ADVERTISEMENT

CFP committee could 'paralyze' bowl system with delayed Cotton Bowl bid

Sooner_or_Later

Redshirt Freshman
Oct 7, 2001
770
457
63
When Navy hosts Temple on Saturday for the American Athletic Conference title game, there will be a large contingent of bowl officials with a rather specific rooting interest.

"I don't want to be un-American," one bowl official said, "but nearly everyone in the bowl industry, quite frankly, is rooting against Navy."

That official technically isn't rooting against Navy, just what happens if Navy wins. That's because if Navy wins the American and is in contention for the Group of 5 bid in a New Year's Six bowl, the College Football Playoff selection committee could delay announcing the highest-ranked Group of 5 champion team until Dec. 10 when Navy plays Army, six days after its final rankings are revealed.

The domino effect on other bowls could "paralyze" the system, a source said.

Delaying the Group of 5's bid to the Cotton Bowl would affect many bowl games involving Group of 5 teams. Officials would have to delay placing teams in bowls without knowing whether a conference champion could get pulled up to the Cotton Bowl. Additionally, opponents in those bowl games wouldn't know whom they were playing in addition to the obvious logistic and financial issues involved with waiting another seven days before planning travel, buying tickets and other factors.

The bowl season begins Dec. 17 with five bowls -- all involving Group of 5 teams. Teams usually arrive to those bowl sites on Wednesday, Dec. 14, so those schools would have little more than a 72-hour turnaround between learning what bowls they are in and traveling to the sites. The short time frame would also likely affect fans' ability to travel and potentially hurt the communities hosting those games, sources said.

In Tuesday's rankings, Western Michigan, which plays for the MAC title Friday, was ranked No. 17, and Navy was only two spots back at No. 19.

"If the committee believes the result of the Army-Navy game could affect Navy's ranking and therefore its place in the playoff or its selection as the Group of 5 representative, only the pairings that affect Army and Navy would be delayed until after the Army-Navy game," College Football Playoff executive director Bill Hancock said.

Hancock would not specify how close in the rankings Navy and the next closest Group of 5 champion has to be to delay the decision.

Not only would a delay affect the Group of 5 teams, but it also would prohibit teams with 5-7 records that qualified with high academic progress rates from getting placed into a bowl until Dec. 10. That's because those teams are awarded bowl bids that couldn't be filled by bowl-eligible teams with a 6-6 record or better. The APR teams will be the last teams placed.

A Temple win against Navy on Saturday would eliminate the Midshipmen from Cotton Bowl contention and allow all of the bowl selections to be announced Sunday. If both Western Michigan and Navy win, sources say the rankings will be delayed.

Some say the nightmare scenario actually would be Western Michigan losing the MAC title game and Navy winning the American. Then the committee likely would have to wait for the Army-Navy result because it's unknown how far Navy would drop in the rankings after a loss to Army. Another Group of 5 champ could potentially pass the Midshipmen, including San Diego State or Wyoming in the Mountain West or Western Kentucky in Conference USA.

"The bottom line is if the rankings are delayed, it would be a disaster to the bowl system," a bowl official said.

In June 2015, the College Football Playoff changed its rules so that the final rankings would be delayed until after the Navy-Army game if it affected the playoff field or the Group of 5 bid.
 
Well, I was a bowl supporter under the old system. Since we've ruined the bowl system and almost all are meaningless these days I really don't care if this messes things up. They need to expand the playoffs to 8 teams asap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rchrisreade
Well, I was a bowl supporter under the old system. Since we've ruined the bowl system and almost all are meaningless these days I really don't care if this messes things up. They need to expand the playoffs to 8 teams asap.

NOOOOOOO!!!!

Ohio State Michigan would mean half as much if they did that. I prefer the winner take all scenario's the 4 team format allows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GammaxuvirHusker
Absolutely it should be expanded to 8 teams. A B1G Champion being shut out of the Playoff while 2 non-champions from the same league are in consideration. The possibility that Pac10, Big XII and B1G Champions are all shut out of the Playoff. Frankly I am also all for the chaos and calamity now that the Bowl System has been destroyed. It is just amazing to me that the BCS was supposed to fix the inequities and it failed. The CFB Playoff was supposed to fix the inequities and a mere few years in, it has failed. So long as the Eyeball Test remains the standard for determining who gets in and who does not, the Championship is arguably still being decided/affected by the board room and not on the field.
 
Western Michigan deserved to the in the playoff.
Yes and no.

I say yes because the CFP system is fundamentally flawed. I hope Western Michigan beats Ohio and the committee has to admit that there are three classes of FBS schools: Power 5 elites who get an extra benefit of a doubt, Power 5 non-elites, and non-Power 5. They won't admit it, but it will become even more glaringly obvious.

I say no because I don't think Western Michigan can compete with the teams currently under consideration for the playoff. Not that it's right, it's fundamentally unfair that there is no objective path for any team to win the national championship like there is in every other NCAA sport.

And by that I mean that the Power 5 should break off and form their own division. But that won't happen until their hand is forced through an anti-trust suit.

Because the playoff committee has put such an emphasis on strength of schedule, we are going to see fewer and fewer Power 5 schools (or at least those with playoff aspirations) scheduling non-conference games against the better Group of 5 schools simply to not give them a leg to stand on in strength of schedule. With the Big Ten prohibiting schools from playing FCS teams now, that's going to be harder for Big Ten schools to avoid.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT