Corey Campbell is

[big red22]

i'm fine with walking it back to "there were signs it would be this way"

i vividly remember the 24 point collapse against Oklahoma in 2019. defeat was written all over Rhule's face in the 2nd half and it permeated into his team. that was when i realized he just isn't the type of coach who can stand in the fire and win big games that define the program's culture.

i'm open and hopeful to being proven wrong on that. next year's schedule looks to be much easier than this year's schedule, but frankly anything less than 8-9 wins would be a tremendous disappointment after 3 years.

I say 9 wins and one of those wins being Iowa and Rhule is safe

 

[thall_]

*incoherent ranting

i'll do it again for you, slower.

7/12 = 58%

58% is a bigger number than 50%.

hope this helps.

Nebraska outscored Ohio State by 11-8
Nebraska outscored Wisconsin 20-15

Those two games were as “culturally defining” as any. Especially given that Ohio state was #6 and and Wisconsin we became bowl eligible and finally beat them.

ouch. losing to Ohio State was culture defining for you? you must've loved Frost's 3-9 season.

 

[thall_]

Yeah and I clearly said “if all things are equal”. You need to truly stop cherry picking. Take an entire data set or sentence and then proceed to analyze it. That’s the crux of your problem

We are an average team. Led by a freshman QB and the youngest backfield in NCAA.

Thus it shouldn’t be unexpected that we were going to beat some teams in the second half and lose to some. Prob about half.

If any of those teams were led by Freshmen QBs they would have probably had similar numbers to Neb.

All im saying is to stop promoting a false narrative. If you want to complain about the second half against Iowa or Illinois then complain about those are their own outlier performance. But don’t say stuff like “this happens all the time” when the week before Iowa we outscored Wisconsin.

you don't know the meaning of the word outlier.

something that happened 7/12 times this years is not that.

you should really stop using words you don't understand.

"and im not allowing it" 🥴

 

[huskerfan66]

We were -19 in the 4th quarter + OT this season

Gotta stop

 

[Laner2]

You literally just cherry picked again when you just said “I don’t care that he pounded on Kansas, UTSA, Northern Iowa and UTEP” while conveniently leaving out “Texas, Oklahoma State, Kansas State, etc”.

You’re creating a narrative by purposely leaving out KEY details that completely invalidate your narrative.

Would literally be like me saying “TO barely beat teams in 1995 on the way to his National Title. I mean he only beat Wyoming by 14!” All while
Ignoring the fact that he destroyed everyone else.

That’s what you’re doing. And I’m coming in showing everyone that it’s just not true.

Rhule has enough issues to deal with. He doesn’t need false narratives being allowed to grow on message boards by posters that are simply making up the narrative despite the actual evidence.

And, no, I didn’t enjoy being shut out by Iowa. It didn’t make me feel good about Rhule or the team in general.

But that’s a seperate issue from your claim of Rhule having a history of collapse.

And yeah if I’m getting hung up on the word “collapse” it’s because you chose to use it and it’s factually wrong.

Now you’re retreating to “tends to lose the second half of ‘culture defining games’”. And you’re wrong there.

You cherry pick Iowa or Colorado and I can show these second half scores

Nebraska outscored Ohio State by 11-8
Nebraska outscored Wisconsin 20-15

Those two games were as “culturally defining” as any. Especially given that Ohio state was #6 and and Wisconsin we became bowl eligible and finally beat them.

You’re literally just showing data points to create a false narrative that does not exist. And I’m not allowing it.

I've got him on ignore, but I can promise you it's a troll. Don't waste any electrons on it.

 

[thall_]

He's another toad licker I have on ignore so I don't know why you're dunking on him but well done, sir. Carry on.

I've got him on ignore, but I can promise you it's a troll. Don't waste any electrons on it.

I've got this toad licker on ignore so I can only read your responses. Carry on, sir.

> puts me on ignore
> 3 posts about me in 2 days

 

[thall_]

Gotta stop

dont worry @HUSKERBILL, i'll take it from here:

no we don't, cuz it's not happening

and even if it is, it's not a big deal

and even if it is a big deal, it probably wont happen again

and even if it happens again, you shouldn't be looking at data like that

 

[king_kong_]

dont worry @HUSKERBILL, i'll take it from here:

no we don't, cuz it's not happening

and even if it is, it's not a big deal

and even if it is a big deal, it probably wont happen again

and even if it happens again, you shouldn't be looking at data like that

It’s not a big deal to be outscored in the 4th quarter and overtime?

LOL. Yea, okay.

 

[thall_]

It’s not a big deal to be outscored in the 4th quarter and overtime?

LOL. Yea, okay.

not at all

you're forgetting we played Ohio State close which really turned the culture around down the home stretch.

 

[HUSKERBILL]

i'll do it again for you, slower.

7/12 = 58%

58% is a bigger number than 50%.

hope this helps.

ouch. losing to Ohio State was culture defining for you? you must've loved Frost's 3-9 season.

You said “historically”. Then you brought up his 2019 as your first data set. I showed you that Rhules team scored MORE in the second half than his opponents. That was factual in 2019

If you want to say “Despite a history of out scoring his opponents in the second half of games, THIS SEASON Rhules team allowed more points in the second half than his opponents in 58% of the games” then we can agree.

Because that will be the first factually correct thing you’ve said in this thread.

 

[thall_]

You said “historically”. Then you brought up his 2019 as your first data set. I showed you that Rhules team scored MORE in the second half than his opponents. That was factual in 2019

If you want to say “Despite a history of out scoring his opponents in the second half of games, THIS SEASON Rhules team allowed more points in the second half than his opponents in 58% of the games” then we can agree.

Because that will be the first factually correct thing you’ve said in this thread.

i get it. you're fine with being 6-6 and squeaking by teams like Rice and Rutgers because you can hang your hat on "he almost beat Oklahoma and Ohio State."

super successful season for you to enjoy, i was personally pretty disappointed.

in summary, i was right and you're still on the way to figuring out why you're wrong.

 

[HUSKERBILL]

i get it. you're fine with being 6-6 and squeaking by teams like Rice and Rutgers because you can hang your hat on "he almost beat Oklahoma and Ohio State."

super successful season for you to enjoy, i was personally pretty disappointed.

in summary, i was right and you're still on the way to figuring out why you're wrong.

In summary you were wrong every time. I showed it with facts after you purposely left out the data (twice - nice try) that didn’t align with your made up historical statement.

I was disappointed with 6-6. Thought we should be 8-4 and would have been if we had a special teams coach worth a crap. We go 7-5 if he is even average.

If Rhule doesn’t fire Foley then you have every right to come on here and blow him up. I’ll help you hold the gas can.