 of the season then whether it was injury or something else, it did appear to be a different line down the stretch.
Injuries and starting multiple walkons had a bunch to do with that. Gates playing hurt was an obvious weak spot. Our center play was horrible last year (again) as it has been for multiple years. It all starts on the O line with your center and we have to be better there. We pulled up a sophomore walkon Conrad to play tackle last year when he wasn't even on the radar because the only option other than a true freshman. Pelini's staff failed miserably for a couple of years on their offensive line recruiting and it bit us in the butt last year. IMO we'll be better this year barring multiple injuries again.We were very average and played a bunch of crappy teams early and then went 1-4 down the stretch against any team with an actual pulse. The offensive line was average to poor all year.
We had next to no depth and I have a gut feeling that if Riley and Langs could have started Raridon and even Farniok and Michael Decker, they would have but couldn't burn their redshirts because they just needed that developmental year. I would also second the notion of saying we had a poor center in Utter.
If that were the case wouldn't Raridon, Farniok and Decker be clearly 1st string this spring?
If I were to criticize Cav for anything it would be that he seems to value playing experience too much. You won't convince me that Decker couldn't have done what Utter did last year, but Decker lacked experience so Utter gotbthe nod.
It seems like all coaches on deck to help with the o-line this year. I caught heat for defending Cav at one point, then heat for questioning some specific things I and others were seeing on the field. Cav seems to be pretty involved on several levels with the players and recruits; maybe he was falling prey to his own " hardening of the attitudes " on how to do things. Its amazing how many categories we have been ranked in the 100's as far as relative success ( and some coaches are gone ). HCMR is obviously on this issue, so it may work out with the group we have - if we aren't getting to the level of top 20 success in an area, imo they make changes now; we are results driven ( you know, like real jobs ). GBRNo more excuses for Cav please. His entire career @ NU has been an excuse of why he hasn't had a good unit yet. No mas. The guy is on the hot seat.
But In my mind, he has a clean slate for this year. I'm going into the year hoping he turns it around. But if he doesn't prove himself this year, he never will and then time to say bye bye.
No more excuses of needing to play walk-ons. If a walk-on beats out a scholarship players it's either a) the walk-on is very good & was over looked in HS or b) scholarship players haven't been developed & thats coaching as fault. You don't get a ton of time with kids in college to develope them. 5 years. Cavs in year 3. Can't wait until a kids a RS Senior until he develops. But again, let's hope it turns around this seasonx
Think you have it with the Verbal. And it gives some comfort to ( internet hacks ) me GbrYou can read his comments as the "sky is falling", or "you guys have the talent and experience to play better, here's a verbal kick in the ass."
Seems odd that with all the talent coming to the Spring Game, not one of them is a running back as far as I know.If you ask me, I'm just as concerned about Reggie Davis as Coach Cav.
We were very average and played a bunch of crappy teams early and then went 1-4 down the stretch against any team with an actual pulse. The offensive line was average to poor all year.
Seems odd that with all the talent coming to the Spring Game, not one of them is a running back as far as I know.
Yes-people often try to read the most negative thing in short comments that don't really describe what they mean. Why it seems like people go out of their way to find stuff to be concerned about I will never understand.You can read his comments as the "sky is falling", or "you guys have the talent and experience to play better, here's a verbal kick in the ass."
Could very well not as talented as we think. Really need an above average left tackle with the type of offense Riley plans to run. Does not appear we have oneJust my 2 cents but Cav has not delivered as advertised. If the kids have all this talent and we are an average OL then it has to be coaching. Either that or the OL isn't as talented as many say.
It's been a while since we had a center with the "measurable" - 6'/4" 'ish and 300. Who was playing the position prior to Utter & Pelini? Can't remember for the life of me.....
Reeves
I'd say since Garrison in 2002-2003... and he was only slightly above averageWe haven't had an above-average center for over a decade. Maybe well over a decade.
Maybe, just maybe, Riley was using his comments as a way to exert some motivation and sense of urgency to the team. I'm not saying we'll roll out All-Americans on the line, but I also don't think these guys are going to be crap. We might see once they get used to a QB who gets rid of the ball quickly that they get comfortable with the new system and also opens up run lanes.
"OL will suck again" has been the rally cry of Nebraska fans ever since the championship run died.
Maybe, just maybe, Riley was using his comments as a way to exert some motivation and sense of urgency to the team. I'm not saying we'll roll out All-Americans on the line, but I also don't think these guys are going to be crap. We might see once they get used to a QB who gets rid of the ball quickly that they get comfortable with the new system and also opens up run lanes.
"OL will suck again" has been the rally cry of Nebraska fans ever since the championship run died.
What about Jacob Hickman?I'd say since Garrison in 2002-2003... and he was only slightly above average
Maybe Sewell he was drafted atleast
Could very well not as talented as we think. Really need an above average left tackle with the type of offense Riley plans to run. Does not appear we have one
Yes, the offensive line is a huge concern. In the bowl game our line was relatively healthy. Yet we could not run at all against what was a historically awful Tennessee rush defense. I can excuse Gates not playing well against a great, great DE. But our inability to run the ball was a huge red flag. I had hoped that getting rid of Utter and the infusion of good young talent would improve things. But apparently it hasn't.
If I was coach Cav I would freshen up that resume and get it ready.