Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What has everyone heard? Us or Iowa State? Any idea when a decision is coming? Missing on Reed and Simon, sure would be nice to get him onboard.
Yeah, 5.6 3 star is ridiculous on him. It’s only because he’s an Iowa high schooler. Put him out west or down south and he’s an easy 4 star.
Well, I think he was also injured his junior season so there wasn't a lot of film to evaluate. He's another guy that will end up either a 5.7 or 5.8.
Im hearing he is leaning towards Iowa st. Who really knows for sure. I think it is close. Although not sure why between Iowa St and Nebraska it would be close. Nebraska seems like the easy pick, granted Im bias.What has everyone heard? Us or Iowa State? Any idea when a decision is coming? Missing on Reed and Simon, sure would be nice to get him onboard.
Linebacker recruiting has been disappointing, especially for a 3-4 defense.My opinion is we need a bunch of LBs still, and after missing on Reed/Simon, it’s time to start loading up elsewhere. If Blaise can stay at OLB, that’s one, but need plenty more.
It’s early, but I’d love to see a couple jump on board sooner than later.
Well he is from Iowa, the last cb had it 75% to Iowa st but things can change really fastIm hearing he is leaning towards Iowa st. Who really knows for sure. I think it is close. Although not sure why between Iowa St and Nebraska it would be close. Nebraska seems like the easy pick, granted Im bias.
Linebacker recruiting has been disappointing, especially for a 3-4 defense.
Im hearing he is leaning towards Iowa st. Who really knows for sure. I think it is close. Although not sure why between Iowa St and Nebraska it would be close. Nebraska seems like the easy pick, granted Im bias.
Lol, you're not completely wrong, but I'm all ears about recruiting linebackers. I imagine you have a formula.Say what you want but the linebacker group, in my opinion, is the most important and the most difficult position to secure. You can have average DL who occupy blocks but may not get the greatest penetration but good LB's can clean up a lot of messes. The position, inside or out, requires great eyes, instincts, quickness and above average speed.
I think if you ask any coach at any level and finding really good LB's is a challenge.
Simply, we have got to somehow step up our game in getting some good to great LB's on this team.
True, but great linebackers can save your bacon. Get any combination of good/great or great/great and you're in business. We really haven't had either recently. Things are changingLol, you're not completely wrong, but I'm all ears about recruiting linebackers. I imagine you have a formula.
I am of the notion: a great line will make good linebackers look great.
True, but great linebackers can save your bacon. Get any combination of good/great or great/great and you're in business. We really haven't had either recently. Things are changing
I seem to remember we always had a hard time getting D ends for our 4-3, where we had Nebraska native walkons locking down the spots.
Arguably, our yesterday D ends are some of our OLBs today.
The size and athleticism combination is a hot ticket.
We have players, we have coaches, they can develope some of them, but we need to heavy bangers.
I think you make a good point about our defensive performance, of which there were only a few quarters/halves that we looked ok on that side of the ball last year.I won't be surprised if he ends up at Iowa st. . In the same way I wouldn't be surprised if we won a recruiting battle against Alabama for a wide receiver. The defense hasn't been good or even sound, for a long time...
I think you make a good point about our defensive performance, of which there were only a few quarters/halves that we looked ok on that side of the ball last year.
Defensively we should make a big step up this year, and that was much of the talk during spring ball too, but I think the results on the field do affect recruiting, both positively and negatively.
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the attacking defensive scheme personally, but it can be played well. I think Michigan State plays a similar style.I do not want to be a negative nellie but I will need to see it to believe it. We pretty much have the same guys this year as last with a few exceptions. Perhaps overall a bit more athletic. From my perspective last year we were taking chances and getting caught with poor angles, missed tackles and just plain being out of position. I was really frustrated when we would like up and nearly the entire middle of the field was wide open, QB's lick their chops when they see that. I don't know if it was a D that just was taking lots of chances to make the big play and cover up for lack of overall ability of just what but we are not very good and the stats bear that out.
