Frost is a proven winner...
LOL. Dude has coached 18 games to date.
Frost is a proven winner...
But Riley was your obsession after numerous years of being a proven loser....LOL. Dude has coached 18 games to date.
But Riley was your obsession after numerous years of being a proven loser....
No, you only quoted half of my post, dipshit, and I'm changing the subject???And....you've changed the subject that you brought up. It's hard having a conversation with someone who's stupid.
No, you only quoted half of my post, dipshit, and I'm changing the subject???
What's wrong with your brain?
Again, I find it ironic and hypocritical you jumped all aboard the riley train (and scored everybody) even though he wasn't a proven winner yet claim frost should be a backup because he's not a proven winner (which is bs).
Your butthurt is clouding your mind.
So you admit to changing the conversation...the entire point of my post was to show how you are hypocritical....when you only take half of it, it changes the intent and meaning of the post.This is awesome! Keep going.
You made a comment. I responded to a portion of it without any ambiguity, you ignored my response on your comment, and instead want to focus on something I didn't comment on. Now you're back to your original claim that I tried to comment on and won't explain.
Eeeekkk. Such fun.
So you admit to changing the conversation...the entire point of my post was to show how you are hypocritical....when you only take half of it, it changes the intent and meaning of the post.
You need to go with the scarecrow and find a brain.
Don't accuse me of changing the subject (as you did previously) when you admit to doing it.LOL. Homie, you need to get yourself into some reading comprehension classes. I admit to responding to half of your post. I challenged your assertion on Frost being a proven winner. He's not. He could be the next great CFB coach but he's certainly not a winner right now.
As usual, you're not capable of a nuanced discussion.....because you're not smart.
Don't accuse me of changing the subject (as you did previously) when you admit to doing it.
Frost is a proven winner everywhere he goes, and he's a top power five candidate for a reason. I don't know if we will hire him or not, but he should be a candidate, regardless of where he played. There are more proven coaches e I will admit. But I'd also say he's a better candidate than Riley ever was.
There I answered.
Now for you: why did you not care that Riley wasn't a proven winner, but now you do?
Do you think Riley has had enough time?HAHA. This is delicious. I didn't change the subject. I commented on your post. I also didn't accuse you of changing the subject; you just decided to punt on your Frost comment for the last few posts.
At long last, some comments from you on the actually subject you brought up. Calling him a proven winner and then citing his time as a player or assistant coach is weak sauce. To date, he is one of the top up-and-coming coaches in the country. Nobody disagrees with that. And of course he should be considered. Nobody is suggesting otherwise. A nuanced discussion about hiring a proven winner vs. Scott Frost, however, is not only appropriate, but it's completely nuts to suggest otherwise.
To your question: we have ALREADY HIRED RILEY when people lost their shit on his record. He was our head coach. I support the HC at Nebraska until they need to have their plug pulled. I supported him and advocated for him to get time because he deserved it. He was a the guy. Period. Just like Pelini was the guy. And Frank before him. I'll be supporting the next coach 100 % and hope they get the time they need too.
And the fact that you didn't comment on the substance and point of my post, proves that you changed the subject that I had brought up. I don't know why that's so hard to understand, but whatever this is childish I'll admit and move on.HAHA. This is delicious. I didn't change the subject. I commented on your post. I also didn't accuse you of changing the subject; you just decided to punt on your Frost comment for the last few posts.
At long last, some comments from you on the actually subject you brought up. Calling him a proven winner and then citing his time as a player or assistant coach is weak sauce. To date, he is one of the top up-and-coming coaches in the country. Nobody disagrees with that. And of course he should be considered. Nobody is suggesting otherwise. A nuanced discussion about hiring a proven winner vs. Scott Frost, however, is not only appropriate, but it's completely nuts to suggest otherwise.
To your question: we have ALREADY HIRED RILEY when people lost their shit on his record. He was our head coach. I support the HC at Nebraska until they need to have their plug pulled. I supported him and advocated for him to get time because he deserved it. He was a the guy. Period. Just like Pelini was the guy. And Frank before him. I'll be supporting the next coach 100 % and hope they get the time they need too.
Do you think Riley has had enough time?
And the fact that you didn't comment on the substance and point of my post, proves that you changed the subject that I had brought up. I don't know why that's so hard to understand, but whatever this is childish I'll admit and move on.
Who are your top three candidates that you want to be interviewed? Realistic ones other than Saban etc of course.
You not saying that as an original response to my post and instead commenting on only half of it...wait...nevermind it's hopeless.No, it doesn't. I didn't give it the time of day because you're comparing apples to oranges, i.e., bagging on a guy AFTER after he was hired to lead our program (...before he could show what he was capable of) vs. discussions on candidates before our current HC has even been shown the door.
