Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The other thing that pisses me off about the Big10 is how in the world is NW known as NU, we are NU and a much bigger player they are NW
Pelini has to be included also as a failure.You can't ignore the massive attrition of Riley's classes. Our Junior and Senior classes are REALLY weak. We are fortunate to get the grad transfers as those have filled some positions but we are pretty sketchy on the oline and at MLB...and we might have a tough time on d next year because we lose a lot of meat. It really sucks that Frost will be judged when he has had to build on such a shiite foundation.
You can't ignore the massive attrition of Riley's classes. Our Junior and Senior classes are REALLY weak. We are fortunate to get the grad transfers as those have filled some positions but we are pretty sketchy on the oline and at MLB...and we might have a tough time on d next year because we lose a lot of meat. It really sucks that Frost will be judged when he has had to build on such a shiite foundation.
I can't evaluate this beyond my annoyance at a tweet from "Husk Guys" referring to Northwestern as NU. Lame.
That would be a very interesting analysis FBS-wide, I would be curious about that result as well.Given the amount of turnover, how would the weighted 5 year average look, given the players on the team now?
Immediately coming to mind...Are there other universities out there who’s official name is The University of X but insist on being referred to as XU?
Immediately coming to mind...
University of Kansas
University of Colorado
I'd like to see our alternate helmets contain the word "University" one Day.Are there other universities out there who’s official name is The University of X but prefer to be referred to as XU?
This is the first thing that came to mind for me.I'd like to see our alternate helmets contain the word "University" one Day.
I think Nebraska should trademark the word "university "Immediately coming to mind...Are there other universities out there who’s official name is The University of X but insist on being referred to as XU?
University of Kansas
University of Colorado
It is that way only in the Big 10.The other thing that pisses me off about the Big10 is how in the world is NW known as NU, we are NU and a much bigger player they are NW
I think you're being a bit over dramatic about "next season."
They're going to have a Defensive line rotation this season where they feel comfortable playing 8 to 9 scholarship players. They will lose three of them for 2020 but come back with a ton of snaps. it will mimic a "plug and play" for the first time in years.
The secondary will bring back 3 starters and include a legit 3 deep of scholarship players.
Plus it will be year three of a system with likely the same coaches. That side of the football wasn't left with much, but there are plenty of reasons to be effusive about the future.
OLB and pass rusher will still be a concern though.
So you're saying we're done "putting stars on players"?Another thing is, as fans,we've been led to believe four stars are more of a crapshoot than they really are, as our previous staffs struggled to develope them, and most the team for that matter.
Too much focus on starters,not enough on the rest,and often top guys starting early in their career because of needs that were never corrected, where another year of good developement and possible redshirt would have really helped those players and the team.
It is a BIG 8 thing (or BIG 6)Are there other universities out there who’s official name is The University of X but prefer to be referred to as XU?
Our Junior and Senior classes SHOULD have 50 flippin players ready to suit up and dominate....guys with 3 to 4 years of development in a consistent system. Lets say there is 20% attrition...that means we should have 40 guys who are ready...we aren't anywhere near that...you can't even point out 20 guys from those two classes who we will rely on...that is pathetic. Having to get jucos, grad transfers, and rely on sophomores and freshman is a big deal and can't be overlooked. Pointing out the recruiting rankings of gutted and pathetic classes is pointless and only drives expectations beyond ridiculous. If we win this year it won't be because we are a particularly whole team, it will be because we are in a weak conference with teams in flux as well.
Our Junior and Senior classes SHOULD have 50 flippin players ready to suit up and dominate....guys with 3 to 4 years of development in a consistent system. Lets say there is 20% attrition...that means we should have 40 guys who are ready...we aren't anywhere near that...you can't even point out 20 guys from those two classes who we will rely on...that is pathetic. Having to get jucos, grad transfers, and rely on sophomores and freshman is a big deal and can't be overlooked. Pointing out the recruiting rankings of gutted and pathetic classes is pointless and only drives expectations beyond ridiculous. If we win this year it won't be because we are a particularly whole team, it will be because we are in a weak conference with teams in flux as well.
I think he is one of the Kartrashian kids?who is peter north?
Agreed, just not sure why some are playing chicken little because of attrition from guys mostly that are, to quote Chins, are turds, or were turds,since theyve been flushed.I understand the year one mulligan but elite coaching at elite/blue blood programs win early at elite levels usually year 2-3. Not some crazy 5 year plan.
This is Frost’s team and his record. We should win the west this year.
I can’t remember which coach was quoted as saying “there is a scoreboard in life. We shouldn’t run from it”
If we win this year, it may also be the result of having one of the best QB's in the country. The right QB can overcome a lot.
You left out Nebraska in your "win early and win often"...Tom Osborne took over for a National championship team and it took 22 years for him to win big. The NCAA climate is little different from the 80s or 90s...elite talent is still concentrated far away from us, we are still going to win with a gimmick college offense and an aggressive defense and S and C. We are still going to dominate the regions around us, and we are still going to feast on weaklings in our division year after year. That being said we aren't likely to make the playoff more than once a decade even when things are rolling and they certainly are not considered rolling at this point. These ignorant high expectations poison this board and the fan base. There is not another team that won a full national title within 800 miles of us in the modern era. That means it is really hard to win big anywhere other than California, Ohio and the southeast. Even Texas has a poor track record of championships. We can't expect more than a sniff at a title every 10 years, and we should expect to at least be in the running for the DEC championship every november.I understand the year one mulligan but elite coaching at elite/blue blood programs win early at elite levels usually year 2-3. Not some crazy 5 year plan.
This is Frost’s team and his record. We should win the west this year.
I can’t remember which coach was quoted as saying “there is a scoreboard in life. We shouldn’t run from it”
I do the same thing at times, but usually it's the games against decent teams we lost to that I watch (1992 UW, 1996 Texas, 1998 and 2000 Kansas State). You, sir, take this to a different level.Was rewatching the 2017 Northern Illinois game. Damn, that line was super terrible and Mikale was poor as well.
I'm a masochist I guess.
I am shocked that Nick "Swinging" Gates wasn't drafted. Shocked I say.I do the same thing at times, but usually it's the games against decent teams we lost to that I watch (1992 UW, 1996 Texas, 1998 and 2000 Kansas State). You, sir, take this to a different level.
You left out Nebraska in your "win early and win often"...Tom Osborne took over for a National championship team and it took 22 years for him to win big. The NCAA climate is little different from the 80s or 90s...elite talent is still concentrated far away from us, we are still going to win with a gimmick college offense and an aggressive defense and S and C. We are still going to dominate the regions around us, and we are still going to feast on weaklings in our division year after year. That being said we aren't likely to make the playoff more than once a decade even when things are rolling and they certainly are not considered rolling at this point. These ignorant high expectations poison this board and the fan base. There is not another team that won a full national title within 800 miles of us in the modern era. That means it is really hard to win big anywhere other than California, Ohio and the southeast. Even Texas has a poor track record of championships. We can't expect more than a sniff at a title every 10 years, and we should expect to at least be in the running for the DEC championship every november.
I think if we moved the uni east or west it might help us win a natty. Ok,that's sarcasm.
Notice how teams that climb the mountain often stay there,or close to it?
If we get there, those players dont just disappear the next year, and your staff usually has some guys in the wings.
The teams that have fallen off, just like us, it has happened due to coaching changes.
Prime example,usc, still recruits killer classes, but they havnt come close to putting a flag atop mount cfb.
Also, okies been there several times, oh, and its thousands of miles from the west coast, depending on how far back you go.