Zatechka and Travis Justice talk spring game. Rob thinks Haarberg has improved and thus unfortunately can't be used as much in a Taysom Hill type way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The QBs didn’t have to take hits and there were multiple passes completed that would have been sacks in a live game. Don’t draw too much from some of the stats.If the offense can throw the ball as well as they did in the Spring game they won’t need a Taysom Hill package for HH. RBs should be able to pick up easy yards with defenses playing well off the LOS.
Still puts into question how much they value the QB run game moving forward. I think it’s high time they coordinate an offense that doesn’t rely on QBs to be the leading rusher.
Just getting the QBs to average over 150 yards per game would be a huge improvement. I’m just curious how much the QB run game will be in the mix this year. When it comes to that HH is far and away the clear winner here, just as DR is in the passing game.The QBs didn’t have to take hits and there were multiple passes completed that would have been sacks in a live game. Don’t draw too much from some of the stats.
assuming you are talking HH . Dylan was in no danger of a sack he feels pressure and move accordingly.The QBs didn’t have to take hits and there were multiple passes completed that would have been sacks in a live game. Don’t draw too much from some of the stats.
The QBs didn’t have to take hits and there were multiple passes completed that would have been sacks in a live game. Don’t draw too much from some of the stats.
Silly post dingle, sorry. You are assuming each time a defender got close that it would be a sack. There were several plays were Haarburg would have trucked a single defender and ran for 10 plus. There were also several plays were the QB stayed in the pocket when in a game situation they would have sprinted out and looked for a receiver. When the game isn't totally live, there will be could have, would have, should haves on both sides of the equation.The QBs didn’t have to take hits and there were multiple passes completed that would have been sacks in a live game. Don’t draw too much from some of the stats.
There were multiple plays where defenders literally got to the QB, put their hands in the air and stopped. They ABSOLUTELY would have been sacks. It’s not at all silly. In addition, a QB that isn’t worried about getting hit isn’t as likely to rush his release and make bad throws. I was overall pretty happy with what I saw from the QBs but it needs to be kept in perspective.Silly post dingle, sorry. You are assuming each time a defender got close that it would be a sack. There were several plays were Haarburg would have trucked a single defender and ran for 10 plus. There were also several plays were the QB stayed in the pocket when in a game situation they would have sprinted out and looked for a receiver. When the game isn't totally live, there will be could have, would have, should haves on both sides of the equation.
I posted that earlier. Kaelin was the main one who would have gotten hit. I like the way Raiola floats inside the pocket. It looks instinctive.I am
assuming you are talking HH . Dylan was in no danger of a sack he feels pressure and move accordingly.
DR was sacked on the scramble play to Flynt by #90I am
assuming you are talking HH . Dylan was in no danger of a sack he feels pressure and move accordingly.