Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup, the job is his..Originally posted by DCBloodRed:
Good technique, cool customer, squares to throw, etc.
JMHO.
Bush looked better in the second half but he had a couple of throws where if he would have put it up and let Tolbert go get it he would have had a TD. Instead on the one play he got picked.Originally posted by jlb321:
both armstrong and darlington look good ... bush not so much
very difficult to assess bush given he is with the 3rd team playing against the 1st team defense
Actually Broekemeier has made the best throws of all the QBs at this point.Originally posted by DCBloodRed:
Good technique, cool customer, squares to throw, etc.
JMHO.
We have several decent options it appears to me. The accuracy thing from both Bush and Stanton is concerning. Frankly, Broekemeier impressed me more with his progressions and throws than maybe anybody other than Darlington. Granted, it was garbage time but he still made some good throws and put the ball where it needed to be against coverage.Originally posted by NikkiSixx:
We don't really see any improvement from TA and both ZD and Bush have higher ceilings. I'd be fine if they start ZD from what we have seen today. Those 2 guys need lots of reps.
there were quite a few throws from the pocket in the 2nd half. I suspect not having to block our first team D line probably contributed to that. Broekemeier looked like a guy that you could trust to put in a game if we had an injury disasters at QB. Darlington had the best day of all the QBs it looked like to me but I'm not sure what D he was facing most of the time. Bush has some learnin to do.Originally posted by jlb321:
could not watch the game in its entirety ... from what I saw almost all the throws were from outside the pocket .... can someone comment on whether they saw many 5-7 step drops (or equivalent from the shotgun) with throws from the pocket
Please stop. Broekemeier was playing against guys we will probably never see....much like himself. TA will be the starter, second string will be between Bush and Darlington depending on the fall.Originally posted by NUSouth:
Agree. My rankings are darlington 1, broekemeier 2 and ta 3
Originally posted by huskerbr12:
Saw one spring practice.
TA
EVERYONE ELSE.
It's clear #6 gets reps because he's got some potential (arm strength and athleticism). Darlington is a coaches kid, has wonderful fundamentals and a cap gun. Man his ball floats. Ryker didn't have his best day, but I wonder if he's really penciled in as #2. Stanton must really be struggling
what's a cap gun?
oh and, your clear cut favorite took a knee in the endzone to give up a safety....i'll defer to benning as my spokesperson on the matter.... yikes ....Originally posted by huskerbr12:
Saw one spring practice.
TA
EVERYONE ELSE.
It's clear #6 gets reps because he's got some potential (arm strength and athleticism). Darlington is a coaches kid, has wonderful fundamentals and a cap gun. Man his ball floats. Ryker didn't have his best day, but I wonder if he's really penciled in as #2. Stanton must really be struggling.
Originally posted by timnsun:
Who is banning?
I didn't get to see the game, but the knee in the end zone... I'm thinking that a 2 year starter probably won't be doing something like that in a real game... Just a guess though.
If that's true, then I have my first big beef with this staff. Why waste precious practice snaps on someone who will not be allowed in the mix. Don't even assign him a locker if that is the case.Originally posted by Pennsyhusker:
According to HTO Darlington is not in the mix due to his concussion history. And I trust his information. So I do not think we should include Darlington as a possibility.
I believe the instructions from the coaches were "just don't take a safety" and TA heard "take a safety"Originally posted by wreckitralph:
Originally posted by timnsun:
Who is banning?
I didn't get to see the game, but the knee in the end zone... I'm thinking that a 2 year starter probably won't be doing something like that in a real game... Just a guess though.
benning...and he wasn't as nonchalant about it as yourself.... will add that I guess if coaches said "just take knee" that makes a little easier to swallow, but still...
This post was edited on 4/12 7:45 AM by wreckitralph
This post was edited on 4/12 7:46 AM by wreckitralph
You hit the nail on the head and this would be a head scratcher....HTO usually is spot on but I don't know if he 100% correct on this one.Originally posted by HuskerAlum92:
If that's true, then I have my first big beef with this staff. Why waste precious practice snaps on someone who will not be allowed in the mix. Don't even assign him a locker if that is the case.Originally posted by Pennsyhusker:
According to HTO Darlington is not in the mix due to his concussion history. And I trust his information. So I do not think we should include Darlington as a possibility.
I didn't remember him saying why he didn't think Darlington was in the mix. IMO if he's not in the mix its because of arm strength and consistency.Originally posted by scarletred:
You hit the nail on the head and this would be a head scratcher....HTO usually is spot on but I don't know if he 100% correct on this one.Originally posted by HuskerAlum92:
If that's true, then I have my first big beef with this staff. Why waste precious practice snaps on someone who will not be allowed in the mix. Don't even assign him a locker if that is the case.Originally posted by Pennsyhusker:
According to HTO Darlington is not in the mix due to his concussion history. And I trust his information. So I do not think we should include Darlington as a possibility.
Other than touch on short routes, TA's Achilles heel has always been his decision making........his short throws and footwork looked better. Decision making didn't.Originally posted by jlb321:
I believe the instructions from the coaches were "just don't take a safety" and TA heard "take a safety"Originally posted by wreckitralph:
Originally posted by timnsun:
Who is banning?
I didn't get to see the game, but the knee in the end zone... I'm thinking that a 2 year starter probably won't be doing something like that in a real game... Just a guess though.
benning...and he wasn't as nonchalant about it as yourself.... will add that I guess if coaches said "just take knee" that makes a little easier to swallow, but still...
This post was edited on 4/12 7:45 AM by wreckitralph
This post was edited on 4/12 7:46 AM by wreckitralph
Fair enough... I can see his point now instead of the concussion issue.... Arm strength would be his Achilles hill similar to Jake Rudock.Originally posted by dinglefritzI didn't say why he didn't think Darlington was in the mix. IMO if he's not in the mix its because of arm strength and consistency.You hit the nail on the head and this would be a head scratcher....HTO usually is spot on but I don't know if he 100% correct on this one.If that's true, then I have my first big beef with this staff. Why waste precious practice snaps on someone who will not be allowed in the mix. Don't even assign him a locker if that is the case.Originally posted by Pennsyhusker:
According to HTO Darlington is not in the mix due to his concussion history. And I trust his information. So I do not think we should include Darlington as a possibility.
Thank you for the moment of clarity. For goodness sakes, it's a spring game, people!Originally posted by huskerbux:
Please stop. Broekemeier was playing against guys we will probably never see....much like himself. TA will be the starter, second string will be between Bush and Darlington depending on the fall.Originally posted by NUSouth:
Agree. My rankings are darlington 1, broekemeier 2 and ta 3
Good point. I just assumed HTO thought Darlington was out of the mix because of concussions, since that was something he said a few months ago. But maybe it is because of arm strength. I don't know. All I know is that someone whose opinion is almost always correct on here (HTO) says Darlington is not in the mix.Originally posted by dinglefritz:
I didn't remember him saying why he didn't think Darlington was in the mix. IMO if he's not in the mix its because of arm strength and consistency.Originally posted by scarletred:
You hit the nail on the head and this would be a head scratcher....HTO usually is spot on but I don't know if he 100% correct on this one.Originally posted by HuskerAlum92:
If that's true, then I have my first big beef with this staff. Why waste precious practice snaps on someone who will not be allowed in the mix. Don't even assign him a locker if that is the case.Originally posted by Pennsyhusker:
According to HTO Darlington is not in the mix due to his concussion history. And I trust his information. So I do not think we should include Darlington as a possibility.
This post was edited on 4/12 11:32 AM by dinglefritz
I agree that he looked like m maybe the most natural QB out there.Originally posted by TarheelHuskerFan:
From what I saw his arm strength was sufficient. I loved watching him play. out of him bush and Armstrong he was the only one that went to his second third or fourth options. One play he sat in the pocket and he started on the wr to the very right and turned his head slowly til he found a wr on the very left of the field. Bush and Armstrong look down one wr and if he's not open they force it Anyways. It's almost like they panic and feel they need to get rid of it quickly. Darlington kept his cool and knew how long he had. He was great in the pocket. He showed he could scramble and also throw in the run. His mechanics were flawless. He should have had 3 tds but some we're dropped. Bush should have had 3 ints but they were dropped. Darlington didn't force anything. I know I've only seen one "practice" but from what I saw he is my clear cut favorite. If he wasn't an option because of concussion issues then they would have used less reps on him and he wouldn't have run the ball.
This post was edited on 4/12 12:59 PM by TarheelHuskerFan
Cap gun my ass. He doesn't have the zip that Tommy and AJ have, but he is far from weak. Taylor didn't have a live arm, and he was all conference. Decision making and accuracy is going to go a long way on who gets significant playing time. And about your comment on Ryker . . . you serious Clark?Originally posted by huskerbr12:
Saw one spring practice.
TA
EVERYONE ELSE.
It's clear #6 gets reps because he's got some potential (arm strength and athleticism). Darlington is a coaches kid, has wonderful fundamentals and a cap gun. Man his ball floats. Ryker didn't have his best day, but I wonder if he's really penciled in as #2. Stanton must really be struggling.
Ahhhh... You said it yourself, he doesn't have the zip of TA or AJ. Don't get me wrong, ZD looked good, but his ball floats and I don't think he can make all the throws that Riley and Langsdorf require. Maybe someday his arm will get stronger and he will be able to make the throws.
And yeah, I am serious, I do wonder if Ryker is #2. He didn't look good Saturday. However, the freshmen have flaws and if TA went down, I wonder if he'd be more reliable than he other 2. Riley himself said don't read into the order the guys played Saturday. Maybe that's bs, I don't know.
To me, TA is the starter going into the fall and the rest will sort themselves out over the summer and fall camp. Good battle for #2 and I hope someone emerges.
Originally posted by Lincoln100:Originally posted by huskerbr12Saw one spring practice.Cap gun my ass. He doesn't have the zip that Tommy and AJ have, but he is far from weak. Taylor didn't have a live arm, and he was all conference. Decision making and accuracy is going to go a long way on who gets significant playing time. And about your comment on Ryker . . . you serious Clark?TA
EVERYONE ELSE.
It's clear #6 gets reps because he's got some potential (arm strength and athleticism). Darlington is a coaches kid, has wonderful fundamentals and a cap gun. Man his ball floats. Ryker didn't have his best day, but I wonder if he's really penciled in as #2. Stanton must really be struggling.