You've and a couple others have been stalking my posting since the Riley era began. I told you and a few others to STFU a few times as you bagged our HC and his staff before he had a chance to show what he could do. I'll do the same to you or others if it happens with the next leader of our program.
I will coach the Huskers for $1000 per game to cover expenses.
and:
1. 50 grand for a win over a teir 3 school (top 100)
2. 75 grand for a win over a teir 2 school (top 50)
3. 100 grand for a win over a teir 1 school (top 20)
unlimited hunting on unl property
a red marauder truck and unlimited fuel
and assistant coaches of past NU , airforce, or monster girls teams.
and 20 grand for every 500 yard rushing game.
any buy out would be 100 grand, and free from any state, or douglas county tax for life.
best player plays. I would of had ohzigbo starting against osu, even if he got 1.5 yards, it was better then just getting to the line of scrimmage.How do you relate to 17 year old boys?
best player plays
we have some monster girl coaches, I covered thatBut how are you at courting and wooing 17 year old boys?
Because next year's schedule is brutal and the next coach will likely change schemes. It's not that difficult.Because he played here or in General? Do just the guys that played here get time? This is a legit question. If that is the case, that's fine. We can't keep running off guys when their recruits from a short cycle are only Red shirt Sophomores.
So how many years? The current guy was hated in his 1st year while changing schemes. Like I said, if it's because he is from Nebraska just admit it. I'm cool with that. But the schedule is an excuse. We are Nebraska, and fear nobody. Especially with a former Husker at the helm.Because next year's schedule is brutal and the next coach will likely change schemes. It's not that difficult.
If you want it to be about "former Husker", so be it. But it's not. You won't accept that. Not my problem.So how many years? The current guy was hated in his 1st year while changing schemes. Like I said, if it's because he is from Nebraska just admit it. I'm cool with that. But the schedule is an excuse. We are Nebraska, and fear nobody. Especially with a former Husker at the helm.
we have some monster girl coaches, I covered that
Frost will be given more time than just about anybody else. Not sure what you mean by "rough," but there are examples of new coaches having an immediate impact, like Pelini, and FrostI won't be upset if we hire Frost. He's most certainly one of the top up-and-coming coaches in the country. Great pedigree. I hope our fan base gives him the time he deserves. The first few years would be rough.
Frost will be given more time than just about anybody else. Not sure what you mean by "rough," but there are examples of new coaches having an immediate impact, like Pelini, and Frost
I agree.
Rough. Our schedule next year is brutal. We have too much dead weight on our roster. Still some position gaps in our roster. The next coach will be in stalling new schemes which our roster may not fit. Etc.
And please don't just focus on one year at UCF. Try going back five.
I totally agree. We should have at least 5 good candidates line up by the end of the year. I hate to think about the Callahan hire, where he was the best candidate left. I think Stoops is done with coaching football anywhere, why do you think he step down from OU?Frost should be a candidate but not the only one.
Hopefully we have a thorough search and interview process.
Id rather have Frost. Chip kelly doesn't like to recruit.If we’re willing to pay whatever it takes for Frost why not just throw a bunch of money at Chip?
Where do people come up with this s**t like they know Chip's personal recruiting habits? It's laughable how knowledgeable message board guy thinks he is.Id rather have Frost. Chip kelly doesn't like to recruit.
Frost will come if the AD wants him here
Not saying 1 year is enough of a sample size, but he has apparently made a drastic improvement in a very short period of time, as have other coaches in the past. I don't buy the argument that we need to be ready and prepared to suffer through several years of blah football when change is made. I am not saying that is your position, just one that I think gets used way too often. You get in the right coach, and NU can, at the very least, be noticeably better within a short period of time. Getting his guys in will be necessary for championship football, but we can be respectable until that time
Frost is probably the most proven of anyone we're likely to get.I'm 100 % serious. We should spend an absurd amount of money on a proven winner. Frost should be a back-up plan.
Quite simply, it is for you. You offer no other explanation why he would get more time than an outsider.If you want it to be about "former Husker", so be it. But it's not. You won't accept that. Not my problem.
We ran Solich out, a former Husker and TO disciple after one bad year. Why would Frost be any different?Here's my question on Frost. How much time does the NU fan base give him? Also, what if after year 3-4 we are no better off? Will NU fans loyalty to the former QB run so deep they let him hang around even if he's underperforming? Think Darin Erstad Syndrome...
We should just hire Frost and get this over with. If we don't hire him half the fan base is going to lose their shit every time there is bad play on the field; they simply won't get behind a non-Frost hire.
If Frost has success everyone is happy. If he fails we can finally move on from this "Nebraska guy" bullshit.
Yeah, then we can go get the next Clownahan or MR. WooHOO!!
It's the complete regression in year 3 that's the problem. He didn't earn any favors his first 2 years either having a losing season his first year and finishing poorly the 2nd.He does not get more than anyone else. Just because he played here does not mean we don't know exactly what he can do after 2 years