Whats amazing is all the talk about how OSU and Iowa need to get their passing games going - while so many on here have been pointing to them as examples of why we should give up the pass.
The difference is Iowa and OSU have had generally more pro-style attacks for many years. While the run game is central at Iowa, they haven't exactly been running an option style attack with 80/20 run pass ratios with guys like Tate, Stanzi, Beathard, etc. Their most mobile QB was probably Banks, and even his game was pass first, run when needed.
Their fan bases generally sound like NFL fan bases, which generally desire to balance out ability to run and throw depending on what looks are being taken away. This is not the case with our fan base, as "predicated on the run" seems to necessariliy imply that the QB must be mobile, or we must run a billion percent of the time.
Ok. So according to CFB stats, we rushed for basically 30 less YPG than Wisconsin and an average of 7 less rushing attempts per game. We are 10 YPG behind Iowa, but more or less, two carries a game more on average.
In terms of YPC, we had 4.2 to Wisconsin's 4.32
For Run the Damn Ball Guy, we are not entirely on a different planet than the bell cow program in our division for running the football. In fact, given the fact that we had a craptastic offensive line and they had a frosh QB they were protecting with a run game moreso than a Russell Wilson, those results are a little surprising.