I'm a retired gambler, but I still follow very closely.Just wondering if anyone on here is betting on any spreads or games tonight or this weekend? Any spreads stand out? Baseball or football
I'm a retired gambler, but I still follow very closely.
Take those 3 and thank me on Sunday.
I agree with the cubs bet. I think Clemson will cover against BC. They get out to a quick start it could get ugly. What is BYU's record??I'm a retired gambler, but I still follow very closely.
A) If you don't mind laying odds, I'd definitely take Lester and the Cubs.
B) There is something fishy about Boston College only getting 17 points vs. Clemson, considering they lost 49-0 to Virginia Tech. When spreads don't add up, I go opposite from instinct and I'd take BC + 17
C) Take BYU +6 @ Michigan State. Michigan State doesn't have the same D, not a very solid run game and an unspectacular passing game. The loss @ Indiana was less to do with how good Indiana is vs. how pedestrian Michigan State is.
Take those 3 and thank me on Sunday.
Sounds like a safe bet. Don't know much about Wash st though?Don't gamble much but saw somewhere that Stanford is 9-1 ats under Shaw after a loss and only favored by 7.5 over wash st.
I'm a retired gambler, but I still follow very closely.
A) If you don't mind laying odds, I'd definitely take Lester and the Cubs.
B) There is something fishy about Boston College only getting 17 points vs. Clemson, considering they lost 49-0 to Virginia Tech. When spreads don't add up, I go opposite from instinct and I'd take BC + 17
C) Take BYU +6 @ Michigan State. Michigan State doesn't have the same D, not a very solid run game and an unspectacular passing game. The loss @ Indiana was less to do with how good Indiana is vs. how pedestrian Michigan State is.
Take those 3 and thank me on Sunday.
Clemson line is now 18 a bit scary. I agree on New England Brady will want to make a point. However I have not seen much of Maryland at all?Couple of lines that stuck out to me is Maryland as a 2 point road favorite at Penn St. I think Penn St wins that game SU take the points and Penn St.
I also bet the Clemson game
In the NFL, I have the Pats laying 10 1/2 against Cleveland. Brady will throw for 300 and the Pats will win by 3 scores.
Those are my Stone Cold Lead Pipe Locks of the Year...for the week.
Careful taking Stanford....that's a sucker bet imo. Washington exposed stanfords secondary and the last thing you want is a weak secondary going against a mike leach team.
Boy Colorado has been playing really well and with a lot of confidence. USC not so much.I would take USC and give the 5 1/2 points. I was 2-0 last week. Might be on the second page under "betters"
You left out an important detail. Would you have hit the 7 teamer or did the hedge save you?I'll tell you about my one successful gambling story, since I don't gamble very often. A buddy of mine was heavy into it, and I was always more amazed at the recorded messages these phone lines had, I thought to myself, how do they do such a great job of making it sound so good, all this information was a LOCK, and on and on... I always seem to admire someone who can bs that well.
So I told him I'd go ahead and play the 7 team NFL parlay for 20 bucks. It paid something like 700, if you got them all. I went through the list and looked at the line and made a note of every pick that made sense. I then proceeded to bet on the Exact Opposite of what I thought logically made sense, as it often seemed to me that the results wound up that way.
As it turned out, I starting hitting game after game, and there I was, a half an hour before the 7th game started, I had 6 in the bag. I did the math, and bet half of the 700 against myself on the last game to guarantee a $340 or something payday.
I haven't gambled since... but the opposite theory thing, I use often to this day.
Ahh, sorry about that.. yep the hedge is what saved me.. that seventh game went the other way.You left out an important detail. Would you have hit the 7 teamer or did the hedge save you?
So I'm 1-1 after points A and B. Props to the folks who saw BC for what they were. Now I'm down to stinky BYU to come out ahead for the weekend.I'm a retired gambler, but I still follow very closely.
A) If you don't mind laying odds, I'd definitely take Lester and the Cubs.
B) There is something fishy about Boston College only getting 17 points vs. Clemson, considering they lost 49-0 to Virginia Tech. When spreads don't add up, I go opposite from instinct and I'd take BC + 17
C) Take BYU +6 @ Michigan State. Michigan State doesn't have the same D, not a very solid run game and an unspectacular passing game. The loss @ Indiana was less to do with how good Indiana is vs. how pedestrian Michigan State is.
Take those 3 and thank me on Sunday.
In college we got what we thought would be the most successful; perceptive group of bettors together to dominate through a weekend on 100% agreed bets and mainly parlays. WE missed on 26 of 27 ( lol, weI'll tell you about my one successful gambling story, since I don't gamble very often. A buddy of mine was heavy into it, and I was always more amazed at the recorded messages these phone lines had, I thought to myself, how do they do such a great job of making it sound so good, all this information was a LOCK, and on and on... I always seem to admire someone who can bs that well.
So I told him I'd go ahead and play the 7 team NFL parlay for 20 bucks. It paid something like 700, if you got them all. I went through the list and looked at the line and made a note of every pick that made sense. I then proceeded to bet on the Exact Opposite of what I thought logically made sense, as it often seemed to me that the results wound up that way.
As it turned out, I starting hitting game after game, and there I was, a half an hour before the 7th game started, I had 6 in the bag. I did the math, and bet half of the 700 against myself on the last game to guarantee a $340 or something payday.
I haven't gambled since... but the opposite theory thing, I use often to this day.
In college we got what we thought would be the most successful; perceptive group of bettors together to dominate through a weekend on 100% agreed bets and mainly parlays. WE missed on 26 of 27 ( lol, we
really tried ); there were upsets, but you would have been rich doing your opposite theory. I tried to point that out; but that was the end of the group thing, no one was willing to spend more time after that 1-26 result. GBR