R RedSea Recruiting Coordinator Jun 18, 2001 6,616 1,474 113 Sep 9, 2017 #1 We had net of 109 yards rushing. 109 yards. That is Nebraska, vs. Oregon. Lee completion % was under 50%, and 4 interceptions. Not promising stats.
We had net of 109 yards rushing. 109 yards. That is Nebraska, vs. Oregon. Lee completion % was under 50%, and 4 interceptions. Not promising stats.
Husker Sledge Junior Nov 17, 2013 1,724 2,203 113 Sep 9, 2017 #2 In addition to those stats our D gave up 42 in the first 1/2 and we only lost by 7 on the road at Oregon. Hey if we clean things up we might have something this year! Lol. Glass 1/2 full mentality.
In addition to those stats our D gave up 42 in the first 1/2 and we only lost by 7 on the road at Oregon. Hey if we clean things up we might have something this year! Lol. Glass 1/2 full mentality.
barney44 Recruiting Coordinator Oct 3, 2005 6,785 5,786 113 Nebraska Sep 9, 2017 #3 Letting them rack up 42 points in the first half is probably going to put your offense in a position to force the ball all game long. No excuses but running the ball wasn't going to get Nebraska back in it and playing catch up wont put your offense in a favorable position either.
Letting them rack up 42 points in the first half is probably going to put your offense in a position to force the ball all game long. No excuses but running the ball wasn't going to get Nebraska back in it and playing catch up wont put your offense in a favorable position either.
R RedSea Recruiting Coordinator Jun 18, 2001 6,616 1,474 113 Sep 9, 2017 #4 well, maybe the hole did hold down the rushing numbers, probably to some extent. But even then 109 seems very weak to me
well, maybe the hole did hold down the rushing numbers, probably to some extent. But even then 109 seems very weak to me