Seems like the difference between playing FOR Sims and playing FOR HH is like in baseball.I think there is a lot to weigh, but some of this is hard because it has been only 3 games, but Sims has continued to just be the guy he has always been.
HH - Seems to make the better reads when running the read option. There has been a number of times where Sims should have pitched the ball or should have run it, but has made the wrong read. HH seems to be making the correct read most of the time. He also doesn't turn it over and that is the major key. His downfalls as he doesn't seem to be quite the homerun threat Sims is in the running game and also seems to run very early instead of waiting to find a receiver. Both Sims and HH stare down receivers.
Sims - Threw some decent passes that were just flat out dropped by Fidone and some of our WR's that killed drives where we were moving. Turnover machine that just seems to lack confidence.
I know the coaches see way more than we do, but I think you just have to ride HH until he makes mistakes at the same clip as Sims. I would like to see Sims against weaker competition to just get a little bit of a base, but man he really squandered some stuff against a really bad CU D. That game still pisses me off because CU's D line is not better than NIU
Sims is the guy on the mound who constantly walks hitters. As a result the infielders are lacking in their pre-steps, not 100% ready to make a play, and when it gets hit to them, they can get caught on their heels.
With HH, he seems like the guy on the mound who is going to serve up strikes, as a result the ball is going to be constantly in play, so the players are on their toes and ready to make a play.
Just an analogy that seems to fit.