Here's hoping this next year sees some positive changes, we certainly need them on that side of the ball. If we don't see improvement, it is going to be a long year, I don't care how good your O is. JMHO
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the attacking defensive scheme personally, but it can be played well. I think Michigan State plays a similar style.
I do not want to be a negative nellie but I will need to see it to believe it. We pretty much have the same guys this year as last with a few exceptions. Perhaps overall a bit more athletic. From my perspective last year we were taking chances and getting caught with poor angles, missed tackles and just plain being out of position. I was really frustrated when we would like up and nearly the entire middle of the field was wide open, QB's lick their chops when they see that. I don't know if it was a D that just was taking lots of chances to make the big play and cover up for lack of overall ability of just what but we are not very good and the stats bear that out.
Here's hoping this next year sees some positive changes, we certainly need them on that side of the ball. If we don't see improvement, it is going to be a long year, I don't care how good your O is. JMHO
So, since RG, name all of our DEs.Really? I seem to recall the opposite. We have had some tremendous DE's go through the system in old days of the 4-3.
When Mick went down,or played injured, our D line was undermanned.I do not want to be a negative nellie but I will need to see it to believe it. We pretty much have the same guys this year as last with a few exceptions. Perhaps overall a bit more athletic. From my perspective last year we were taking chances and getting caught with poor angles, missed tackles and just plain being out of position. I was really frustrated when we would like up and nearly the entire middle of the field was wide open, QB's lick their chops when they see that. I don't know if it was a D that just was taking lots of chances to make the big play and cover up for lack of overall ability of just what but we are not very good and the stats bear that out.
Here's hoping this next year sees some positive changes, we certainly need them on that side of the ball. If we don't see improvement, it is going to be a long year, I don't care how good your O is. JMHO
Why is it that when we return a huge number of offensive players, that those player are going to be automatically better? Then when we return a huge number of defensive players, the comments are more like, well they sucked last year they are probably going to suck again this year.
Do only offensive players get better? Is it because Frost is an offensive coach?
We have a redshirt freshman, often injured, former TE turned center, that is going to be a freshman All-American at Center, but there is absolutely no chance any defensive players get better. They sucked last year, they suck again this year.
Just an observation.
Probably because folks don't have much faith in Chins but have an abundance of faith in Frost.
Why is it that when we return a huge number of offensive players, that those player are going to be automatically better? Then when we return a huge number of defensive players, the comments are more like, well they sucked last year they are probably going to suck again this year.
Do only offensive players get better? Is it because Frost is an offensive coach?
We have a redshirt freshman, often injured, former TE turned center, that is going to be a freshman All-American at Center, but there is absolutely no chance any defensive players get better. They sucked last year, they suck again this year.
Just an observation.
Right, I think Frost and his offense has a history of success, so people just assume if we are getting returning guys it can only get better. So far the D side of the ball has been nothing special. Not just last year but under Chin in general even at UCF. So I think people are a bit more hesitant to get excited about the defense no matter who is returning. D needs to step up.Probably because folks don't have much faith in Chins but have an abundance of faith in Frost.
Why is it that when we return a huge number of offensive players, that those player are going to be automatically better? Then when we return a huge number of defensive players, the comments are more like, well they sucked last year they are probably going to suck again this year.
Do only offensive players get better? Is it because Frost is an offensive coach?
We have a redshirt freshman, often injured, former TE turned center, that is going to be a freshman All-American at Center, but there is absolutely no chance any defensive players get better. They sucked last year, they suck again this year.
Just an observation.
Right, I think Frost and his offense has a history of success, so people just assume if we are getting returning guys it can only get better. So far the D side of the ball has been nothing special. Not just last year but under Chin in general even at UCF. So I think people are a bit more hesitant to get excited about the defense no matter who is returning. D needs to step up.