Agree mostly... Where this hire could really shine is if JP proves hat he can recruit as well.I think some people are taking this way too seriously. We are talking about a position coach here, not even a coordinator. It's not like this was a make or break hire that was going to have a huge impact on the success or lack of success of the team. You don't need to make a "splash" hire for every position coach. That is why I am fine with this hire, despite the fact I am usually not big on legacy hires who don't have much experience. MR says the hire wasn't about Parrella's Husker background, and I believe him. But he said that it was an added bonus, and I agree-it's certainly not a bad thing to have somebody on staff who has played for the program. People who complain about this hire seem to be the perpetually angry and disappointed crowd who can't be happy with anything.
I appreciate Dirk's articles. He was one of the main proponent in looking into our former coach's 7 year overview as well as a driving force to move on from mediocrity. I'm hoping this article brings some good mojo to next season. Why isn't it September 5? UGH! Cannot come soon enough!
Dirk makes some good points but many of the assistants he listed who had experience were either getting booted from their original school or without any great coaching results. Barney, cmon weak at ISU weak always, Cosgrove, Wisc couldn't wait to dump....Elmassian I think always had a great mastermind in Bud Foster..it was Fosters D at VT that PE was helping run...so.. it's not like we were getting really good experienced assistants from other top programs or coaches with proven top results..almost the oppositeA