I'm hoping he just blows it off since it was a sign.According to Twitter, won't be going to Miss State this weekend as planned due to illness. Doesn't mean he won't go a week or two later.
How do you know you will be sick 3 days from now?According to Twitter, won't be going to Miss State this weekend as planned due to illness. Doesn't mean he won't go a week or two later.
neb is on a few recruits with very interesting lack of recruiting activity from rivals given the recruits ranking and ability.I agree that it sounds like a cover for the real story.
neb is on a few recruits with very interesting lack of recruiting activity from rivals given the recruits ranking and ability.
the Cali kids and Fitz ties to neb seem strangely strong for national recruits not in the area
dismuke hasn't taken any official visits and is surrounded by some of the best schools in the country.It's hard for me to agree that ties to Nebraska are strangely strong when we are talking about kids that haven't even given us a verbal commitment.
69 days since our last commitment (non-kicker), 20 days to garner 10+ commitments.
Unless I'm missing something, the Cali kids are all on Keyshawn Johnson's 7 on 7 team, including Marquel Dismuke in this year's class.
As far as Fitzpatrick, I don't know.
It's hard for me to agree that ties to Nebraska are strangely strong when we are talking about kids that haven't even given us a verbal commitment.
69 days since our last commitment (non-kicker), 20 days to garner 10+ commitments.
I understand your frustration and anxiety, but what is the alternative? Many of the players we are in on have indicated when they will announce, and it isn't according to your timeline or mine. We have to wait for them to let the world know.So, being high on someone's board is the same as getting their verbal commitment? Did not know that. Makes you wonder what all the anxiety is about.
So how high on their board do you have to be?
Top 3 or Top 5 is pretty high considering there are 120+ FBS schools. Do they all get to count him as N?
How do you know where you truly stand on someone's board?
If he tweets one thing good about you, is that good enough?
Is a gut feel from a recruiting analyst good enough to count him as N?
As long as somebody can provide an positive interpretation of some teenager's cryptic tweet, can we count him as N?
I can live with not being sure as long as our coaches are pretty sure. The problem is we won't know until February.My only point of contention is that I would not act like Fitz is ours when he hasn't stuck his neck out to verbal.
The anxiety isn't really about how long since last commit. It's about less than three weeks left and we still aren't sure who 40% of our recruits will be.
It's somewhat simple...if a kid verbals then shuts down his recruitment completely...as in doesn't take other coaches' calls, takes zero visits to other schools, tells his HS coach to not even entertain calls (on his behalf) from other schools, etc. then he is pretty committed. On the other hand, if a kid gives a verbal then keeps talking to other coaches, sets up visits to other schools, says things like "at the moment I'm 100% committed but I just want to make sure I made the right choice," etc. then you are just at the top of the kids board.So, being high on someone's board is the same as getting their verbal commitment? Did not know that. Makes you wonder what all the anxiety is about.
So how high on their board do you have to be?
Top 3 or Top 5 is pretty high considering there are 120+ FBS schools. Do they all get to count him as N?
How do you know where you truly stand on someone's board?
If he tweets one thing good about you, is that good enough?
Is a gut feel from a recruiting analyst good enough to count him as N?
As long as somebody can provide an positive interpretation of some teenager's cryptic tweet, can we count him as N?
No worries on my part...I may air my concerns, but you'll notice I am not calling for anyone's job or saying our coaches suck.
It's somewhat simple...if a kid verbals then shuts down his recruitment completely...as in doesn't take other coaches' calls, takes zero visits to other schools, tells his HS coach to not even entertain calls (on his behalf) from other schools, etc. then he is pretty committed. On the other hand, if a kid gives a verbal then keeps talking to other coaches, sets up visits to other schools, says things like "at the moment I'm 100% committed but I just want to make sure I made the right choice," etc. then you are just at the top of the kids board.
A verbal isn't much different than being high on someone's board anymore. And we are just entering the final turn of the race. Still time to close gap and finish on the podium. I really think these kids parents are the ones keeping them from committing and they want to make their commitment a big deal.(their kids who like the attention).
If they don't end up on official visits then they really aren't serious about,those schools and there haven't been visits to major threat schools.I didn't do the quote thing, so it may not have been clear on what I was referring to. I was referring to the bolded part below.
You'll notice that's quite different than what you said.
Well there were a couple of cases where Stoops had kids commit to NU then pull the plug on signing day and sign with OU. That really screwed us over at linebacker in particular. Later I think it was Travis Lewis admitted that it was OU the whole time. Obviously that helped OU immensely in conference play. I think we had Corey McKewon playing where Lewis would have.Yorocco, I see in two threads at least now you are hinting at some monkey business going on... Why don't you stop beating around the bush and just say what you think is going on? Do you think the coaches are buying them off? Boosters? what are you suggesting?
I remember that... But I was more curious about the monkey business yorocco was suggesting we were participating in. What is he suggesting? What have our coaches or our program offered to these players to make them all of a sudden lose interest in other programs? Still waiting for his response.Well there was a couple of cases where Stoops had kids commit to NU then pull the plug on signing day and sign with OU. That really screwed us over at linebacker in particular. Later I think it was Travis Lewis admitted that it was OU the whole time. Obviously that helped OU immensely in conference play. I think we had Corey McKewon playing where Lewis would have.
My point is that some kids will commit then shut down the process. Some will commit and still look. Some will not commit but have no intention of going elsewhere they just like the attention. Or maybe their parents won't let them commit because they are not as sold as the player is. Example: I would say Fitzpatrick is more N than Alexander. Even thought Alexander is committed. We could land both or neither. We are talking about kids. They are unpredictable. Again None of them are N till signing day. So I don't think Fits is N . Even if he commits.I didn't do the quote thing, so it may not have been clear on what I was referring to. I was referring to the bolded part below.
You'll notice that's quite different than what you said.
If they don't end up on official visits then they really aren't serious about,those schools and there haven't been visits to major threat schools.
It's almost like they know,it's neb but just want everyone to think they are still open.
I see no action that says any of,them are looking at other schools.
Just talk.
Really surprised more schools aren't working the 2 Cali kids, and fitz more. Something fishy