BummerHe's not here and I believe second session has begun ((Watts neither).
Change the thread title to calm the masses.
2017 recruiting class really went to crap early. I guess all 3 could still end up at Nebraska, but I know I was hard on Bo for his recruiting classes not sticking past their sophomore years.
I'm not gonna hammer on Riley yet but I hope we start getting this figured out.
Nebraska has always lived on the edge with quality athletes that have had acedemics issues. Sometimes things turn out well. Sometimes you don't. Always suspicious of late flips coming Huskers way that have seemed destined for other programs. Can't remember having two in the same year that were this highly regarded.Coaches need to know where kids are atacademically. If these 3 don't make it, this is on the coach's shoulders. This is the same bullshit that we chewed Bo out for.
Nebraska has always lived on the edge with quality athletes that have had acedemics issues. Sometimes things turn out well. Sometimes you don't. Always suspicious of late flips coming Huskers way that have seemed destined for other programs. Can't remember having two in the same year that were this highly regarded.
Maybe not so much on the DB as we seem to be stirring a lot of interest with quality individuals this recruiting cycles. This might cause us to jump back in on some defensive line recruits. Hope we can make up for lost ground.They were already undersigning in that class, so they were playing with fire by not going after sure qualifiers. This is really going to hurt.
What's to spin? Either he makes it here or he doesn't. I don't know how spin might be applied here...Great. I wonder how this will be spun.
Coach's job is to get players to say yes, he has no control of kids getting the necessary grades or test scores.
Keyshawn, you could put on Riley. Not Blades or Watts.
Could go either way with that. Coach 100% has the ability to know how a kid is doing in class. If it were 6 or 7 guys instead of 1 or 2 we'd be singing a different tune.Coach's job is to get players to say yes, he has no control of kids getting the necessary grades or test scores.
Keyshawn, you could put on Riley. Not Blades or Watts.
Coach's job is to get players to say yes, he has no control of kids getting the necessary grades or test scores.
Keyshawn, you could put on Riley. Not Blades or Watts.
Exactly. These coaches had to know that he was an academic risk. But they probably thought he was worth the risk.Coach's job is to recruit players who can qualify.
Exactly. These coaches had to know that he was an academic risk. But they probably thought he was worth the risk.
Disagree 100%. Getting kids who you know are actually going to make it to campus to say yes is the coach's job. I hope nobody is giving Bo credit for signing Bubba Starling and Monte Harrison.
They were already undersigning in that class, so they were playing with fire by not going after sure qualifiers. This is really going to hurt.
Evidently, he's only worth the risk if he makes it. Haven't you been paying attention in this thread?Blades was/is the worth the risk. Hopefully he can contribute down the road.
Would be true if Florida had backed off.
I agree 100% and there is a difference between players transferring early or getting kicked off the team vs recruits not making it on campus.Coach's job is to get players to say yes, he has no control of kids getting the necessary grades or test scores.
Keyshawn, you could put on Riley. Not Blades or Watts.
Coach's job is to get players to say yes, he has no control of kids getting the necessary grades or test scores.
Keyshawn, you could put on Riley. Not Blades or Watts.
When it comes to attitude I have to put that on the kid.
I'm am 100% into self accountability. So I personally don't put KJJ on Riley.
I can however see how someone could say that Riley could have been more proactive in ensuring he was doing what he needed to do before it got to him leaving.
Evidently, he's only worth the risk if he makes it. Haven't you been paying attention in this thread?
I don't disagree that if we lose Blades and Watts this class looks totally different. I do think it is telling that other big name programs continued to pursue these talents to the very end as well, so in our coaches' eyes, it was worth the risk.If he can indeed enroll and take a redshirt academic year, then yes, he was worth the risk. Is that the case for sure? If so, then I stand corrected. But taking kids that are academic risks in an already small class is really setting yourself up for depth issues. This definitely takes the luster off of this class if Blades and Watts don't make it in as academic redshirts.
I don't disagree that if we lose Blades and Watts this class looks totally different. I do think it is telling that other big name programs continued to pursue these talents to the very end as well, so in our coaches' eyes, it was worth the risk.
Blades was also salve for the wounds left by Jamire Calvin... we were burned there as well.
It begs the question, should we have not gone after these guys and gone a safer route? Maybe, but sometimes the potential reward outweighs the risk. If you've got a top 5 DB ready to sign, you take it. I can't see other top schools in need of DBs saying no if they were in a similar situation...
Definitely a slippery slope. You can't formulate a class this way. You take a chance on a few at most... it seems to me that we have said no to more than one high profile recruit already due to grades... the coaches must have felt the risk was worth it with Blades and Watts...It's a slippery slope though, and it would appear to have impacted our depth under BP.
Any news on him still qualifying for an academic redshirt?
I'm am 100% into self accountability. So I personally don't put KJJ on Riley.
I can however see how someone could say that Riley could have been more proactive in ensuring he was doing what he needed to do before it got to him leaving.
I don't disagree that if we lose Blades and Watts this class looks totally different. I do think it is telling that other big name programs continued to pursue these talents to the very end as well, so in our coaches' eyes, it was worth the risk.
Blades was also salve for the wounds left by Jamire Calvin... we were burned there as well.
It begs the question, should we have not gone after these guys and gone a safer route? Maybe, but sometimes the potential reward outweighs the risk. If you've got a top 5 DB ready to sign, you take it. I can't see other top schools in need of DBs saying no if they were in a similar situation...
You may be right, I'm not connected to be able to say.I disagree that these guys were being pursued aggressively to the end. Just because the schollie offer wasn't officially pulled doesn't mean that programs didn't back way off in favor of less risky prospects