Free Access

[huskerfan66]

Right, because it is very clearly explained at the top of this board that politics are not up for discussion here. This is a Nebraska sports board. If you guys want to get political there are plenty of other venues for that. Crying about free speech is laughable. It's a bad look.

True. But many on here like yourself have been on here for YEARS. Formed a brotherhood. I know we don't all agree, not even on husker football but we exchange our views.

The open board was a good thing. If we can only talk sports then maybe they should ban anything OT.

This board didn't always have the header sticky note on it.

 

[Suhrreal]

True. But many on here like yourself have been on here for YEARS. Formed a brotherhood. I know we don't all agree, not even on husker football but we exchange our views.

The open board was a good thing. If we can only talk sports then maybe they should ban anything OT.

This board didn't always have the header sticky note on it.

The problem is politics brings out a new level of divisiveness and nastiness in many people on both sides. It just leads to threads full of people calling each other names with no substance. When stuff like that happens those threads end up at the top of the forum and people have to put up with seeing the JaemeGONEs of the board clogging up valuable real estate.

 

[mwulf]

There were some pretty vile posts and comments on that board and the fact they were in something related to Huskers or the University was embarrassing. It was a bad look and reflected poorly on our fanbase. There are plenty of threads on Reddit if people want to spout off about the topics of the day

 

[huskerfan66]

The problem is politics brings out a new level of divisiveness and nastiness in many people on both sides. It just leads to threads full of people calling each other names with no substance. When stuff like that happens those threads end up at the top of the forum and people have to put up with seeing the JaemeGONEs of the board clogging up valuable real estate.

True. Some can handle booze and others can't too

 

[Meanfarmer3160]

I agree with you about private business, they get to decide how things work for their business. But it chaps my ass when people use the private business argument when it suits them and then when they disagree with a cake maker in Colorado they say, “he won’t make cakes for LGBTQ+, fúck that guy he should have to close his doors forever”. That’s bullshit, he’s a private business owner and the government should stay out of his business.

Communist Cackling lefrist loons..and knucklheads.

 

[Tetonia]

Bro, where have you been? This has been going on for almost two decades now. It started around 2007 -- where have you been since then?

Please do not bring up Elon Musk and pretend like he is a champion for free speech lol.

Mods it's time to JaemeGONE some more people.

Whatever dude. Twitter was full-on censorship prior to Elon, and was having a MASSIVE influence on public indoctrination, straight from the Oligarchy, and no longer is. It’s UNDOUBTEDLY made a huge and obvious impact since then, and the Oligarchy is losing their shit over it, visibly. ‘Disinformation’ is just the new catchphrase for whoever dares to speak out against them. There were still sane people in the federal govt in 2007. They’re all gone or dead now.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Nonsense. This is a private business. If the website closes down was your "free speech" also infringed on? So called conservative people telling businesses how they have to be run. Now I've seen it all.

That's an extremely low IQ false equivalency comparison.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Uh ohh @sklarbodds you gonna ban him? You ban other people for less.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Bro, where have you been? This has been going on for almost two decades now. It started around 2007 -- where have you been since then?

Please do not bring up Elon Musk and pretend like he is a champion for free speech lol.

Mods it's time to JaemeGONE some more people.

The hallmark of frauds who can't defend their ideas is to cry for the mods to ban people for challenging them. When did you turn into such a pussy?

 

[Huskers123456]

That's an extremely low IQ false equivalency comparison.

Mark you down for more business regulation. Got it.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Mark you down for more business regulation. Got it.

Grasping for straws.

 

[Huskers123456]

Grasping for straws.

How so?

 

[GBRforLife1]

How so?

I never advocated for the govt to regulate a private business for one...

 

[RedTheGreat]

Skylar responded in this thread but deleted the response. Skylar just to clear things up can you or have you banned people based on DMs?

Regardless of what I think of the thread in question a response on the record makes sense.

 

[GBRforLife1]

Skylar responded in this thread but deleted the response. Skylar just to clear things up can you or have you banned people based on DMs?

Regardless of what I think of the thread in question a response on the record makes sense.

On brand.

 

[RedTheGreat]

On brand.

Don't lose your joy.