There wasn't anything conclusive either way, ending like that sucks.how the frick do you have conclusive evidence to overturn that call?!?!!? should be tied
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There wasn't anything conclusive either way, ending like that sucks.how the frick do you have conclusive evidence to overturn that call?!?!!? should be tied
Unless they have a better view, I don't see how you overturn that.
Well...., you don’t. I saw that it was out at worst, inconclusive at best. Douche gets the call.how the frick do you have conclusive evidence to overturn that call?!?!!? should be tied
I mean...do those refs know what conclusive means?Well...., you don’t. I saw that it was out at worst, inconclusive at best. Douche gets the call.
Seriously am I the only one?What makes it worse is their coach reminds me of this guy for some reason. Friggin Iceland. Coulda used Emilio on our side tonight.
I mean...do those refs know what conclusive means?
Would have been zero scandal calling it inconclusive.
I get sick and tired of the standards for replay being made up at the whims of the officials present. If the standard is that there must be indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the court(which is what it is supposed to be), there is absolutely no way any person can say it is indisputable that the ball was in. If the call on the court means nothing(which seems to be the way they treated it), then stop this nonsense about the call on the court meaning anything. Use a consistent standard for the calls. If the ball had been called in and we challenged it, they wouldn't have had enough evidence to overturn it in our favor. It should have been the same way for the ball being called out.I mean...do those refs know what conclusive means?
Would have been zero scandal calling it inconclusive.
I think it was 13-11 at that point and the overturn made it 14-10. I agree nonetheless, bad call.It should have been 13-13. Huge f*#k up call! Could have cost us NC! No way it should have been reversed
Agree, but slightly disagree. (I think there could have been evidence to overturn it to out, but i certainly wouldnt have been up in arms had they called it in and said indisputable.)I get sick and tired of the standards for replay being made up at the whims of the officials present. If the standard is that there must be indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the court(which is what it is supposed to be), there is absolutely no way any person can say it is indisputable that the ball was in. If the call on the court means nothing(which seems to be the way they treated it), then stop this nonsense about the call on the court meaning anything. Use a consistent standard for the calls. If the ball had been called in and we challenged it, they wouldn't have had enough evidence to overturn it in our favor. It should have been the same way for the ball being called out.
But we won the next two points, so it would have been 13-13.I think it was 13-11 at that point and the overturn made it 14-10.
I don’t have faith in much of the refs/officials in most sports.I mean...do those refs know what conclusive means?
Would have been zero scandal calling it inconclusive.
Yes, then we went on 2 0 run. Very well could have still lost. Who knows? But thats the point....who knows?I think it was 13-11 at that point and the overturn made it 14-10.
But we won the next two points, so it would have been 13-13.
Then we scored twice. May very well have cost us the repeat.I think it was 13-11 at that point and the overturn made it 14-10. I agree nonetheless, bad call.
Exactly...we have no way of knowing. But had the correct call been made, we WOULD know.We all know that those points might not have played out that way if it was overturned...there is no way to know what would have happened. I believe the overturn was wrong.
I actually agree, I think geometry plays a part in many sports replays. There seems to be a lack of commen sense in directionality and changes In movements in all sports.Agree, but slightly disagree. (I think there could have been evidence to overturn it to out, but i certainly wouldnt have been up in arms had they called it in and said indisputable.)
They also need to go back and learn about shapes. The center of the ball was clearly out, and thats the first point of contact for a sphere, and at first contact the ball is dead.
Not only was the ball out, clearly, but as said, was not disputable.
Every time I see him I see a douche, not much else. I do see the mighty ducks reference though.What makes it worse is their coach reminds me of this guy for some reason. Friggin Iceland. Coulda used Emilio on our side tonight.
The call was awful and clearly the ball was out, but if that's close Sun has to go get that. What cost this team the title were the 2 service errors in game 5. You can't spot Stanford 2 points in a 15 point game.Then we scored twice. May very well have cost us the repeat.
Hopefully Cook and instill some aggression in Schwarzenbach. She really needs to up her game. How many times did opposing setters, instead of setting to their team, just tip the ball right over her head. She stood there looking at it like she didn't have a clue. Most Frustrating!We are going to miss the heck out of Foecke and Maloney. They carried us tonight. Stivrens and Sweet were awesome. Hamlin and Sun have some growing up to do.
It sucks that we lost, and I thought that last call was bad, but seriously who gives a shit about the board drawing. It’s just some college students having fun. Leave it to twitter warriors to overreact.
I guess the phrase, “act like you’ve been there” comes to mind... and they’ve been there. So act like it.It sucks that we lost, and I thought that last call was bad, but seriously who gives a shit about the board drawing. It’s just some college students having fun. Leave it to twitter warriors to overreact.
They have demonized themselves with that whiteboard crap. No one had anything bad to say in this thread (except some trash talk about their coach) until the whiteboard. Even then, no one is really picking up much on the whiteboard either.No need to always demonize the opponents... if they were wearing red, we would love them...
Being a bit preemptive then? Cuz so far it’s otetty tame... I get that.Well ,with reason...... I just think we ( myself included) tend to find reasons to make something bigger than it is
I totally agree... but this goes back to you can only control who YOU are, not othersmy first reaction was..why are they blow-drying Herbie Husker? My second reaction was...you can take the girl out of the trailer park and put her at Stanford....but you can't take the trailer park out of the girl.
Just happy that I can confidently say...this white board would not have happened in the Nebraska locker room.