Tucker Carlson holding the line by mocking military service members

Huskermatt23

Graduate Assistant
Gold Member
Jan 11, 2017
5,518
11,343
113
Seattle
Status quo for Trumpers and their attack on the US military and the people who choose to give up their freedoms and possibly their lives to ensure everyone is safe and can maintain their rights.


The attack by the right on the military and those who served started under Joseph McCarthy, it was picked up by Trump and continued by his minions.

Do you have no sense of decency?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bldhuskerred

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
Anyone born yesterday would believe you. OTOH, there's people who have even a loose grasp of history that can see right through your fake news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1160

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house




Who are pro-military again? Calling our brave men and women who have fought for our country "baby killers"? Who aims to defund our military, Republicans or Democrats? You're a joke.
 

burntorange72

First Team All-Big Ten
Gold Member
Mar 9, 2004
3,701
2,478
113
Status quo for Trumpers and their attack on the US military and the people who choose to give up their freedoms and possibly their lives to ensure everyone is safe and can maintain their rights.


The attack by the right on the military and those who served started under Joseph McCarthy, it was picked up by Trump and continued by his minions.

Do you have no sense of decency?
I just happened to watch Tucker Carlson yesterday. I don’t think this column is a fair take on what Carlson said. And his push back was more against the military leadership than the military establishment. One point I recall was his concern Biden was proud of the military developing flight suits for pregnant pilots when he thought Biden should be more concerned about Chinese building more war ships and feeling strong enough to challenge us in the Pacific.
His point was that it was not the military’s purpose to make soilders feel good. The military s purpose is to deter war but if war comes, to win.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
So to clarify you're ok with what Tucker Carlson says about women in the military?
You know what he was saying. Our military is soft, has been because of 8 years of Obama. Politicizing the military is a pathetic tactic of the left.
I'm not against them having uniforms for females, and neither is Tucker. I'm against the priorities of this military when it comes to making "inclusiveness" the priority over readiness.
 

Huskermatt23

Graduate Assistant
Gold Member
Jan 11, 2017
5,518
11,343
113
Seattle
I just happened to watch Tucker Carlson yesterday. I don’t think this column is a fair take on what Carlson said. And his push back was more against the military leadership than the military establishment. One point I recall was his concern Biden was proud of the military developing flight suits for pregnant pilots when he thought Biden should be more concerned about Chinese building more war ships and feeling strong enough to challenge us in the Pacific.
His point was that it was not the military’s purpose to make soilders feel good. The military s purpose is to deter war but if war comes, to win.
Soooooo why bash women in the military then? He couldn't make that point otherwise? Hes just a pussy who never wore a uniform, just like Trump, talking crap about the people who actually sacrifice for our nation. The right thinks those people are losers. I take offense to it as a former member of the military.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
Soooooo why bash women in the military then? He couldn't make that point otherwise? Hes just a pussy who never wore a uniform, just like Trump, talking crap about the people who actually sacrifice for our nation. The right thinks those people are losers. I take offense to it as a former member of the military.
I'm a veteran and I'm ok with what he's saying. You don't speak for all veterans.
 

sklarbodds

Administrator
Moderator
Nov 30, 2006
32,683
38,491
113
Biden should be more concerned about Chinese building more war ships and feeling strong enough to challenge us in the Pacific.
LOL what a joke.

There is absolutely zero countries that could even begin to challenge the US on water. Legit if the entire world engaged us in a water battle, the US still might win. That's how bad we absolutely dwarf anyone's else water capabilities.
 

burntorange72

First Team All-Big Ten
Gold Member
Mar 9, 2004
3,701
2,478
113
Soooooo why bash women in the military then? He couldn't make that point otherwise? Hes just a pussy who never wore a uniform, just like Trump, talking crap about the people who actually sacrifice for our nation. The right thinks those people are losers. I take offense to it as a former member of the military.
I don’t know what Carlson said earlier in the week to get this started, but last night, Thursday night, I didn’t hear him say anything that would be considered to bash women, or women pilots.

last night he made the point the military has been, is and must be a meritocracy. To protect the country and win the wars if they come you want the best of the best doing the fighting. Those with the skill get promoted. That is why Colin Powell in a time of what many feel was rampant racial prejudice in the country was able to succeed in the military. Carlson went on the say if pregnant women are the best pilots they should be flying the planes, but if (and I’m paraphrasing) they are fling to make someone feel good or the fill quota that’s wrong.

did you even watch the first 15 minutes of Carlson?
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house

cavalot

Head Coach
Gold Member
Oct 3, 2003
12,650
9,332
113
You know what he was saying. Our military is soft, has been because of 8 years of Obama. Politicizing the military is a pathetic tactic of the left.
I'm not against them having uniforms for females, and neither is Tucker. I'm against the priorities of this military when it comes to making "inclusiveness" the priority over readiness.

Our military is soft? Because of Obama? LOL... Well Trump had 4 years to "Toughen em up," I guess... Looks like he must have dropped another ball.
 

cavalot

Head Coach
Gold Member
Oct 3, 2003
12,650
9,332
113
U sure about that boss?


So What? Every country of power has enough nuc power to end this world a thousand times over. So China has more ships and bigger and better ones? Wooooooo scary.

Look at this graphic and tell me we should be shaking in our boots. Maybe we need to analyze our wasteful military spending. China seems to do more with less according to you and Tucker.

countries-with-the-highest-military-spending.jpg
 

sklarbodds

Administrator
Moderator
Nov 30, 2006
32,683
38,491
113
U sure about that boss?

100%

In tonnage we have more than the next 7 countries combined.

The military asking for more money doesn't change that.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
100%

In tonnage we have more than the next 7 countries combined.

The military asking for more money doesn't change that.
You weigh military effectiveness by tonnage? Is that how you determine the effectiveness of your team at work? "Hey everybody, let's step on this scale and figure out how much we can get done this week".
 

burntorange72

First Team All-Big Ten
Gold Member
Mar 9, 2004
3,701
2,478
113
LOL what a joke.

There is absolutely zero countries that could even begin to challenge the US on water. Legit if the entire world engaged us in a water battle, the US still might win. That's how bad we absolutely dwarf anyone's else water capabilities.

I think the real concern is not that China could win but that they might feel bold enough to try. And if they try where that could lead.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
So What? Every country of power has enough nuc power to end this world a thousand times over. So China has more ships and bigger and better ones? Wooooooo scary.

Look at this graphic and tell me we should be shaking in our boots. Maybe we need to analyze our wasteful military spending. China seems to do more with less according to you and Tucker.

countries-with-the-highest-military-spending.jpg
I agree with you. Let's eliminate ALL fraud, waste, and abuse in all areas of our government, not just the military.

And also, when you're talking about nukes, you're talking about last-resort options. I would be more worried about a dirty bomb going off in Manhattan than another nation-state nuking us.
 

EriktheRed

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2001
8,329
7,138
113
So to clarify you're ok with what Tucker Carlson says about women in the military?

Did you watch that clip at all or just a complete idiotic troll? Biden responded to the advanced new Chinese weapons with we have tailored body armor and flight suits for women. The response by Biden makes our country look like a complete joke.
 

EriktheRed

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2001
8,329
7,138
113
Why the hell would anyone back Tucker Carlson? Even Fox news and it's shit bag lawyers told a judge and the world that the guy is completely full of shit.

Because of people missing the point like you that's why.

We should have the most lethal military and that should be the goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countrybob

cavalot

Head Coach
Gold Member
Oct 3, 2003
12,650
9,332
113
I agree with you. Let's eliminate ALL fraud, waste, and abuse in all areas of our government, not just the military.

And also, when you're talking about nukes, you're talking about last-resort options. I would be more worried about a dirty bomb going off in Manhattan than another nation-state nuking us.

Exactly so why should we be worried about China's Navy?

This country spends too much on the military, and that didn't change under Obama, so to blame him for our "softness" is asinine.

This says it best when it comes to American priorities. And this was from the 1930's. Some shit never changes.

2jz8vex6re461.jpg
 

cavalot

Head Coach
Gold Member
Oct 3, 2003
12,650
9,332
113
Because of people missing the point like you that's why.

We should have the most lethal military and that should be the goal.

And we do! And nothing Tucker is spewing is going to change the facts. But it does F*&^ with the rational thinking abilities of his listeners.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
Unless you think an aircraft carrier is outmanned by a fishing boat, yeah.
Who was the aircraft carrier and who was the fishing boat in the Revolutionary War?
Who was the aircraft carrier and who was the fishing boat in Vietnam?
You sound like you're in the trench warfare mindset. It's a new era my friend.
 

EriktheRed

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2001
8,329
7,138
113
And we do! And nothing Tucker is spewing is going to change the facts. But it does F*&^ with the rational thinking abilities of his listeners.

Did you even watch the clip? Biden's response is embarrassing. The title of this thread is also fraudulent. Tucker wasn't mocking military members. He was mocking a response about an increased threat by the Chinese. There's a time and place to state that information, but that was NOT the time or the place.
 

Oldschool1964

Offensive Coordinator
Gold Member
Jun 27, 2009
8,463
7,407
113
116
Your mom's house
Exactly so why should we be worried about China's Navy?

This country spends too much on the military, and that didn't change under Obama, so to blame him for our "softness" is asinine.

This says it best when it comes to American priorities. And this was from the 1930's. Some shit never changes.

2jz8vex6re461.jpg
Look, and I've said this before, we depend on our military (and so does the world) on much more than just executing war. If you want the US to help out when it comes to tsunami, earthquakes, peacekeeping and peacemaking, foreign aid, disaster relief, etc, then you have to fund those operations. We seem to be the only country in the world who has the capability and the want to help out when shit goes south around the world. We can get pallets of food and water to refugees when the shit hits the fan. You scream when we don't help the poor, yet you want to cut the funding now that we've taken up that mantle for everyone else.

There's places to cut in the military. I have no doubt about that, but to reach back to the 1930's in order to prove your point, especially now that you have the hindsight of what they were dealing with the Nazi threat and the Pacific front looming is just retarded. You claim to be a veteran, but did you really study history? Sounds like you were a grunt who turned wrenches on jeeps or checked IDs at the gate.
 

cavalot

Head Coach
Gold Member
Oct 3, 2003
12,650
9,332
113
Look, and I've said this before, we depend on our military (and so does the world) on much more than just executing war. If you want the US to help out when it comes to tsunami, earthquakes, peacekeeping and peacemaking, foreign aid, disaster relief, etc, then you have to fund those operations. We seem to be the only country in the world who has the capability and the want to help out when shit goes south around the world. We can get pallets of food and water to refugees when the shit hits the fan. You scream when we don't help the poor, yet you want to cut the funding now that we've taken up that mantle for everyone else.

There's places to cut in the military. I have no doubt about that, but to reach back to the 1930's in order to prove your point, especially now that you have the hindsight of what they were dealing with the Nazi threat and the Pacific front looming is just retarded. You claim to be a veteran, but did you really study history? Sounds like you were a grunt who turned wrenches on jeeps or checked IDs at the gate.

LOL I never claimed to be a veteran. Wrong person.
 

Tahoe78

Blackshirt
Gold Member
May 10, 2009
3,210
3,221
113
71
Pagosa Springs Colo
Status quo for Trumpers and their attack on the US military and the people who choose to give up their freedoms and possibly their lives to ensure everyone is safe and can maintain their rights.


The attack by the right on the military and those who served started under Joseph McCarthy, it was picked up by Trump and continued by his minions.

Do you have no sense of decency?
You are so full of Cr!p.. Nobody has supported the Vets like Trump.. Only president that was getting us out of the Mideast dependency of oil... Help all of us Vets with the VA.. I am personally tired of this garbage from the Libs and Socialist... P.S. I have 36 months combat duty in Vietnam and know all of what has transpired.. so don't give me any of your garbage.. Usually I wouldn't respond to to post like this, but enough is enough.
 

Huskermatt23

Graduate Assistant
Gold Member
Jan 11, 2017
5,518
11,343
113
Seattle
You are so full of Cr!p.. Nobody has supported the Vets like Trump.. Only president that was getting us out of the Mideast dependency of oil... Help all of us Vets with the VA.. I am personally tired of this garbage from the Libs and Socialist... P.S. I have 36 months combat duty in Vietnam and know all of what has transpired.. so don't give me any of your garbage.. Usually I wouldn't respond to to post like this, but enough is enough.

Cool story. I had 18 months combat fighting a war your last republican president got us into chasing down WMDs that never existed.

Is this what you mean by Trump supporting our troops? You mean he "supports" Russia putting bounties on the head of US Troops and does nothing about it? Only fake news is what you are spouting.

 

DRay827

Senior
Gold Member
Aug 28, 2016
2,211
4,563
113
Lincoln, NE
Status quo for Trumpers and their attack on the US military and the people who choose to give up their freedoms and possibly their lives to ensure everyone is safe and can maintain their rights.


The attack by the right on the military and those who served started under Joseph McCarthy, it was picked up by Trump and continued by his minions.

Do you have no sense of decency?
Historically, I get all of my Defense and Military information from T.V. Dinner trust fund babies. So yes, I'm with Tucker.

Edit: Forgot to mention that I only believe things I hear from Coastal Elites and Tucker grew up in San Francisco and La Jolla, so you know he's telling the truth.
 
Last edited: