Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and so it isOriginally posted by little a:
I hear nothing about their NFL prospects---
Agree. Physically talented kid.Originally posted by Blackshirt316:
Anyone who thinks Jake Cotton can't play needs to go back and watch him against Miami. Cotton almost dinglehandedly made Denzel Perran look like a highschool linebacker in that game and was a HUGE reason we dominated their front 7.
Don't know if he will get a shot to play at the next level but it has nothing to do with talent.
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
Nice postOriginally posted by ReuniteGondwanaland:
Cotton has NFL OG level power and physicality and adequate agility and feet. He lacks consistency, does tend to bad penalties, and has some injury history.
CBS has him here as the #47 OG, number 808 overall NFL prospect. Virtually no chance he gets drafted, but I'd be surprised if somebody doesn't call him quickly after the draft. He has pro potential and with the right coaching and motivation he could possibly make it. Somebody will try to unlock his potential.
Mark Pelini gave it his all as a very undersized walk-on. He was 3-time academic all-conference so he should be well prepared for a future that doesn't involve the NFL.
What is your point? That this is a fresh start for Cav and we should wait and see what happens?Originally posted by 500mileRadius:
Cav is really excited to be here and he seems to show the proper respect for our history. Not sure what people expect at this point?
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Sarcasm aside, 2/50 = 4%, not 2%. And while I understand that we live in a "what have you done for me lately" society, but Cav also had a 1st Team Pac 12 OL in each of the four years prior to your five year window, which paints a different picture than your post.Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?
Considering the talent that USC, UCLA, Oregon and to a lesser extent ASU, UW and Zona get, it's amazing that Caz had any 1st or 2nd team all conference guys at Oregon State. EVERY pundit I have listened to or read talk about him being not a good Oline coach but a GREAT one.Originally posted by Ecktacy:
Sarcasm aside, 2/50 = 4%, not 2%. And while I understand that we live in a "what have you done for me lately" society, but Cav also had a 1st Team Pac 12 OL in each of the four years prior to your five year window, which paints a different picture than your post.Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?
Would Jake have done better under Cav? No idea. I actually liked Garrison as a coach and think he has a very bright future. But your selective stats are (1) incorrect, and (2) paint a worse picture than reality.
What I do know is that Cav didn't have a lot of guys with Jake's ceiling, and when he did, they were often 1st team All-Conference. Hopefully he can bring in more studs at a better school. I know I like what I've seen of him so far, as do some of his key recruits.
It was actually 2% of the fifty spots which is 1 player...a second teamer.Originally posted by Ecktacy:
Sarcasm aside, 2/50 = 4%, not 2%. And while I understand that we live in a "what have you done for me lately" society, but Cav also had a 1st Team Pac 12 OL in each of the four years prior to your five year window, which paints a different picture than your post.Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?
Would Jake have done better under Cav? No idea. I actually liked Garrison as a coach and think he has a very bright future. But your selective stats are (1) incorrect, and (2) paint a worse picture than reality.
What I do know is that Cav didn't have a lot of guys with Jake's ceiling, and when he did, they were often 1st team All-Conference. Hopefully he can bring in more studs at a better school. I know I like what I've seen of him so far, as do some of his key recruits.
I hope that is the case.Originally posted by dinglefritz:
Considering the talent that USC, UCLA, Oregon and to a lesser extent ASU, UW and Zona get, it's amazing that Caz had any 1st or 2nd team all conference guys at Oregon State. EVERY pundit I have listened to or read talk about him being not a good Oline coach but a GREAT one.Originally posted by Ecktacy:
Sarcasm aside, 2/50 = 4%, not 2%. And while I understand that we live in a "what have you done for me lately" society, but Cav also had a 1st Team Pac 12 OL in each of the four years prior to your five year window, which paints a different picture than your post.Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?
Would Jake have done better under Cav? No idea. I actually liked Garrison as a coach and think he has a very bright future. But your selective stats are (1) incorrect, and (2) paint a worse picture than reality.
What I do know is that Cav didn't have a lot of guys with Jake's ceiling, and when he did, they were often 1st team All-Conference. Hopefully he can bring in more studs at a better school. I know I like what I've seen of him so far, as do some of his key recruits.
Like my post stated, it was actually 2 players: Issac Seumalo (2010 2nd Team).Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
It was actually 2% of the fifty spots which is 1 player...a second teamer.Originally posted by Ecktacy:
Sarcasm aside, 2/50 = 4%, not 2%. And while I understand that we live in a "what have you done for me lately" society, but Cav also had a 1st Team Pac 12 OL in each of the four years prior to your five year window, which paints a different picture than your post.Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?
Would Jake have done better under Cav? No idea. I actually liked Garrison as a coach and think he has a very bright future. But your selective stats are (1) incorrect, and (2) paint a worse picture than reality.
What I do know is that Cav didn't have a lot of guys with Jake's ceiling, and when he did, they were often 1st team All-Conference. Hopefully he can bring in more studs at a better school. I know I like what I've seen of him so far, as do some of his key recruits.
Dead serious. You don't think it's possible that Cav's coaching could have been any better than what Jake received under the previous regime? Give the guy a chance!Originally posted by Tulsa Tom:
Ummmmm...are you serious?Originally posted by kchu5ker555:
How would Jake had fared with a few years of Cav's coaching?
In the last five years Cav's line has taken exactly 0% of the first team all conference spots.
When you combine 1st and 2nd team all conference over the last five years, Cav's players have taken 2% of the all-conference spots.
Cav's coaching?