Riiiiiiight. So what do you suggest as an alternative? Fact checkers that deliver the answers you'd prefer to hear because they're more in line with your views? Or perhaps you'd prefer to rely on greasy turds like HBK who can't put together a coherent thought without hurling invective? You do understand that insults are not a basis for determining the veracity of a claim. Fact checkers use impartial criteria, and not all work for WaPo. So what about politifact, for example. They still show Trump lies at a rate heretofore unseen in American society. If that still isn't good enough, then what is the right offering as a platform for impartial criteria? Something that at least attempts to provide objective criteria for discerning fact, opinion and lie? The answer is nothing. Resistance? It's a farce when the party in the WH, with a majority of Senators, and majority of state houses claims to be the resistance.