Noticed Cuse played at Wisconsin recently and lost by 17. He was leading scorer for Cuse at 14 in 38 minutes. Would think he'd put up similar if at NU. Curious if he thinks this is playing out better for him. May be too early yet.
Noticed Cuse played at Wisconsin recently and lost by 17. He was leading scorer for Cuse at 14 in 38 minutes. Would think he'd put up similar if at NU. Curious if he thinks this is playing out better for him. May be too early yet.
I think he wanted out and came up with an excuse.
I think he wanted out and came up with an excuse.
if that were true he'd still be here. Cuse isn't making the tournament this year.
He and his dad didn't want him to have to defend and dribble/drive like Miles wanted him to do more of to expand his game. They think he has a better shot at the pros if they hide his flaws rather than expose them and inprove on them.
This year, with our lack of shooting and Webster drives to the bucket, I think that he would have had a great chance with him at NU.Cuse has a much better chance of making the dance than NU...don't you think?
You think people will "crow" if we win a NCAA tournament game within the next two years? Lol! Let's worry about getting over .500 first and maybe the NIT. Baby steps.I also think Nebraska's youth probably develops more this year without him here and that will pay dividends in the next year or two. When Watson and Morrow are seniors, Jordy is a junior, Roby is a junior, and this team had experience that they've gained over the last couple of weeks with games against UCLA, Creighton and Kansas, and the upcoming Big Ten schedule, this team is going to learn and grow more by being thrown into it vs. having a guy chuck up 20 shots and getting hot every now and again.
I am predicting not only an NCAA tournament appearance, but a win in two years. They may even make the dance next season.
But the typical "three-man-weave" "Miles is in over his head" crowd will certainly crow about that.
I really doubt Miles makes it two more if he continues down the current path. Next year is very likely sink or swim.I stand by my statement. Give this team two years and if they still can't perform then it's time to go in a new direction. But I'll be surprised if this team with the amount of talent doesn't get over the top by then.
IF he's not in the top half of the B1G next year you could be right....but IF he keeps all the kids here now on board and finds a really good guard to go with Glynn we could be good next year.I really doubt Miles makes it two more if he continues down the current path. Next year is very likely sink or swim.
Yeah, I can see that. I do remember most people saying NU would be better off without him too.This year, with our lack of shooting and Webster drives to the bucket, I think that he would have had a great chance with him at NU.
I do remember most people saying NU would be better off without him too.
I agree with this. Likely, NU would have a better record with Andrew on the floor - probably picks up one or two more wins already, though likely same losses to UCLA, Creighton and KU, but by the end of the year, the experience the team will have built up will be well worth the one year of a few more losses by positioning them to be much better next season.From a win/loss record, no. From a team/program standpoint, yes.
I agree with this. Likely, NU would have a better record with Andrew on the floor - probably picks up one or two more wins already, though likely same losses to UCLA, Creighton and KU, but by the end of the year, the experience the team will have built up will be well worth the one year of a few more losses by positioning them to be much better next season.
I wish people would quit bashing the basketball program every moment they get and realize this team has a LOT of talent that needs to develop a bit more. These are not KU, Kentucky, Duke type players that will be stars when they step on campus, but the nucleus is much stronger now than it has been maybe in the entire Miles and Doc tenure. Give it some time to develop and enjoy it when it pays off.This is EXACTLY how historically bad teams build. It takes time. You'll enjoy it more if you were supportive during these years vs. all the bashing you do. Because the alternative leaves you with having to say "well, I'm pleasantly surprised by this" vs. saying "I was with them during the bad times and good".
I agree with this. Likely, NU would have a better record with Andrew on the floor - probably picks up one or two more wins already, though likely same losses to UCLA, Creighton and KU, but by the end of the year, the experience the team will have built up will be well worth the one year of a few more losses by positioning them to be much better next season.
I wish people would quit bashing the basketball program every moment they get and realize this team has a LOT of talent that needs to develop a bit more. These are not KU, Kentucky, Duke type players that will be stars when they step on campus, but the nucleus is much stronger now than it has been maybe in the entire Miles and Doc tenure. Give it some time to develop and enjoy it when it pays off.This is EXACTLY how historically bad teams build. It takes time. You'll enjoy it more if you were supportive during these years vs. all the bashing you do. Because the alternative leaves you with having to say "well, I'm pleasantly surprised by this" vs. saying "I was with them during the bad times and good".
So tell me why or how Chris Collins can take over a team, that has never been to the NCAA tournament. That had won 13 games the year before he arrived. Recruits only 3 and an ocassional 4 star players. Plays in a 65 year old arena that holds 8100 people. Little to no turnover, majority happened after year 2 when 4 players left. Built the program with high school recruits, not transfers or JUCOs
But in 3 years surpassed Miles in both win/loss record and head to head.
You can't tell me that Northwestern's athletic support is on par with Nebraska's.
Steady improvement
14-19
15-17
20-12 (swept season series from Nebraska)
7-2 to start this season with a 2 point loss at #18 Butler and a 4 point loss against #22 Notre Dame. Wins over Wake Forest, Texas, DePaul.
People get behind that. There is a plan there.
So tell me why or how Chris Collins can take over a team, that has never been to the NCAA tournament. That had won 13 games the year before he arrived. Recruits only 3 and an ocassional 4 star players. Plays in a 65 year old arena that holds 8100 people. Little to no turnover, majority happened after year 2 when 4 players left. Built the program with high school recruits, not transfers or JUCOs
But in 3 years surpassed Miles in both win/loss record and head to head.
You can't tell me that Northwestern's athletic support is on par with Nebraska's.
Steady improvement
14-19
15-17
20-12 (swept season series from Nebraska)
7-2 to start this season with a 2 point loss at #18 Butler and a 4 point loss against #22 Notre Dame. Wins over Wake Forest, Texas, DePaul.
People get behind that. There is a plan there.
Ah, the Chris Collins love. The same Chris Collins who won 20 games but didn't end up in the dance. Yippee! That's awesome, 20 wins!! Wait, Miles made the dance in the same time frame but hey, a better win/loss record is more important. Wait, since post-season doesn't matter, Miles has a winning record against Izzo therefore, he's the better coach. With a plan!
10th place, 10th place, 9th place. Great results!
Texas, the same Texas that lost at home to UT-Arlington. Heck of a win, Chris.
DePaul, goodness, Rutgers beat them. Rutgers! Heck of a win, Chris.
KenPom doesn't think too highly of Northwestern's schedule.
That is all true but NW does seem to be trending more upward than NU at the moment.
That is all true but NW does seem to be trending more upward than NU at the moment.
Doesn't matter. He is a Miles apologist.
He is a Miles apologist
I guess I am not even sure what each coaches records are...I would guess Miles is a little better over that time frame.From a win/loss record, no. From a team/program standpoint, yes.