Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think he's finding that his B10 team lacks speed and talent compared to his first year AAC teamIm a huge fan of Frost. I have no doubt he will have success here, but yes he has to an extent. It didn't cost of any of the games. I think he is finding the level of coaching is a bit different than AAC
40 IQ boy joey trying to make a comeback, hilarious.Your post game is weak fry guy
You must be a rocket scientist to be able to figure that out. It is no secret this team is not built for what Frost wants to do. UCF was, hence quicker turn around.I think he's finding that his B10 team lacks speed and talent compared to his first year AAC team
Came across this articlehttps://247sports.com/Article/NFL-Draft-recruiting-rankings-go-hand-in-hand--117819292/ that was comparing how high school rankings translates to talent and eventually getting drafted. Obviously if you are getting drafted you had a pretty descent college career.
In short;
50-%60% of 5 stars are drafted
20-25% of 4 stars
5-7% of 3 stars
1-2% 2 stars
You have teams like Bama and Ohio St consistently getting top recruits and consistently being in the NC hunt.
Would be interesting to know over the last 10-15 years teams that have won a NC, where they have been ranked in recruiting years leading up to it. From my very quick estimation. I looks like many have had consistent top 10 recruiting classes leading up.
Hate to break it to ya... out yarding means squat... style, TOP, game control all negate it. In our last game what %of yds came after Purdue was on Coast, it at least the foot on the clutch to shift into coast? Lots of garbage yards vs PURDUE
1991 wallace 28thI think you need to take a look at this. In the 90-94 classes we averaged better than Top 20 classes over those 5 years.
https://sites.google.com/site/nebraskafootballhistory/recruiting
1991 wallace 28th
your right the recruiting in the years after matter also and looks a lot better, I just remember hearing that stat and remembered it. I hope you right about future recruiting.Yeah, I was looking at the 5-year period prior to ’94. I think you gotta look at 5 year periods to get a pretty good idea of recruiting for that team.
At any rate, I don't think we should have a problem recruiting in that 15 - 20 range.
We need better talent to win periodCame across this articlehttps://247sports.com/Article/NFL-Draft-recruiting-rankings-go-hand-in-hand--117819292/ that was comparing how high school rankings translates to talent and eventually getting drafted. Obviously if you are getting drafted you had a pretty descent college career.
In short;
50-%60% of 5 stars are drafted
20-25% of 4 stars
5-7% of 3 stars
1-2% 2 stars
You have teams like Bama and Ohio St consistently getting top recruits and consistently being in the NC hunt.
Would be interesting to know over the last 10-15 years teams that have won a NC, where they have been ranked in recruiting years leading up to it. From my very quick estimation. I looks like many have had consistent top 10 recruiting classes leading up.
And I hate to break it to you, but when you look at yards per carry and yards per play, those do tell us a lot. They simply tell us which team moved the ball better. Sure, with Purdue, they got up by a decent margin, so they were probably taking some air out of the ball. But we outyarded Purdue, Colorado, and Troy in terms of yards/play. We have just repeatedly shot ourselves in the foot with mistakes and penalties. No other way to say it. And those mistakes have cost us at least 2 wins.
Speaking of a meaningless stat, TOP is exactly that. Especially with up tempo offenses being a part of the equation.