You always reach out to them.
It's well known,iowa like I said, goes after guys already committed to another team.
Is that them beating their heads too? You cant rationalize one,then do the other.
Again, I think iowas sights are smaller, I see no one wanting to expand the numbers. I think having a well established staff is very advantageous and effective,like upiowa has, we've had that as well, and at a higher level, but back then, going after a Tommy Frazier, fighting off several other big teams, and winning, really you could say made the difference in winning a couple of championships and almost a third.
Moving up by winning, by having a sound and established staff is nice, but it is limited by that staff, just look at our slow regression or, kansas states static ability. Under snyder, who was a great coach, had solid coaches in his staff, created a coaching tree of his own, he didn't reach for the stars, and his record too showed it.
At Nebraska,we have the brand, it gives us a leg up, and even as poorly as our past staffs recruited after Osborne, we still recruited nationally, did a portion of the things that brought us to the top, but just not as vigorously as was needed under new staff, and Bo was given time, but his longevity didnt show this improvement, even though he was seasoned here,giving him that advantage,plus the brand, it never reached the level required.
I see that going on at iowa today, as the Big and iowa has improved its brand, yes, your recruiting will improve, as has every team in the Big has, but I see no changes in iowa to reach that next level.