How bad is Maryland? Are they the worst team on our schedule?
Northwestern and Rutgers are pretty bad this year. So, I would suggest "NO" is the answer to your original question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How bad is Maryland? Are they the worst team on our schedule?
Wow...are you drunk? I’m fine my man. Purdue BEAT Maryland 40-14. If Purdue was that bad, Maryland would have won and blew them out. But that’s not the case...so again, who’s not getting it??? Simply put, Purdue is better then Maryland. Not the other way around. Hell Purdue put up dam near 560 total yards of offense against Maryland and their defense.
Nebraska should easily cover. I see something like 27-10Maryland is horrendous. Worse than Northwestern IMO. Nebraska will win be 3 tds
This gives it pretty well a 50/50http://www.ncaagamesim.com/fb_GameS...AwayYear=2020&hs=1&HomeFieldAdv=1&hSchedule=0How bad is Maryland? Are they the worst team on our schedule?
This gives it pretty well a 50/50http://www.ncaagamesim.com/fb_GameS...AwayYear=2020&hs=1&HomeFieldAdv=1&hSchedule=0
Yes I would take this one at -5.5Maryland is horrendous. Worse than Northwestern IMO. Nebraska will win be 3 tds
Most of the time we’re the worst team on our schedule. If we just clean some things up, we could actually be a good team.How bad is Maryland? Are they the worst team on our schedule?
But other threads say we have no talent?We had enough talent to have won most of our games. We had no business losing to Purdue, Indiana, or Colorado yet we lost. We also should have blown out South Alabama whose 1-9 this year yet we almost lost.
Are we more talented than Maryland? EASILY
Will we win Saturday? DOUBTFUL
We had enough talent to have won most of our games. We had no business losing to Purdue, Indiana, or Colorado yet we lost. We also should have blown out South Alabama whose 1-9 this year yet we almost lost.
Are we more talented than Maryland? EASILY
Will we win Saturday? DOUBTFUL
My claim that we have more talent than Indiana, Purdue, Colorado, and South Alabama is based off of recruiting. I have a hard time believing that we have bottom feeder talent to match our bottom feeder results when we have out recruited teams beating us year after year.But other threads say we have no talent?
Now we are a whopping 4 point favorite. With our wonderful road record, it seems about right to me.laugh my hairy pickle off, Purdue blows. They’re so bad that we’re a whopping 5 1/2 point favorite. We had zero reason to lose the P game, yet found a way. As I said before, as long as we don’t suck, we win, but we seem to find creative ways to let crappy teams hang around until we just roll over and die.
You'll win by 21. They have a couple good running backs but nothing else. If Nebraska loses to them seriously, just shut it down.Now we are a whopping 4 point favorite. With our wonderful road record, it seems about right to me.
so are we...
transitive property rarely accurate.......just saying.
Wow! Tell us more!
Actually of the guys that actually played in the game AND the 2 deeps, I would bet that Indiana, Purdue and Colorado all played with guys with a higher average star ranking than Nebraska. I KNOW that was the case with Purdue in the recent past. Not sure about this year but I would think with all of the walk ons we've got starting and on the 2 deep I would bet it was true this year as well. We've just had SO many washouts in our highest ranked upperclassmen.My claim that we have more talent than Indiana, Purdue, Colorado, and South Alabama is based off of recruiting. I have a hard time believing that we have bottom feeder talent to match our bottom feeder results when we have out recruited teams beating us year after year.
Mods please delete or modify if not allowed!
https://247sports.com/Season/2019-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/?Conference=Big-Ten
That link shows the Huskers current talent on the roster based on stars. The current Husker roster is 4th in the conference only behind Michigan, Ohio St, and Penn St who are doing very well. Purdue and Indiana are 12th and 13th in the country. Colorado and South Alabama are terrible and have recruited awful as well.
Also throw in that Purdue beat us with 2nd and 3rd string QBs and no Rondale Moore!! They were not more talented than us.
