I've gone through a lot of school in my day, guys. I currently work for a college. I can tell you that a degree from UCLA is on par with or better than a degree from USC, and that both are better than Nebraska. tOSU has more recently become a more prestigious diploma, but its more likely viewed as between Nebraska and those two California schools.
How much this matters to a football player, though, is anybody's guess. Some players frankly don't care about the education and just want to perfect their trade do not look at the academics very closely. That is a fair point, and supports the idea that maybe our college football programs need to more closely model the baseball farm system or the academy system used for soccer players in Europe and quit the notion of being so closely affiliated with academics.
On the other hand, some players really like the idea of finishing with a degree, particularly if they are the first in their families to graduate from college, come from a minority background that values education, or any other number of reasons (i.e., Richard Sherman, who has a Stanford degree and is also a highly successful NFL player).
In Nebraska's favor, I would say that we're a better-than-average public university with wonderful athletic tradition that does a good job of supporting our athletes, particularly if they have some deficiencies, in being successful and graduating if they choose to. On top of that, we're a great football program that regularly has our top players enter the NFL. So, we're not UCLA or USC, but as an overall college experience, we're pretty well rounded. On top of that, we recently joined the Big Ten, which has, outside of the Ivy League, the best academic reputation in America. That will only help to raise our profile over time.
Just my two cents.