do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
Depends upon one's agenda.do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
But they should have won 5 including the game they gifted to us.They only won 4 fing games last year
do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
When we have the right guys the complaining about not having the right guys will stop.do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
When we have the right guys the complaining about not having the right guys will stop.
I know.I think he's saying we are chasing a rabbit. The coaches aren't up to par.
I know.
That was my way of responding dumb to what I perceived as a dumb question.
It would be one thing if this were a defense not going through a transition. But to complain this early is folly.
Really that's the new company line? Pathetic coaching we are a messWhen we have the right guys the complaining about not having the right guys will stop.
How many years do we need? The only folly was Riley bringing Banker with him in the first place. That's on Riley.I know.
That was my way of responding dumb to what I perceived as a dumb question.
It would be one thing if this were a defense not going through a transition. But to complain this early is folly.
Does it matter? Mike Riley will still be the HC regardless.do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
And my point is it's folly to keep making changes. Maybe not directed to you I guess, but those upset with the change will need to ride it out.That's the point. First the O transition excuse and now it's the D turn. Next year our ST will need an overhaul. Dummy![]()
Drunk post?
I am slightly buzzed. But I can still tell the difference between "who is" and "whose."How so? Who's agenda?
How am I making excuses?How many years do we need? The only folly was Riley bringing Banker with him in the first place. That's on Riley.
Now the team is paying for it. And you're making excuses.
I am slightly buzzed. But I can still tell the difference between "who is" and "whose."
Good luck.
What do you want me to say? He asked a question, what do you want me to say? I don't have a clue how many years til we get the right players in place.Really that's the new company line? Pathetic coaching we are a mess
You're making excuses for Diaco. Which is to say, making excuses that in year 3 of Riley's tenure, we're already back in year 1 of our defense.How am I making excuses?
Drunk post?
Sorry not picking on you but it is very clear we are not well coached. A well coached team may lose due to lack of talent but not get totally abused by a team that had a losing season last year. I am a NU fan and will continue to be a fan however I also know what I see and it is not talent giving up 42 points in the first half. I think the we need the right players thing is simply an excuse. Yes we need the right players we also need the right coaching. I for one will not throw these players under the bus this year, instead I choose to believe coaching is the more prominent problemWhat do you want me to say? He asked a question, what do you want me to say? I don't have a clue how many years til we get the right players in place.
Sorry I didn't answer the way you would have liked.
Ok.You're making excuses for Diaco. Which is to say, making excuses that in year 3 of Riley's tenure, we're already back in year 1 of our defense.
At least seven.do we hear the excuse about not having the right guys to run the defense??
Indeed. But that first drive was something...I'm not, but it might be the only way to watch the 2nd half.![]()