Unless Tommy was so banged up he couldn't run I cat understand why we didn't put him in a run pass option in overtime let him roll out.
Probably due to his decision making.
Unless Tommy was so banged up he couldn't run I cat understand why we didn't put him in a run pass option in overtime let him roll out.
We only had to get in field goal range at the end of regulation. I felt like we could have thrown 5-10 yard passes to Morgan all the way down the field. Instead we went for the Hail Mary?
Agreed.OT playcalling on first and 2nd down was horrendous. 2 runs up the middle by the tailback that basically didn't work all night? Put Tommy in the shotgun and give him a zone read playcall if you are going to run it. At least he or the running back could have gained 6 yards or so and made 3rd/4th down easier to convert. Langsdorf basically gave away the first two plays in over time!!!
I am talking about the ultra conservative running plays that were called on 1st and 2nd down in overtime...not the passing game. We had a chance to win the game and we call 2 runs right up the middle and do not give a pretty good running qb the option to possibly use his legs...unreal.
I really feel bad for the players given those play calls.
Were you coherent when you posted this? Langsdorf called a bad game plain and simple.Langs has to run an offense with TA as his best option at QB
we are 7-1 and went toe to toe with Wisconsin ... the guy deserves a big fat raise
so does Banker
That was really odd. I hope Riley once again takes play calling duties away from Langsdorf. I feel we would have won if Riley called the plays. Langsdorf has no clue what real play calling is. There's no rhyme or reason to his calls. I don't see calls setting up other calls later on down the line.I find it strange that HCMR says at halftime he wants to get outside in the running game and more boots yet Langsdorf calls none in the 2nd half.. Who's running the show..
It took the staff all the way to the Bowl game to figure this out last year. Langsdorf insisted on throwing the ball yesterday with a guy that isn't good at throwing it. Why we didn't run more zone read is baffling.Our odds were better giving Tommy the option of handing off or running based off the play of the defensive end than just running up the middle with the tailback. It isn't that hard to figure out given his strength as a quarterback is running.
Oh good gravy. It really is true. Even after running the ball the majority of plays, people still think the team "insisted" on throwing it.It took the staff all the way to the Bowl game to figure this out last year. Langsdorf insisted on throwing the ball yesterday with a guy that isn't good at throwing it. Why we didn't run more zone read is baffling.
We had a great opportunity to win the game in OT after Wisconsin missed the PAT. It would have erased all the bad calls that were made in regulation. Then in OT Langsdorf came up empty. We didn't run well between the tackles all day unless it was zone read. How he did not call something to get Armstrong outside is pure negligence!
That one with Westerkamp would have gone a long way if we had someone else in there with some speed. Moore or DPE would have picked up mega yards because it was well blocked downfield.The last 2 I saw were for negative yards. One was a reverse to Westerkamp. The other I don't remember who got the ball. Their backers did a great job of filling because our O line couldn't get to the 2nd level to stop pursuit. Wisconsin's DEs were very good.
If this is the case then why do we throw the ball when we were doing all right in running it? Langsdorf killed 3 drives by calling passes when we were moving it on the ground. Just 3 points from those 3 drives could very well have won us the game.You numnuts riding Langsdorf all year need to wake the hell up and figure out Nebraska doesn't have a quarterback. When your qbs mechanics are so pitiful he falls down trying to throw the ball it kind of handcuffs you in what your trying to do.
I don't think he audibles very much at all.I told you that I was screaming for an option. I also told you that we don't know what the play call in the huddle was for sure. We don't know if there was an audible or the option for an audible or what. DL has to BEFORE the defense sets, try to figure out what their tendencies are and what they are likely to do in that situation. SO you call the play you THINK will work against what you THINK they will show you. The QB HAS to get you in to the right play or if he can't he needs to call time out. Obviously either TA audibled to those plays OR thought the original play call was right for what he saw from the defense at the LOS....of course that's assuming that TA read the defense and didn't just go up there and say hike. Blindly saying we're gonna run X play because the other sh## didn't work is kind of silly.
Rules?Oh good gravy. It really is true. Even after running the ball the majority of plays, people still think the team "insisted" on throwing it.
I am convinced now more than ever that a good chunk of our fans do not understand the rules of modern football.
Well, your mom just left my house. She's bringing you a mcmuffin.Rules?
Where's all your buddies that come to pile on? I guess their mothers haven't awakened them yet!
Yes. Rules slanted and allowing easier movement of the ball via the forward pass. Trust me, I know you have absolutely no clue in this department.Rules?
Where's all your buddies that come to pile on? I guess their mothers haven't awakened them yet!
You're certainly an idiot and a fool. My mother is dead but nice try though! Since you like old women, try out your bud's moms!Well, your mom just left my house. She's bringing you a mcmuffin.
Nice knowing ya.You're certainly an idiot and a fool. My mother is dead but nice try though! Since you like old women, try out your bud's moms!