I've been looking through team statistical data over the last seven seasons to try and get a gauge on what we will actually see with this new regime that is different from the past staff. As with many comparisons like this where you may have preconceived notions, there were clearly some findings that surprised me. Obviously, the formations, packages and overall run/pass ratios will change but my interest was in distribution (i.e. who will be getting the ball relative to the overall touches/attempts).
Rushing from 2007 - 2014 at Oregon St / Nebraska (with a Watson/Beck breakdown):
A couple of the findings that seem to lead to obvious conclusions/projections:
Rushing from 2007 - 2014 at Oregon St / Nebraska (with a Watson/Beck breakdown):
- Percentage of rushing attempts by running backs - 75.5 / 70.8 (Watson 71.0/Beck 70.6)
- Percentage of rushing attempts by wide receivers - 11.7 / 1.2 (Watson 1.0/Beck 1.4)
- Percentage of rushing attempts by quarterbacks - 12.8 / 28.0 (Watson 28.0/Beck 28.0)
- Percentage of rushes credited as a sack - 7.5 / 4.1 (Watson 4.3/Beck 4.0)
- Percentage of receptions by wide receiver - 60.7 / 64.9 (Watson 59.0/Beck 69.8)
- Percentage of receptions by tight end - 16.8 / 17.0 (Watson 21.2/Beck 13.6)
- Percentage of receptions by running back - 22.5 / 18.1 (Watson 19.7/Beck 16.7)
- Percentage of pass attempts resulting in a sack - 6.1 / 6.6 (Watson 6.4/Beck 6.8)
A couple of the findings that seem to lead to obvious conclusions/projections:
- Wide receivers will clearly become more featured in the run game. Going from a ratio of approximately 1/100 to 1/10 is significant and it should be noticeable.
- I would expect the overall rushing attempts by QB's to see a bump from the historical OSU average. I doubt it will come close to the almost 3/10 ratio NU has experienced but a 2/10 ratio wouldn't surprise me at all.
- The percentage of receptions by RB's should see an immediate 4 to 5 point bump from what we've seen recently under Beck.
- You don't see it in the data that I provided but OSU clearly leaned on their top backs and receivers more heavily than what we've seen at NU. The number of players getting touches wasn't appreciably different but on average the distribution at OSU favored the "featured" back or receiver to a higher percentage.
- Receptions by the TE position were clearly in a nose dive under Beck but overall, the usage of the TE was a lot more comparable between the regimes that what I had anticipated. OSU passed quite a bit more so the TE individual stats are much more substantial but as a percentage of the overall receptions/touches, this position group was fairly comparable w/NU. Mind blown.