Posted that post out of frustration. We have the talent, just need to stop playing down to opponents. Especially in the 3rd qtr.
I'm not the one trying to convince the world that Nebraska is going to beat Maryland based on the result of the Purdue/ Maryland game.
Neither am I Captain Obvious
Then why are you responding to me Captain Douchenozzle?
But other threads say we have no talent?
My claim that we have more talent than Indiana, Purdue, Colorado, and South Alabama is based off of recruiting. I have a hard time believing that we have bottom feeder talent to match our bottom feeder results when we have out recruited teams beating us year after year.
Mods please delete or modify if not allowed!
https://247sports.com/Season/2019-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/?Conference=Big-Ten
That link shows the Huskers current talent on the roster based on stars. The current Husker roster is 4th in the conference only behind Michigan, Ohio St, and Penn St who are doing very well. Purdue and Indiana are 12th and 13th in the country. Colorado and South Alabama are terrible and have recruited awful as well.
Also throw in that Purdue beat us with 2nd and 3rd string QBs and no Rondale Moore!! They were not more talented than us.
Posted that post out of frustration. We have the talent, just need to stop playing down to opponents. Especially in the 3rd qtr.
That link I listed was actually referencing the average stars of our current roster vs the rest of the conference. We still rank towards the top of the B1G even with all the guys who have left. We have more 4 stars currently starting then both Indiana and Purdue have even recruited over that past 5 years!Actually of the guys that actually played in the game AND the 2 deeps, I would bet that Indiana, Purdue and Colorado all played with guys with a higher average star ranking than Nebraska. I KNOW that was the case with Purdue in the recent past. Not sure about this year but I would think with all of the walk ons we've got starting and on the 2 deep I would bet it was true this year as well. We've just had SO many washouts in our highest ranked upperclassmen.
It’s low because sharp gamblers have made a fortune this year betting against Nebraska. 1-9 ATS all year. That is as bad as it gets. And the sharps aren’t about to start taking Nebraska after a run like this.I'll spell it out for you. It doesn't matter whether or not Purdue is better than Maryland. What does matter is that Purdue sucks ass and after it was apparent that we were going to roll, we, time after time, tripped over ourselves and, ultimately, fell on our face in that game. The way this year has gone and how poorly this team has played for much of it, acting like we're going to stomp these guys because Purdue team beat them badly is juvenile. Could we take it to them? Sure we could, but I'm not expecting it to happen because of the way that the team has played. The results of a lot of our games have been due more to our poor play than how the opposition has played. If you still aren't getting it, a good example to look at is S. Alabama. They aren't in the zip code of being considered a decent team, but we struggled in that game because of the way we played. Answer me this, what's the spread on this game right now? 5 or so? If we are clearly so much better than them, why is it so low?
It’s low because sharp gamblers have made a fortune this year betting against Nebraska. 1-9 ATS all year. That is as bad as it gets. And the sharps aren’t about to start taking Nebraska after a run like this.
That’s a consideration for it dropping, but the line was set at 7 or so? The experts in Vegas directly contradicting the poster’s who are acting like this is a no-brainer easy win.
Actually, Vegas likely did take Nebraska's lousy road record and value against the spread into account. The line should be closer to Nebraska - 11 or 12.
I’m sure they did. Still set at 7.
Uh oh. Cornicator doing some chest thumping ITT. Certain loss for NU now.
I don't like you. That's why.
you're right about the sharps, but it's not predicated on past results. classic gambler's fallacy thinking. each bet's odds are not swayed by previous bets; they are on their own entirely.It’s low because sharp gamblers have made a fortune this year betting against Nebraska. 1-9 ATS all year. That is as bad as it gets. And the sharps aren’t about to start taking Nebraska after a run like this.
How bad is Maryland? Are they the worst team on our schedule?
Illinois is +15.5, I like Illinois to coverAnyone taking Illinois at -15.5?
Fixed it, Hawks win but 15 seems high.Illinois is +15.5, I like Illinois to cover