The right side of our O line was leaky at best in pass pro.....but all in all a very good game. Maryland has D-1 players that are tough to block too.
Well it seems you all want to build up Maryland, to make the win look better than it is. I mean the title of the thread is all about butt kissing DL, so I'm just stating that the Maryland team is a much different team than the Ohio State team, and we saw two different results. So, not sure what is up with your attitude Captain Brown Nose.
So, the fact that Maryland isn't as good as the #2 TEAM IN THE NATION changes the fact he called a good game with a former walk on in his 2nd career start?? Gotcha, carry on....
I don't get it. So nothing else matters except Ohio State? He called a good game today, with a backup QB, against the team on the schedule.
Posts like his after a good win on senior day against a team that will probably be bowl bound are the reason I cant stand our "fans" most of the time. Enjoy the win and get off your high horse bud.
Nope, you criticized Dingle when he made a slight remark about the O-Line and then said how they were 1 win away from being bowl eligible... you're trying to act like it was bigger than what it was.So, the fact that Maryland isn't as good as the #2 TEAM IN THE NATION changes the fact he called a good game with a former walk on in his 2nd career start?? Gotcha, carry on....
Gotta say, it seems like you look for stuff to call out... Just quit now and you won't get buried much more...
Quit while you're not ahead. You might like this song written about your boy Nikkisixx
What are you talking about?Quit while you're not ahead. You might like this song written about your boy Nikkisixx
And you jumped into my thread congratulating the seniors and said Langs called a good game and you chime in with Nope, Ohio State, blah, blah...now run along I'm done with you.
It was in response to "let that sink in", "i.e. nope, maryland is not like some great team and compare today with what we saw with tOSU"
Just reread the entire thread... no one was calling this a great win... at the same time, what was being stated is Maryland isn't bottom of the barrel either. This was a decent win where we, for all intents and purposes, shut them down, with our backup QB. Then you jumped in with your Ohio State smack, but I'm not sure why it belongs here.
I re-read it too.. starts off mentioning DL (I wonder why), but otherwise it's fine, then a person mentions the D-Line, and immediately the response is to lift up this win by remarking how they are not bottom of the barrel as you say, and then it's like oh yeah, some bandwagon talk about let's think about how this is a good win, and then I said nope, I'm not letting that sink in, you guys need to compare this game with tOSU game. The truth is likely somewhere in between.
I think Conrad is just better than Knevel. yes, its good having the band back together again. Kinda nice getting healthy this late in the season.
Most definitely it's somewhere in between... I guess I thought it was a little over the top to take a congratulatory thread and try to throw water on it by saying you can't call this a good win.
I just looked up the prediction thread, having taken my own advice. You predicted Maryland to win 38-17??? And you say this isn't a good win?
I had originally picked it 14 to 9 in our favor. I changed it after Cornicator spoke about the new QB they were going to play, which is not the guy they ended up playing.
Just above...
yeah, in my summary, okay.. but it wasn't in the original exchange.
In spite of your original prediction of a Nebraska victory, I just don't understand why you are arguing against this so much... Your final prediction, which is the prediction we must count, was a 21 point loss. We won by 21 points. 42 point difference, and you are still here, only to be contrarian, it seems. This was my initial point, and it seems to be true the longer this thread goes on...
It had nothing to do with the final score. The way I saw it, we looked great against a bad team, so I didn't feel like as fans, we should be building up that team to make ourselves look better. It's very rare you can critique anything on this board without the certain group coming after you. It's was evident in this thread how quickly a person is jumped on if they don't agree. I am absolutely contrarian, and props to you for noticing that. It is of value to have someone with the opposite viewpoint, at least I think so sometimes.. on here, not so much I guess.
I get where you're coming from... And differing viewpoints can be healthy, no doubt. Probably the timing of your comments had something to do with the avalanche that followed, as well as other unpopular stances you have taken in the past.
