ADVERTISEMENT

130th in Redzone Scoring Offense

king_kong_

College Football Hall of Fame
Gold Member
Nov 4, 2021
23,740
33,797
113
67.86%.

only 28 teams visit the redzone more often than us yet only 3 score less often.

we've made 32 trips so far and come away with just 17 TDs. we're 5-8 in red zone FGAs.

10 completely empty redzone possessions. at or near tops in the country.

probably worth its own thread.
 
puke GIF
 
When was the last time we actually had a decent red zone offense? A better OL would help out here. I also think a lack of confidence in our FG units puts added pressure on the play caller. The result is usually no good

I really think it’s as simple as 2 things… Offense line play and the kicking game/special teams. We have been consistently average to below average in those areas for a long time. You make field goals and you run the ball effectively you’ll score in the red zone. Obviously identifying the problem is a lot easier than solving it, but that’s why these guys make all that money. Time to earn it and figure this shit out guys…
 
67.86%.

only 28 teams visit the redzone more often than us yet only 3 score less often.

we've made 32 trips so far and come away with just 17 TDs. we're 5-8 in red zone FGAs.

10 completely empty redzone possessions. at or near tops in the country.

probably worth its own thread.
Can we say satt is the issue?
 
67.86%.

only 28 teams visit the redzone more often than us yet only 3 score less often.

we've made 32 trips so far and come away with just 17 TDs. we're 5-8 in red zone FGAs.

10 completely empty redzone possessions. at or near tops in the country.

probably worth its own thread.
Unacceptable
 
Go back and watch the 4th and 1 goal line play against OSU. If we run ANY play besides iso over RG we could have moonwalked in for a TD. OSU sent all 11 defenders to that spot, knowing exactly what Satt was going to call.
Stealing play calls from the helmet coms?
 
Similar to yards per play, I’m sure that’s a statistical category that Satt knows nothing about nor has a goal in mind.
Why would he have an expectation of measuring productivity/efficiency?
The $1.5 million is for “other stuff”.

While I don’t know the numbers, it seems they get real hesitant throwing once they get in the red zone.
 
Go back and watch the 4th and 1 goal line play against OSU. If we run ANY play besides iso over RG we could have moonwalked in for a TD. OSU sent all 11 defenders to that spot, knowing exactly what Satt was going to call.
The problem I have with that play call is that according to Rhule, they thought the ball was going be spotted closer to the goal line than it was. So, when the previous play was over, they called a play where the running back leaps toward the end zone. That might have worked had the ball actually been spotted where they thought it was going to be spotted. When the ball was spotted farther away from the goal line, Rhule should have called a timeout to change the play call. He didn’t, and it cost them a touchdown … and possibly the game.
 
Last edited:
The problem I have with that play call is that according to Rhule, they thought the ball was going be spotted closer to the goal line than it was. So, when the previous play was over, they called a play where the running back leaps toward the end zone. That might have worked had the ball actually been spotted where they thought it was going to be spotted. When the ball was spotted farther away from the goal line, Rhule should have called a timeout to change the play call. He didn’t, and it cost them a touchdown … and possibly the game.

So obvious that they pointed it out on the broadcast. Horrible decision.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: king_kong_
The problem I have with that play call is that according to Rhule, they thought the ball was going be spotted closer to the goal line than it was. So, when the previous play was over, they called a play where the running back leaps toward the end zone. That might have worked had the ball actually been spotted where they thought it was going to be spotted. When the ball was spotted farther away from the goal line, Rhule should have called a timeout to change the play call. He didn’t, and it cost them a touchdown … and possibly the game.
Man

Rhule’s in-game coaching continues to confound

And cost us dearly

Makes me wonder if his headset even works
 
The problem I have with that play call is that according to Rhule, they thought the ball was going be spotted closer to the goal line than it was. So, when the previous play was over, they called a play where the running back leaps toward the end zone. That might have worked had the ball actually been spotted where they thought it was going to be spotted. When the ball was spotted farther away from the goal line, Rhule should have called a timeout to change the play call. He didn’t, and it cost them a touchdown … and possibly the game.
When your OC can talk to the QB up to the 15 second mark… no one noticed where the ball was spotted until when??
Rhule only noticed under 15 sec of the play clock?
Satt didn’t notice?
I mean, bad spot or not, you’re given time to see where you’re at, so it sounds like a lame excuse.
 
Stealing play calls from the helmet coms?
Has coach Rhule commented on that?

Our the communications encrypted or not. When I heard that I wondered if Indiana had our calls.
 
the best prescription for a redzone is a rushing attack..but at least a feild goal game established.
 
67.86%.

only 28 teams visit the redzone more often than us yet only 3 score less often.

we've made 32 trips so far and come away with just 17 TDs. we're 5-8 in red zone FGAs.

10 completely empty redzone possessions. at or near tops in the country.

probably worth its own thread.
This stat is squarely on the shoulders of Matt Rhule and his OC Marcus Satterfield.
 
When was the last time we actually had a decent red zone offense? A better OL would help out here. I also think a lack of confidence in our FG units puts added pressure on the play caller. The result is usually no good
Maybe we should have Tom call the plays as I believe that was the last time, the Huskers had a truly good play caller.
 
I really think it’s as simple as 2 things… Offense line play and the kicking game/special teams. We have been consistently average to below average in those areas for a long time. You make field goals and you run the ball effectively you’ll score in the red zone. Obviously identifying the problem is a lot easier than solving it, but that’s why these guys make all that money. Time to earn it and figure this shit out guys…
Well, teams scout and watch tape for a reason. Every defense is prepped for certain situations and sets and SATT either can't teach well enough to be multiple enough or they are afraid of the learning curve for Dylan or the other players...considering most of our wrs and one rb is new to the program...just think of all of the times that teams have had big runs on 4th and one because they run a play-action bootleg or bring a wr in reverse or run a trick play. Fans want us to just ram it in there but when we do it gets stuffed because big 10 defenses aren't little, and they are division 1 players who can memorize 25 plays in 5 sets from film. Even the no-name fcs teams had physical guys and we could just ram it against them.

PS: As great as TOs teams were on offense at times...he was still regarded as the best tactical play-caller in the entire sport. And his teams were extremely difficult to prepare for...even with almost no nfl talent, and often just a bunch of Nebraska kids. If something doesn't work it is always on the coach. Ball don't lie.
 
Strong words from Mike'l Severe on Satterfield.
Severe hit the nail on the head with the lack of scheming WRs open. Satterfield literally runs a high school offense with little to no motion to get receivers open.

At least Severe is putting this out here now and not waiting for $h!t to hit the fan like it did with Frost.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC and V-Doub
Lining up in shotgun formation inside the 5 yard line is a big part of the reason for the ineptitude. Scott Frost also tried this when he was here.
 
67.86%.

only 28 teams visit the redzone more often than us yet only 3 score less often.

we've made 32 trips so far and come away with just 17 TDs. we're 5-8 in red zone FGAs.

10 completely empty redzone possessions. at or near tops in the country.

probably worth its own thread.
Yeah, that's a problem. We really need to be able to run the damn ball more consistently.

Side note, we seem to lead the league in getting tripped up and tackled before scoring from beyond the red zone.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT