ADVERTISEMENT

Should Mo be kicked off the team?

Should Mo be kicked off the team

  • Yes

    Votes: 153 44.7%
  • No

    Votes: 189 55.3%

  • Total voters
    342
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s ironic to me that all the “pitchfork” posters quit posting around the end of day time periods for most employees. Almost like they are spending they’re work days blogging.

Or, everything that needs to be discussed has been and there is no need to continue rehashing the same old stuff. But you feel free to claim “victory” if it makes you feel better.
 
The UNL code of conduct indicates that the university can take disciplinary action regardless of whether someone who has committed sexual assault has charges reduced or dropped. Thus, it appears that if he indeed violated the letter of the law, regardless of the intent, that the university can impose their own punishment if they so choose.

"1d. Sexual misconduct by or against a student may be investigated by the University whether it is alleged to have been committed on or off campus."

"1f. The University may pursue disciplinary action against a student at the same time the student is facing criminal charges for the same offense, even if the criminal prosecution is pending, or has been dismissed, or the charges have been reduced."

The curious thing will be to see if the code of conduct applies here. This is what it states:

"The Student Code applies to student conduct which occurs from the time of enrollment through the actual awarding of a degree, even if the conduct occurs prior to the start of classes or is discovered after a degree is awarded."

So when did he enroll? For an athlete, does that period of time start with the signing of the LOI?

https://studentconduct.unl.edu/student-code-conduct#appendix-A

Good question. I don't believe it would apply to Mo because he had not enrolled yet. He hadn't even been accepted at that point (was still working on grades/test scores).
 
It’s a good thing you’re not judge, jury and executioner, all our youth would be on death row for stealing candy bars..

Yes, because the charges of an adult (not a kid) possessing child pornography and then using it to get back at someone who he likely knew would be humiliated by getting the video sent to her is the absolute equivalent of lifting a candy bar as a minor.

Dismissing him from the University of Nebraska if found guilty of this is obviously proportionate to sentencing to death as well.

I personally find the legal system incredibly ineffective, corrupt and overly punitive in the US. It is often twisted to perpetuate systemic racism and disproportionately impacts the poor and minorities. However, with that said I do think that there have to be consequences for breaches of the law, if Washington did what he was accused of, I don't think he belongs as a student athlete at Nebraska.
 
Yes, because the charges of an adult (not a kid) possessing child pornography and then using it to get back at someone who he likely knew would be humiliated by getting the video sent to her is the absolute equivalent of lifting a candy bar as a minor.

Dismissing him from the University of Nebraska if found guilty of this is obviously proportionate to sentencing to death as well.

I personally find the legal system incredibly ineffective, corrupt and overly punitive in the US. It is often twisted to perpetuate systemic racism and disproportionately impacts the poor and minorities. However, with that said I do think that there have to be consequences for breaches of the law, if Washington did what he was accused of, I don't think he belongs as a student athlete at Nebraska.

But it’s completly ok to compare it to tax evasion and drunk driving...
 
Good question. I don't believe it would apply to Mo because he had not enrolled yet. He hadn't even been accepted at that point (was still working on grades/test scores).

Said I would not comment on this mess but.............

Seems to me when I studied school law several years, the courts ruled that schools could dismiss or keep a student out of their school based on something that happened prior their enrollment. The ruling, if I recall correctly, is that schools have a duty to protect people to a certain extent. To give an extreme case, a senior in HS gets convicted of rape or assault on a female, could be denied, and at the college I attended, it did indeed happen.
 
are you intimately familiar with the family or their history, or are you visualizing it in your crystal ball?
During his recruitment it’s was stated he lacked a father figure and discipline. My crystal balls says your screen name is perfect. It is a play on redundant, right?
 
But it’s completly ok to compare it to tax evasion and drunk driving...

The people who brought those things up used them as examples to illustrate that ignorance of the law does not excuse the crime, this principle goes back thousands of years and was present in Roman times and is also referenced in the Old Testament of the bible.
 
Said I would not comment on this mess but.............

Seems to me when I studied school law several years, the courts ruled that schools could dismiss or keep a student out of their school based on something that happened prior their enrollment. The ruling, if I recall correctly, is that schools have a duty to protect people to a certain extent. To give an extreme case, a senior in HS gets convicted of rape or assault on a female, could be denied, and at the college I attended, it did indeed happen.

That may be the case, but the code of conduct posted was written in such a way that this situation would not apply. It specifically said from enrollment on. We know for a fact that he wasn't even close to being enrolled at that time as he didn't have the grades & test scores necessary to be accepted.
 
For those on the side of no he shouldn't be kicked off the team and he should be given a stern lecture.

If this was your daughter would you feel the same? She was mostly over the issue and getting on with her life when she reached out to and tried to congratulate a friend for realizing his dreams when he responded with a video and calling her a ho. Having the opportunity to play on national TV, reminding your daughter with every article and highlight of his attempt to humiliate her, especially knowing the original incident put her into a spiral that led to her having substance abuse and mental health issues?

I sure as hell would go scorched earth on the guy and not rest until he faced the consequences of his actions.[/QUOTe
Yes, because the charges of an adult (not a kid) possessing child pornography and then using it to get back at someone who he likely knew would be humiliated by getting the video sent to her is the absolute equivalent of lifting a candy bar as a minor.

Dismissing him from the University of Nebraska if found guilty of this is obviously proportionate to sentencing to death as well.

I personally find the legal system incredibly ineffective, corrupt and overly punitive in the US. It is often twisted to perpetuate systemic racism and disproportionately impacts the poor and minorities. However, with that said I do think that there have to be consequences for breaches of the law, if Washington did what he was accused of, I don't think he belongs as a student athlete at Nebraska.

I'm not as up to date on things as you on what happened...but there are some things that give me pause to wait for all of the facts before I pass any judgment...such as

I find it curious that the there were no charges of rape if that is what clearly took place in the video.....I'm not aware of what was said in the texts between Mo and his ex girlfriend and what might have precipitated his response....you seem to know what her intention was, but I have never seen the actual texts to make any assumptions....if my ex girlfriend was having sex with some of my classmates, I'm not sure that the call was a congratulatory call between friends...but again I don't know the details. After talking with several friends of mine that are judges, I'm not sure that there will be an actual case of child pornography and maybe just a case of sending the video without consent...again the courts will decide as I don't assume to know how this will play out. The ONLY fact that I really know is that he sent an inappropriate video to his ex girlfriend that he didn't ( and should have... deleted )....while the demonstrates poor judgment I'm willing to wait for this all to play out before I go "scorched earth on him".
 
During his recruitment it’s was stated he lacked a father figure and discipline. My crystal balls says your screen name is perfect. It is a play on redundant, right?

His father died of cancer when he was 7 or 8, his dad had played for the Raiders.
 
It’s ironic to me that all the “pitchfork” posters quit posting around the end of day time periods for most employees. Almost like they are spending they’re work days blogging.
It's good that you see yourself standing for fairness, but you're REALLY invested in defending Mo when you admit you don't know all the facts. You make a lot of assumptions, I waste time on the internet on work time and personal time equally. It's ironic to me that you've been here all day and yet you seem to want to keep track of an evaluate what "time on site" means for everyone else? Do you have some special status that doesn't apply to the rest of us?
 
It's good that you see yourself standing for fairness, but you're REALLY invested in defending Mo when you admit you don't know all the facts. You make a lot of assumptions, I waste time on the internet on work time and personal time equally. It's ironic to me that you've been here all day and yet you seem to want to keep track of an evaluate what "time on site" means for everyone else? Do you have some special status that doesn't apply to the rest of us?

To be fair, everyone is making assumptions here. Only one side of the story has been told and some are going apeshit already.
 
Why is it always a male who presumes to decide how a woman, or in this case a young girl of 15, should respond when being raped? Allegedly 2 males, that were likely bigger and stronger than her, raped her. The fact that she didn't fight or struggle is not an indication that she wasn't raped. Everyone does not react the same in stressful situations, she may have froze and thought it best if she didn't struggle for her safety. Also, not reporting is very common, for fear of being branded and humiliated by jackasses like @JohnRossEwing. For you and everyone else who thinks it is okay to presume to know how she should feel and react, that is a garbage take and you people are trash.

Now for the original purpose of this thread, yes I think he should get his day in court. But I think he should be removed from the team for a couple of reasons. It's a black eye for the team, the Athletic Dept. and the University. Secondly, because Scott's own words about social media and recruiting higher character individuals, it's a bad look and sends the wrong message if he doesn't follow through. Thirdly, someone posted some rules from the student code of conduct, these indicated their hands may be tied. But they could just ignore these, problem is you could open the University up to litigation from any student who was expelled for violating these codes.

In the end it doesn't matter what you, I or anyone else thinks. This decision will be made by Scott, Moos and the University administration and will be their burden to carry.
But it is okay for you to presume how she should feel and how she possibly did or did not react. Got it! I can't stop reading this post there is so much in this post that is amazing.
 
During his recruitment it’s was stated he lacked a father figure and discipline. My crystal balls says your screen name is perfect. It is a play on redundant, right?
what is so difficult for people to let the legal system work and their personnel to earn their money? Why is mob rule so attractive? I am curious. Mob rule just seems like a waste of energy.
 
To be fair, everyone is making assumptions here. Only one side of the story has been told and some are going apeshit already.
I could be wrong but I've really only seen a few posters concluding he's a POS and should be kicked off the team and prosecuted. A few think he should be gone to save our program from bad PR. Seems the vast majority agree to either wait and see or think he should have reasonable punishment. Again, maybe I'm wrong.
 
Why is it always a male who presumes to decide how a woman, or in this case a young girl of 15, should respond when being raped? Allegedly 2 males, that were likely bigger and stronger than her, raped her. The fact that she didn't fight or struggle is not an indication that she wasn't raped. Everyone does not react the same in stressful situations, she may have froze and thought it best if she didn't struggle for her safety. Also, not reporting is very common, for fear of being branded and humiliated by jackasses like @JohnRossEwing. For you and everyone else who thinks it is okay to presume to know how she should feel and react, that is a garbage take and you people are trash.
Where did I say I know how she feels? I am simply stating it is possible she lied to her parents. Taking into consideration the facts that we know. IE No charges being filed a year after the cops saw the video. Her only claiming rape after her parents saw it. That could, maybe, possibly suggest it didn't happen like she claims.
I am not saying it didn't happen. I haven't seen the tape, I haven't talked to the cops. You are saying these men are guilty going off of only the words of a teenager. I am saying she could be lying based off of facts, and evidence. I am not calling her a liar. I am saying it is possible she is. Could it still come out she was assaulted , sure it could. Wait until that comes out before declaring guilt and those of us who are skeptical trash.
Again with the insults. Classy.
 
Where did I say I know how she feels? I am simply stating it is possible she lied to her parents. Taking into consideration the facts that we know. IE No charges being filed a year after the cops saw the video. Her only claiming rape after her parents saw it. That could, maybe, possibly suggest it didn't happen like she claims.
I am not saying it didn't happen. I haven't seen the tape, I haven't talked to the cops. You are saying these men are guilty going off of only the words of a teenager. I am saying she could be lying based off of facts, and evidence. I am not calling her a liar. I am saying it is possible she is. Could it still come out she was assaulted , sure it could. Wait until that comes out before declaring guilt and those of us who are skeptical trash.
Again with the insults. Classy.
Exactly!

You think she made it up! You are trash

By the way, I think the two guys are guilty of rape.

Okay.
 
The people who brought those things up used them as examples to illustrate that ignorance of the law does not excuse the crime, this principle goes back thousands of years and was present in Roman times and is also referenced in the Old Testament of the bible.
The United States is a religiously free country, there’s no room for “its b/c it’s his will” in this thread when you can’t make a rational argument or when you state your belief or opinion as fact.
 
Uh oh...don't tell that other poster on this site that things teens are the most moral and virtuous people in the world.

And it is a HUGE issue...not to the kids but to the adults that have to deal with it.
I never said "teens are the most moral and virtuous people in the world" if its me youre referring to. There you go with the hyperbole again.
You literally said in your first post that every teen has this on their phone or has done this. I disagreed with that assumption because its absolutely not true.
I never said that A) no one does this or B) that it isnt a problem.
You seem incabable of admitting that despite the fact that it does happen, there are absolutely many teens out there who do not engage in this stuff. I find your low, blanket opinion of teens not only wrong but a little degrading. Someone hurt you or something?
Even when given a source claiming 40%, your own twisted bias leads you to think its rational to just ignore that and say 'well heck Id say its 30% higher and expect you all to believe it or you dont live on earth, who cares what that study says, im right!'

