74 receptionsWe got a good one.
Is he better than the two 5 star players in Missouri this year?
This is a legit question.Is he better than the two 5 star players in Missouri this year?
With analysis like this idk why we'd go anywhere else.You could always watch film of all of them and decide for yourself, but it appears that MaxPreps thinks he’s better as they have tabbed him the Player of the Year in Missouri.
Edit: Unless I have misunderstood and Player of the Year means something else.
Yea, Satt has never watched a single game or even film so he needs to know that stuff.He is a tweener, but as I said earlier this year Nebraska needs to capitalize on these type of players for our offense. Fidone and Smith are great receiving tight ends. Nelson will be a threat as well, and I'd guess has more room for weight gain.
Satt needs to watch some Chiefs film and watch how Andy utilizes Kelce. Split him out a few yards from the OT, sometimes in the backfield, use them in motion.
We could watch film, but like 99% of us here, we really have no idea what we're looking at to determine which WR is actually best.You could always watch film of all of them and decide for yourself, but it appears that MaxPreps thinks he’s better as they have tabbed him the Player of the Year in Missouri.
Edit: Unless I have misunderstood and Player of the Year means something else.
The real test is what they look like against other P5 scholarship guys.We could watch film, but like 99% of us here, we really have no idea what we're looking at to determine which WR is actually best.
Pregnancy cadence?Yea, Satt has never watched a single game or even film so he needs to know that stuff.
We need receivers, wide and tight, who can read a D and decide if they are in man or zone, where is the safety help, where did the backer blitz come from, if I see this D what route options do I have and what did the QB call for protection and routed in his pregnancy cadence?
Is he better than the two 5 star players in Missouri this year?
Sadly the statement holds true for a majority of coaches too. Lots of people think that a “title” must mean someone is an expert. Sometimes they are and sometimes they were give. Such title based on who they know more than what they know.We could watch film, but like 99% of us here, we really have no idea what we're looking at to determine which WR is actually best.
Mr. Smith is my favorite recruit in this class. He will find the field next year! STEAL of this years class!!!
We got a good one.
I forgot to mention 17 TDs.74 receptions
1268 receiving yards
It's really not that hard to see. Most of the time, it doesn't take more than 30 seconds to figure out the caliber of player someone is. I didn't watch this guy but I did watch our 5.5 3 star receiver, and yes, he was appropriately rated.We could watch film, but like 99% of us here, we really have no idea what we're looking at to determine which WR is actually best.
Clark camped and they gave him an offer. I already pointed out Lloyd had such crappy offers he was just going to run track before Rhule came.It's really not that hard to see. Most of the time, it doesn't take more than 30 seconds to figure out the caliber of player someone is. I didn't watch this guy but I did watch our 5.5 3 star receiver, and yes, he was appropriately rated.
Stop twisting the argument. I'll be the first to say you take a flyer on track speed even if the film doesn't look impressive. I'll come out and say it, Clark sucks and will never see the field. He's appropriately rated and I have no idea why we offered him. Lloyd on the other hand deserved a scholarship offer.Clark camped and they gave him an offer. I already pointed out Lloyd had such crappy offers he was just going to run track before Rhule came.
They whiffed on Sims but they had a tremendous first year of evaluating and developing freshman.
But here comes your excuse that Lloyd ran track, while you overlook the fact that recruiting services and other coaches knew that before hand.
that's a lot of both.74 receptions
1268 receiving yards
Clark supposedly ran a 4.42 at camp. He’s long and athletic. I’ll trust Rhule’s opinion over yours. I played against multiple guys in high school who didn’t wow me that went on to start multiple years for Tom at NU. It’s not about what they are as a high schooler. It’s about what they can become.Stop twisting the argument. I'll be the first to say you take a flyer on track speed even if the film doesn't look impressive. I'll come out and say it, Clark sucks and will never see the field. He's appropriately rated and I have no idea why we offered him. Lloyd on the other hand deserved a scholarship offer.
To be fair, you are terrible at evaluating talent and on top of that you bitch and moan about every recruit.Stop twisting the argument. I'll be the first to say you take a flyer on track speed even if the film doesn't look impressive. I'll come out and say it, Clark sucks and will never see the field. He's appropriately rated and I have no idea why we offered him. Lloyd on the other hand deserved a scholarship offer.
30 seconds? Lofl, that confirms it, you're a clown.It's really not that hard to see. Most of the time, it doesn't take more than 30 seconds to figure out the caliber of player someone is. I didn't watch this guy but I did watch our 5.5 3 star receiver, and yes, he was appropriately rated.
It was confirmed a long time ago.30 seconds? Lofl, that confirms it, you're a clown.
More documentation30 seconds? Lofl, that confirms it, you're a clown.
He literally bitched in one thread about mid 3 star recruits then in another said he isn't satisfied landing the top QB in the nation. He is someone to not take seriously. His post are comical at best at this point.To be fair, you are terrible at evaluating talent and on top of that you bitch and moan about every recruit.
If Clark runs a legit 4.42 that I've seen on here with that frame..... To much potential to pass up being a legacyClark is 6'5". can't coach that.
back to Smith - here's hoping his impact rivals that of another legendary Husker's son: Shavon Shields
I've seen that number from one poster who is widely known for fabricating such things.If Clark runs a legit 4.42 that I've seen on here with that frame..... To much potential to pass up being a legacy
Been around a long time and that’s a new name to me…Clark is 6'5". can't coach that.
back to Smith - here's hoping his impact rivals that of another legendary Husker's son: Shavon Shields
I’ll have to go back and listen to all of the coverage this morning. I thought Rhule said it but it might have been someone else.I've seen that number from one poster who is widely known for fabricating such things.
that said, I don't care what he runs today. it's what he runs when he's ready that matters.
Will’s kid was a very good small forward for us.Been around a long time and that’s a new name to me…
I can’t rewatch Rhule’s presser right now. I may be mistaken on who he was talking about running the 4.42 at camp.Great frame.
Anyone who thinks he really runs 4.42…I’m not sure what to say.