Not a frequent poster but enjoy reading all the thoughts on here. A question has come up in my mind lately that I cant get passed. Seems most agree with a lot of the criteria that should be used in our search for a new coach. Who that particular coach should be has been a wonderful debate but the criteria seems pretty much the same.
Proven P5 coach
Top Flight recruiter
Not a coordinator
Very high ceiling
You know the rest etc.
Many on here seem to really be pulling for MJ as the next head coach. However when the same criteria is used to evaluate him as is used on other potential candidates, he falls short. My question is why are we using different criteria for him? Don't get me wrong, I am not anti MJ in any way, in fact think he is a very viable choice. Just not sure about this criteria thing.
Proven P5 coach
Top Flight recruiter
Not a coordinator
Very high ceiling
You know the rest etc.
Many on here seem to really be pulling for MJ as the next head coach. However when the same criteria is used to evaluate him as is used on other potential candidates, he falls short. My question is why are we using different criteria for him? Don't get me wrong, I am not anti MJ in any way, in fact think he is a very viable choice. Just not sure about this criteria thing.