ADVERTISEMENT

So, Is Malik N or what?

airplane-movie-03.jpg
 
In normal people language, what does BLUE CHECK, I’M mean?
 
In normal people language, what does BLUE CHECK, I’M mean?
don't know much about twitter, but blue check means twitter has verified you are who you say you are.
if you look at where it says blue check I'm, then it shows N in the picture.
tea leaves say he is N. Our bag men must have beat out Texas State :D
 
In normal people language, what does BLUE CHECK, I’M mean?
don't know much about twitter, but blue check means twitter has verified you are who you say you are.
if you look at where it says blue check I'm, then it shows N in the picture.
tea leaves say he is N. Our bag men must have beat out Texas State :D
The words are song lyrics. The person who took this screen shot at the perfect time to capture what Dr. is saying. If you watch his Instagram story it continues on for another 10 seconds with more lyrics of that song being displayed on the screen replacing the "blue check, I'm"
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC
We did sign 6 HS OL this cycle.
Seriously? I had no idea. And this is coming from a guy who has followed recruiting closely for 40 years. Still, I have to ask... what is the ratio?

I'm supportive of the new staff. But what the hell is the point of bringing Malik in to be the 7th QB or 16th scholarship WR? Unless this "physical football" message is a bunch of B.S., then they don't need that many receivers. The days of running four and five receiver packages should be a thing of the past. Realistically, if the team is going to be physical with this offensive line, they should run a lot of 12 personnel, with some 22 or even 13 isn't ridiculous if they find enough tight ends that can play. And remember too that we've still got a few walk-ons who wouldn't embarrass themselves either.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BleedRed78
Seriously? I had no idea. And this is coming from a guy who has followed recruiting closely for 40 years. Still, I have to ask... what is the ratio?

I'm supportive of the new staff. But what the hell is the point of bringing Malik in to be the 7th QB or 16th scholarship WR? Unless this "physical football" message is a bunch of B.S., then they don't need that many receivers. The days of running four and five receiver packages should be a thing of the past. Realistically, if the team is going to be physical with this offensive line, they should run a lot of 12 personnel, with some 22 or even 13 isn't ridiculous if they find enough tight ends that can play. And remember too that we've still got a few walk-ons who wouldn't embarrass themselves either.
For all the hype about running the football the apparent fascination with recruiting receivers is somewhat puzzling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dean Pope
For all the hype about running the football the apparent fascination with recruiting receivers is somewhat puzzling.

We have good RB’s and have tried to add some portal OL. We are adding WR because that room wasn’t very good.

The handwringing over WR is honestly puzzling. We have added WR’s, but we also lost Palmer, Manning, Martin, Grimes, Crawford. We won’t have an unbalanced roster and carry too many WR’s, some guys on the current roster will hit the road after Spring ball.
 
We have good RB’s and have tried to add some portal OL. We are adding WR because that room wasn’t very good.

The handwringing over WR is honestly puzzling. We have added WR’s, but we also lost Palmer, Manning, Martin, Grimes, Crawford. We won’t have an unbalanced roster and carry too many WR’s, some guys on the current roster will hit the road after Spring ball.
All of the speedy WRs can always be gunners on kick coverage. Punt block, etc, They can flip to DB if they don't make it as a WR. Can never have too much speed.
 
All of the speedy WRs can always be gunners on kick coverage. Punt block, etc, They can flip to DB if they don't make it as a WR. Can never have too much speed.
I that happens- fandamntastic. But what that would be the opposite of what we've seen. Based on the last 10 years, I would say that (1) the young high upside guys get no reps in practice and consequently fail to learn a complicated passing system and (2) the offensive line gets exposed in passing situations since the new OC insists on blocking with five while sending out 4-5 WRs with a QB who only has time to make one read anyway.
 
All of the speedy WRs can always be gunners on kick coverage. Punt block, etc, They can flip to DB if they don't make it as a WR. Can never have too much speed.
No we can't. AND if they do ST and aren't afraid to hit, they'll be better receivers who don't mind blocking when called up
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT