ADVERTISEMENT

Gary Anderson, former Wisconsin coach

Chief Wiggum

Sophomore
Sep 29, 2001
1,389
2,853
113
He is the guy who coached at Wisky for two years I think, then abruptly went to Oregon State after Riley. I see the Beavs just got crushed by CU 47-6. They have been miserable since he got there with no hope in sight. Wisky fans barely remember his name nowadays, anyone know the real reasons he left Wisky? There has to be a good story in there somewhere, going from Wisky to Oregon State isnt even a lateral move.
 
From what I have heard...he hated Barry and dislike Madison.

I think, just a guess, that he wishes he never left Utah State.
 
He is the guy who coached at Wisky for two years I think, then abruptly went to Oregon State after Riley. I see the Beavs just got crushed by CU 47-6. They have been miserable since he got there with no hope in sight. Wisky fans barely remember his name nowadays, anyone know the real reasons he left Wisky? There has to be a good story in there somewhere, going from Wisky to Oregon State isnt even a lateral move.
IIRC, he didn't get along with Alvarez. I would think that maybe Barry may be a bit if a micromanager.
 
Wait a minute. Anderson won 73% of his games at Wisky, but he's 3-12 at Oregon State. How is that possible?

My understanding from numerous people on this board is coaches keep their same winning percentage when they change schools.
Classic!!!

But I'm betting its only true if you go from a bad school to a good school, not vice versa. Has to be that.
 
He is the guy who coached at Wisky for two years I think, then abruptly went to Oregon State after Riley. I see the Beavs just got crushed by CU 47-6. They have been miserable since he got there with no hope in sight. Wisky fans barely remember his name nowadays, anyone know the real reasons he left Wisky? There has to be a good story in there somewhere, going from Wisky to Oregon State isnt even a lateral move.
Look no farther than Bert Bielema and his issues with Wisconsin for your answer. Barry Alvarez. They have a very limited coaching and recruiting budget plus like others have said too many players don't qualify to get in because of higher academic standards. Bert couldn't keep his good Asst coaches and coordinators because Barry limited what he could pay them. Also I can remember looking at a Recruiting Budgets article about the B1G from a couple years ago and Wisconsin had a total Recruiting Budget for football that was under $280,000. Husker recruiting budget was around $1,000,000. Thats a big difference. Can't keep up with the Joneses on paying coach and recruiting expenditures. Also heard barry is the dreaded MM, Micro-Manager. Anderson is from the West Coast and felt like a Fish out of Water in Madison.
 
I'm not saying anything bad about Madison or Alvarez, but it's safe to say that Coach Anderson disliked his employer bad enough to take a job at Oregon State.


I thought he was a devout Mormon as well and didn't fit it too well in Madison. Seemed like a wrong fit at the time....entirely different Offense than what he was going to be able to recruit to there.
 
Maybe Anderson had the same mistress as Barry too.
 
He is the guy who coached at Wisky for two years I think, then abruptly went to Oregon State after Riley. I see the Beavs just got crushed by CU 47-6. They have been miserable since he got there with no hope in sight. Wisky fans barely remember his name nowadays, anyone know the real reasons he left Wisky? There has to be a good story in there somewhere, going from Wisky to Oregon State isnt even a lateral move.

I don't think it ever sat well with him that Barry said you're job depends on running a power rushing attack. Gary is all fancy-spread-it-around like. Don't know of too many ADs that have that level of control over a coach.
 
Wait a minute. Anderson won 73% of his games at Wisky, but he's 3-12 at Oregon State. How is that possible?

My understanding from numerous people on this board is coaches keep their same winning percentage when they change schools.
i-see-what-you-did-there_o_514831.gif
 
I get that he didn't like it there, but surely he could have lined up something better than Oregon St before telling Barry to piss off.
 
One of my neighbors is a buddy of Alvarez and confirmed the issue is micromanaging. Of course, my neighbor defends Barry and pointed out their success under him.
 
Seems like Wisconsin has been beyond consistent the last decade through the coaching changes. Alvarez is the kind of problem that seems to create a damn good program.
My thoughts exactly - The one constant through some pretty good years is Alvarez - especially on defense
 
Wait, I thought when you get a new coach and the team starts losing, you get to blame the previous staff for the losses. Only when the team starts winning again does the team record start being attributed to the new staff.
Good call... so in another year or two Riley will start to be very average once again and Anderson will light it up.

I will expect it to be that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO
That was the stated reason. No coach in their right mind is going to say the reason I am leaving is because the AD wants to coach the team from his suite above Camp Randall. Career suicide. I do believe the academics also played a factor, as well as the recruiting budget and the salary pool for the coaches.


We have a winner
 
That was the stated reason. No coach in their right mind is going to say the reason I am leaving is because the AD wants to coach the team from his suite above Camp Randall. Career suicide. I do believe the academics also played a factor, as well as the recruiting budget and the salary pool for the coaches.

Anderson is a good coach. He will do fine there.
 
I don't know about that...I thought he did pretty well at Utah State. Unless Aranda was with him there, I don't know.

Yep.

In fact, if LSU wanted to be bold, they would hire Aranda and just make sure he chooses a top notch Offensive Coordinator to take things a different direction on that side of the football.
 
Badger fan here. Season ticket holder for about 30 years now. Read this post and thought I would respond.

Anderson was basically hired when BB left because Barry was impressed with his team (Utah St) when they almost beat us earlier that year. He came in saying how he was going to keep everything the same - emphasis on the run, big offensive line, physical play on both sides of the ball. Recruit kids from Wisconsin and coach em up.

As he ran the program for two years, it became very clear to everyone he was not doing what he said he would, and he was not a match for our program.

1.) High school coaches around the state hated him. He never gave them the time of day and didn't recruit many Wisconsin kids.
2.) He wanted to change the program to more of a Baylor like offensive run and shoot. That didn't fit us. Alumni disliked him.
3.) He wanted to rebuild the program by recruiting JUCO transfers and other kids that couldn't get admitted to the school. We lost a ton of recruits who committed to us and then were denied admission due to grades. University administrators did not like him.
4.) He was not a very good coach in developing talent or managing games. The reason we won under him was leftover players from previous coaching staff.

An example of what I mean. If you watched the UW-Michigan game, you saw Michigan's DL dominate our offensive line. Our starters at the beginning of the year were three redshirt sophomores, redshirt freshman, and new transfer (junior eligibility). When Anderson got here, we were Offensive Lineman University. Beginning of last year the cupboard was bare and we had to start over (couple injuries hurt us too). It will be another 1 - 2 years until we are back where we were.

The only good thing he did here was hire Aranda - who is one hell of a coach. Had he not left he would have been fired the next year. It was not micro-managing or staff pay level, it was performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC_Lemming
Nice story.

We all have ways to justify or explain away our skeletons. Anderson was 11-3 played in the conference championship game in his second year improving on a 9-4 record the previous year, which was an improvement over the 8-6 team he inherited from Bielema.

If Alvarez wanted a coach that was going to run the type of offense Alavarez wanted (see my comment about coaching from the AD box at Camp Randall), then he should have hired that coach and not Andersen.

That would be like Eichorst hiring Tom Herman and saying I want you to run a pro style 2 RB 2 TE offense. What is the point?

Thank you for the Wisconsin company line
 
Nice story.

We all have ways to justify or explain away our skeletons. Anderson was 11-3 played in the conference championship game in his second year improving on a 9-4 record the previous year, which was an improvement over the 8-6 team he inherited from Bielema.

If Alvarez wanted a coach that was going to run the type of offense Alavarez wanted (see my comment about coaching from the AD box at Camp Randall), then he should have hired that coach and not Andersen.

That would be like Eichorst hiring Tom Herman and saying I want you to run a pro style 2 RB 2 TE offense. What is the point?

Thank you for the Wisconsin company line

Truly, Alvarez was not micro managing the football team. Anderson was taking it in a direction we did not want to go. That is why we do not have a lot of junior and senior talent on offense right now. We do on defense because Aranda was doing the recruiting.

I am not an Alvarez apologist either. He has made his share of mistakes and has a huge ego. Anderson was a mistake and he admitted it. We were fortunate to weather that hire as well as we did.
 
Truly, Alvarez was not micro managing the football team. Anderson was taking it in a direction we did not want to go. That is why we do not have a lot of junior and senior talent on offense right now. We do on defense because Aranda was doing the recruiting.

I am not an Alvarez apologist either. He has made his share of mistakes and has a huge ego. Anderson was a mistake and he admitted it. We were fortunate to weather that hire as well as we did.
Nice of you too post. Aranda has a lot of fans here, from comments over time.
 
Truly, Alvarez was not micro managing the football team. Anderson was taking it in a direction we did not want to go. That is why we do not have a lot of junior and senior talent on offense right now. We do on defense because Aranda was doing the recruiting.

I am not an Alvarez apologist either. He has made his share of mistakes and has a huge ego. Anderson was a mistake and he admitted it. We were fortunate to weather that hire as well as we did.

It's all good, but I stand by what I say if you hire a coach that runs a spread offense, why are you surprised when he runs a spread offense.

A direction we didn't want to go? Who is the "we"? The fans?

I tell you what if Riley goes 9-3 then 10-2 over then next two years running his pro style offense, then Nebraska fires him because he was running a pro style and dammit we wanted to run a spread. We don't run that kind of offense here. Then I will take your word for it.

Again thanks for the posting. I just believe you are keeping with the company line.
 
Badger fan here. Season ticket holder for about 30 years now. Read this post and thought I would respond.

Anderson was basically hired when BB left because Barry was impressed with his team (Utah St) when they almost beat us earlier that year. He came in saying how he was going to keep everything the same - emphasis on the run, big offensive line, physical play on both sides of the ball. Recruit kids from Wisconsin and coach em up.

As he ran the program for two years, it became very clear to everyone he was not doing what he said he would, and he was not a match for our program.

1.) High school coaches around the state hated him. He never gave them the time of day and didn't recruit many Wisconsin kids.
2.) He wanted to change the program to more of a Baylor like offensive run and shoot. That didn't fit us. Alumni disliked him.
3.) He wanted to rebuild the program by recruiting JUCO transfers and other kids that couldn't get admitted to the school. We lost a ton of recruits who committed to us and then were denied admission due to grades. University administrators did not like him.
4.) He was not a very good coach in developing talent or managing games. The reason we won under him was leftover players from previous coaching staff.

An example of what I mean. If you watched the UW-Michigan game, you saw Michigan's DL dominate our offensive line. Our starters at the beginning of the year were three redshirt sophomores, redshirt freshman, and new transfer (junior eligibility). When Anderson got here, we were Offensive Lineman University. Beginning of last year the cupboard was bare and we had to start over (couple injuries hurt us too). It will be another 1 - 2 years until we are back where we were.

The only good thing he did here was hire Aranda - who is one hell of a coach. Had he not left he would have been fired the next year. It was not micro-managing or staff pay level, it was performance.

Well thought out post & thanks for stopping by. I'll be the one dressed in red when Mrs Sparky & I get to Camp Randal. Winking
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT