RhuleI like Mullen as a coach. I just don't know that he would have been anymore successful than Rhule over the long haul. His Florida teams regressed each year, Mississippi St teams were mostly average and he was below .500 in the league and he only had 1 winning conference season. The SEC west was tough but his teams played a not so good Kentucky team every year in crossover and in at least 5 of his seasons there he played the 2 worst SEC east teams in crossover games or his record would have been further below .500.
That being written, I think he does well at UNLV
comparing their records at different schools is pointless. Mullen is a fine coach, but his Florida team went from 10-3 in year 1 to 5-6 in year 4 and he was fired. His Miss St teams were below .500 in the league and were quite frankly inconsistent fluctuating from 5 wins to 10 ten wins and back to 6 wins. With those results in Lincoln he could have been fired as Pelini was, but Pelini had a better record and more consistency.Rhule
career winning %: 0.508
bowl game winning %: 0.333
Mullen
career winning %: 0.628
bowl game winning %: 0.700
Yeah it's really a tossup
no it's not, its just inconvenient for you.comparing their records at different schools is pointless. Mullen is a fine coach, but his Florida team went from 10-3 in year 1 to 5-6 in year 4 and he was fired. His Miss St teams were below .500 in the league and were quite frankly inconsistent fluctuating from 5 wins to 10 ten wins and back to 6 wins.
Yeah I highly doubt Pelini could HC his way to 3 straight SEC Championships.With those results in Lincoln he could have been fired as Pelini was, but Pelini had a better record and more consistency.
He produced 3 top 15 teams at Florida. He at one point had Miss St. ranked as the #1 team in the country. When has Rhule ever come close to producing these results?I like Mullen as a coach. I just don't know that he would have been anymore successful than Rhule over the long haul. His Florida teams regressed each year, Mississippi St teams were mostly average and he was below .500 in the league and he only had 1 winning conference season. The SEC west was tough but his teams played a not so good Kentucky team every year in crossover and in at least 5 of his seasons there he played the 2 worst SEC east teams in crossover games or his record would have been further below .500.
That being written, I think he does well at UNLV
The Pelini comments were in reference to Mullen's record at Mississippi Stno it's not, its just inconvenient for you.
Rhule had an overall losing record against Big 12 opponents. He currently has an overall losing record against B1G opponents.
Take Rhule's best stretch as a head coach from 2015-2019 and it's still worse than Mullen's stop at either Miss St or Florida.
Yeah I highly doubt Pelini could HC his way to 3 straight SEC Championships.
He’s not that good of a coach. I remember how lovestruck some you clowns were with him.
And Mike Riley had Nebraska ranked as high #6. He was an awesome coach too, right?He produced 3 top 15 teams at Florida. He at one point had Miss St. ranked as the #1 team in the country. When has Rhule ever come close to producing these results?
It is especially when one coach took over a program with zero football success (Temple) and also took on a program with only 45 scholarship players left (Baylor) before this current transfer era.no it's not, its just inconvenient for you.
Well that's easy to do when you just up and leave any time there is a chance of that happening.Rhule's has never had a season where his win total was less than the previous season.
2 to 6 to 10 to 10 at Temple
1 to 7 to 11 at Baylor
5 to 6 at Nebraska
However, my point remains, there is nothing in Mullen's history that says he would do any better at Nebraska than Rhule has done nor bring Nebraska back from the dead.
Rhule took over a 4 win team with Temple and didn’t have a winning season til year 3.It is especially when one coach took over a program with zero football success (Temple) and also took on a program with only 45 scholarship players left (Baylor) before this current transfer era.
Yeah Mullen had it just as tough as Rhule did to start at Florida and Mississippi St.
Mullen *finished in the top 15 three years in a row.And Mike Riley had Nebraska ranked as high #6. He was an awesome coach too, right?
Yeah, they didn't finish in the Top 10. That's what matters.
Important to have fun teams to watch on Friday nights.UNLV has been fun to watch the last couple of years, hope Mullen can keep it rolling!
And Matt won 10 games by year 3 while it took Dan 6 years to have a 10 win season.Rhule took over a 4 win team with Temple and didn’t have a winning season til year 3.
Mullen took over a 4 win team with Miss. St and won 9 games by year 2. In the SEC.
You are simply not a serious person if you think Rhule accomplished more.
Hahaha, holy shit. What was the context behind that comment?Mullen *finished in the top 15 three years in a row.
Hopefully you understand the difference.
Wait a minute … this you?
Can I get a hip hip?!?!And Mike Riley had Nebraska ranked as high #6. He was an awesome coach too, right?
temple won more games in the 4 years leading up to Rhule getting there (30) than they did in the 4 years he was their coach (28).It is especially when one coach took over a program with zero football success (Temple)
Yup. Pretty even.temple won more games in the 4 years leading up to Rhule getting there (30) than they did in the 4 years he was their coach (28).
Bear Bryant, Nick Saban, Steve Spurrier.The Pelini comments were in reference to Mullen's record at Mississippi St
Mullen coached in 1 SEC championship game as a HC and lost that game. Who coached his way to 3 straight SEC titles?
In which conference? Surely you care about the context.And Matt won 10 games by year 3 while it took Dan 6 years to have a 10 win season.
Oh, you do. But it’s irrelevant. You know that where you finish is what matters, so your Mike Riley comment was stupid.Hahaha, holy shit. What was the context behind that comment?
They also switched conferences from the MAC to American in that time. Addazio went from 9 wins in the MAC to 4 wins in the Big East/ American. not all circumstances are equaltemple won more games in the 4 years leading up to Rhule getting there (30) than they did in the 4 years he was their coach (28).
Both the AAC and Big 12.In which conference? Surely you care about the context.
You're right, it was stupid. Just like your "Mullen had MSU at #1" comment.Oh, you do. But it’s irrelevant. You know that where you finish is what matters, so your Mike Riley comment was stupid.
#1 is very different from #6 and Miss St. carried that ranking much later in the season.And Mike Riley had Nebraska ranked as high #6. He was an awesome coach too, right?
MSU avg recruiting class ranking at that time was 31st. Mullen is simply better at competing against top teams. Are you interested in comparing wins against ranked opponents?Both the AAC and Big 12.
Not sure why the conference matters? Mullen had SEC talent to work with while competing against other SEC talent opponents while Rhule had AAC talent to work with while competing against other AAC talent opponents.
The Baylor accomplishment is much more impressive considering what he was walking in to.
Please quote the post of mine where I said that.You're right, it was stupid. Just like your "Mullen had MSU at #1" comment.
Absolutely. But it also took Mullen 6 whole years to crack the Top 10. It only took Mike Riley 2 years.#1 is very different from #6 and Miss St. carried that ranking much later in the season.
My bad. It was @oldjar07Please quote the post of mine where I said that.
We've tried that already with Osborne & the Huskers. You're incapable of having that type of conversation, so no. I have zero interest wasting my time with you, again, on that.Are you interested in comparing wins against ranked opponents?
About them finishing top 15? No that was factually correct