Is this happening? Yes. Is it a problem? Yes. Is every kid who does this a bad kid? Of course not!
Are as many kids doing this as you, the almighty, say are? No.
Im guessing your response will contain more hyperbole, so dont bother.
Further, none of this makes what Mo did okay, and its really not even close to the same thing anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO and timnsun
I'm not as up to date on things as you on what happened...but there are some things that give me pause to wait for all of the facts before I pass any judgment...such as

I find it curious that the there were no charges of rape if that is what clearly took place in the video.....I'm not aware of what was said in the texts between Mo and his ex girlfriend and what might have precipitated his response....you seem to know what her intention was, but I have never seen the actual texts to make any assumptions....if my ex girlfriend was having sex with some of my classmates, I'm not sure that the call was a congratulatory call between friends...but again I don't know the details. After talking with several friends of mine that are judges, I'm not sure that there will be an actual case of child pornography and maybe just a case of sending the video without consent...again the courts will decide as I don't assume to know how this will play out. The ONLY fact that I really know is that he sent an inappropriate video to his ex girlfriend that he didn't ( and should have... deleted )....while the demonstrates poor judgment I'm willing to wait for this all to play out before I go "scorched earth on him".

I am reading what came out in the original article and his lawyer's statements, nobody knows what was in the video exactly outside of those who have seen it. Washington has already been charged with the crimes, a felony and a misdemeanor. We don't know for sure he sent the video, we know he's accused of sending the video and the text.

I am not going scorched earth on him, I was saying if it happened to my daughter I would do so.
 
what is so difficult for people to let the legal system work and their personnel to earn their money? Why is mob rule so attractive? I am curious. Mob rule just seems like a waste of energy.
How could you conclude from any of my posts that I’m behind the mob rule mentality. I think I’ve been completely transparent about letting the law and precedents set by the law in this case to be decided in the court room. Not an outcome fueled by the fear of media backlash or religious values.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
I never said "teens are the most moral and virtuous people in the world" if its me youre referring to. There you go with the hyperbole again.
You literally said in your first post that every teen has this on their phone or has done this. I disagreed with that assumption because its absolutely not true.
I never said that A) no one does this or B) that it isnt a problem.
You seem incabable of admitting that despite the fact that it does happen, there are absolutely many teens out there who do not engage in this stuff. I find your low, blanket opinion of teens not only wrong but a little degrading. Someone hurt you or something?
Even when given a source claiming 40%, your own twisted bias leads you to think its rational to just ignore that and say 'well heck Id say its 30% higher and expect you all to believe it or you dont live on earth, who cares what that study says, im right!'

Is this happening? Yes. Is it a problem? Yes. Is every kid who does this a bad kid? Of course not!
Are as many kids doing this as you, the almighty, say are? No.
Im guessing your response will contain more hyperbole, so dont bother.
Further, none of this makes what Mo did okay, and its really not even close to the same thing anyway.

Nope, not you!
 
Last edited:
I will say if this escalates like what happened to urb Nebraska and coach frost need to nip it asap and cut ties. Do damage control. I just can't figure out how bob stoops was able to survive the joe mixon deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
what is so difficult for people to let the legal system work and their personnel to earn their money? Why is mob rule so attractive? I am curious. Mob rule just seems like a waste of energy.
Well...sure but then why have message boards. I mean, it is to post stuff.
 
I will say if this escalates like what happened to urb Nebraska and coach frost need to nip it asap and cut ties. Do damage control. I just can't figure out how bob stoops was able to survive the joe mixon deal
Maybe cause the video came out way later? Wasn't that the case?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
I will say if this escalates like what happened to urb Nebraska and coach frost need to nip it asap and cut ties. Do damage control. I just can't figure out how bob stoops was able to survive the joe mixon deal

Ehh, I don't know if cutting ties is necessary. Especially if he only gets probation. That would be a little overboard. The press hasn't been that bad (regarding NU, not Mo) and I think most people will be able to differentiate between something like this and actual sexual assault/rape since Mo had nothing to do with that aspect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red-one21
The United States is a religiously free country, there’s no room for “its b/c it’s his will” in this thread when you can’t make a rational argument or when you state your belief or opinion as fact.

Huh? I am referencing thousands of years of legal practice that ignorance of law isn't considered a viable defense in criminal courts. I was using the Old Testament as a historical reference for dating purposes, not attempting to use religion as anything other than such.
 
I am reading what came out in the original article and his lawyer's statements, nobody knows what was in the video exactly outside of those who have seen it. Washington has already been charged with the crimes, a felony and a misdemeanor. We don't know for sure he sent the video, we know he's accused of sending the video and the text.

I am not going scorched earth on him, I was saying if it happened to my daughter I would do so.

How would you feel about your daughter and his response if the video actually proved that she consented....I’m not saying she did, but IF she did I can see where some may get claim what he said was true.
 
How could you conclude from any of my posts that I’m behind the mob rule mentality. I think I’ve been completely transparent about letting the law and precedents set by the law in this case to be decided in the court room. Not an outcome fueled by the fear of media backlash or religious values.
I didn't read all posts. I am just curious about the sociological phenomenon of people to be lead by a mob. Do you have any thoughts on the subject?

I don't know you in particular. I don't even remember the first post of yours that I commented about. So, no, I am not questioning your particular views on the rule of law. I don't know anything about your views or about how you think religious backgrounds influence (or not) mob rule. I have religious beliefs and believe in the rule or law and disdain mob rule. I try not to make any premature judgments, only that they be fair and unbiased.
thank you for your interest
 
i keep seeing a lot of the same arguments trying to say this isnt bad enough to kick him off the team, and some have to do with it being just some stupid teenage stuff. But this isnt a case where some girl willingly sent him a nude picture and he just happened to hold on to it past 18 making it "technically" child porn but not really the same as a child predator type thing. I would agree for the most part if that were the case, but it isnt.
This video was well known about at this school. Stuff went down with autorities. Theres no way the authorities didnt make it known that this video was child porn and illegal to have, not to mention she didnt want anyone to have it. He not only kept it, but kept it for a few years then sent it to her maliciously, knowing that it was a sex video involving a 15 year old. Now, I dont think he needs booted this instant as new information can come to light and he deserves due process, but if this is indeed true I dont know how you keep him.

And whether or not shes a horrible person really doesnt matter. Im sure the sex was consenual, but that doesnt matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Husker Todd
i keep seeing a lot of the same arguments trying to say this isnt bad enough to kick him off the team, and some have to do with it being just some stupid teenage stuff. But this isnt a case where some girl willingly sent him a nude picture and he just happened to hold on to it past 18 making it "technically" child porn but not really the same as a child predator type thing. I would agree for the most part if that were the case, but it isnt.
This video was well known about at this school. Stuff went down with autorities. Theres no way the authorities didnt make it known that this video was child porn and illegal to have, not to mention she didnt want anyone to have it. He not only kept it, but kept it for a few years then sent it to her maliciously, knowing that it was a sex video involving a 15 year old. Now, I dont think he needs booted this instant as new information can come to light and he deserves due process, but if this is indeed true I dont know how you keep him.

And whether or not shes a horrible person really doesnt matter. Im sure the sex was consenual, but that doesnt matter.
If it is all true, there is no way he is staying on the team. He will be gone for sure.

Also, by saying the sex was consensual you better be ready to be attacked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: husker2612
How would you feel about your daughter and his response if the video actually proved that she consented....I’m not saying she did, but IF she did I can see where some may get claim what he said was true.

Honestly, no different, my response to Washington would likely be different than the response to the individuals accused of the assault. My anger would be directed to why this person thought it was okay to send my daughter a copy of the video 2-3 years after it happened.
 
Honestly, no different, my response to Washington would likely be different than the response to the individuals accused of the assault. My anger would be directed to why this person thought it was okay to send my daughter a copy of the video 2-3 years after it happened.
You would have no anger towards your 15 year old daughter having a filmed 3some? Man, I would.
 
Hey, fun times, actual new facts in this.

Washington will voluntarily travel back to CA to deal with this rather than go through the warrant process, his lawyer is obviously negotiating to get the charges reduced or dismissed as he should as his lawyer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT