another one bites the dust
some interesting data for the "insider trading/players have an advantage" crowd:
some interesting data for the "insider trading/players have an advantage" crowd:
He wasn't betting he was donatinganother one bites the dust
some interesting data for the "insider trading/players have an advantage" crowd:
contrary to popular belief, players simply don't have an edge when gambling on their own sportHe wasn't betting he was donating
while a member of the Pirates, he went 0-25 on games involving the Pirates.I have to assume he was betting 5 team parlays with that win rate.
"The players will have an edge" isn't the reason why players/coaches aren't allowed to bet on their sport.contrary to popular belief, players simply don't have an edge when gambling on their own sport
of course."The players will have an edge" isn't the reason why players/coaches aren't allowed to bet on their sport.
Nope! They don't.contrary to popular belief, players simply don't have an edge when gambling on their own sport
You should tell that to my bookie!!!4.3% is impossibly low for even odds bets. He was either betting +2500 odds on average (which would mostly nullify any advantage/disadvantage argument) or losing on-purpose so it gets publicized for the cause but I know there’s no room for that possibility to exist in your small mind. No one could hit a 4.3% win rate on even odds bets if they tried. It would be the same as hitting 95.7%. No one is that good or that bad through 231, -110 bets.
You get a ‘D’ for effort on trying to spin this irrelevant and incomplete “data” for your argument. Still rent-free though I see. 🤣
Just reverse your final thoughts and BAM 95.7% 😎You should tell that to my bookie!!!
Right!?!?!Just reverse your final thoughts and BAM 95.7% 😎
Exactly my thoughts4.3% is impossibly low for even odds bets. He was either betting +2500 odds on average (which would mostly nullify any advantage/disadvantage argument) or losing on-purpose so it gets publicized for the cause but I know there’s no room for that possibility to exist in your small mind. No one could hit a 4.3% win rate on even odds bets if they tried. It would be the same as hitting 95.7%. No one is that good or that bad through 231, -110 bets.
You get a ‘D’ for effort on trying to spin this irrelevant and incomplete “data” for your argument. Still rent-free though I see. 🤣
Hahaha!Exactly my thoughts
He’s doing this on purpose so he can forever guarantee himself no more pro baseball income to one day hit the big one
Fishing for dipshits is so, so easy.
Rent free, because I own it, yet I don’t even pay taxes! Marvelous!Exactly my thoughts
He’s doing this on purpose so he can forever guarantee himself no more pro baseball income to one day hit the big one
Fishing for dipshits is so, so easy.
The problem is there’s zero context. If he only took +3000 bets at a consistent amount, he would actually be profitable with a 4.3% win rate.Is he literally the worst gambler ever? Did bookies fight kver who took his bets I wonder? I guess that percenrage didn't hit me when I read it initially. That guy really sucked.
There is context, you just don’t get it because you obviously don’t bet on baseball.The problem is there’s zero context. If he only took +3000 bets at a consistent amount, he would actually be profitable with a 4.3% win rate.
Jesus Christ can you stop being disingenuous for one second? You really are that afraid of being proven wrong that you just have to flat out lie. So hilariously Pathetic.There is context, you just don’t get it because you obviously don’t bet on baseball.
231 30-1 bets on baseball? That’s a 10+ teamer every day for a about a season and two thirds.
The biggest individual underdogs on a given day are rarely even 3-1.
This guy sucks at gambling and is a complete moron.
Ah geezJesus Christ can you stop being disingenuous for one second? You really are that afraid of being proven wrong that you just have to flat out lie. So hilariously Pathetic.
You know damn well there’s 231+ different ‘MLB related’ 30-1 bets you can place every single week on different team and player props, selling points and ten different other things. It doesn’t even mention a timeline. You’re either being disingenuous or just an actual idiot. Idk which is worse for society.
Makes you a total moron either way, while also insulting everyone’s intelligence here along the way. Holy fackkk 🤣
I’ll consider that a concession to your dumbass argument.Ah geez
You’re broken
Anyone know a good asshole repairman?
This isn’t an argument.I’ll consider that a concession to your dumbass argument.
If someone actually went 4.3% betting an average of -110 bets, he’d instantly be the most followed gambler in the world.Honestly, if you TRIED to lose that many games, you would have a hard time doing it.
This dude either really sucks...or the info is bad. That is it.
Just to give you an idea...yesterday I went 0/4
The day before 6/6
I mean...I have done.If someone actually went 4.3% betting an average of -110 games, he’d instantly be the most followed gambler in the world.
That’s what I thought, loser. Keep spinning your CNN-style BS. I’ll be here to call you on it 😁This isn’t an argument.
Time to throw you back, little guppy.
Not with a 231 sample size thoughI mean...I have done.
It is the reason that I have a pool noodle floatie and not a boat.
Oh yeah, a bigger sample size even.Not with a 231 sample size though
no questionOh yeah, a bigger sample size even.
Dude, trust me, it can be done! I have had 0/25 11am wagers.
Ugggg, you ever start chasing live lines on CFB games at like 11:45am????no question
see: my March Madness picks
god yesUgggg, you ever start chasing live lines on CFB games at like 11:45am????
Thinking that you know more, that you are the smart guy? Then you look at your ****ing account and are like "How the **** did I go 0/13 on ****ing Miami of Ohio vs Akron"???
Hahaha!god yes
You’re also not allowed into his bank accounts, to see all of his private income streams, or see his personal contacts. All we know is he won 4.3% of 231 bets which means essentially, nothing. Just an attention whore headline, meant to mislead non-gamblers.here are 3 things we know for certain:
1. he was not betting exclusively -110 lines
2. he was not betting exclusively 30-1 parlays
3. he will not parlay this into bigger and better things in the world of sports, gambling or sports gambling