MIT Researchers Admit Anti-Maskers Are More Scientifically Rigorous"At the same time the academics admit, almost in a puzzled fashion, that these “anti-maskers” do their investigations in a very scientific manner. “Indeed,” the paper claims, “anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”
The MIT academics go on to admit that those opposed to masks are not afraid to get down and dirty in looking at statistics, nor are they afraid to increasingly question the media and government authorities, a trait MIT researchers call “a weaponization of critical thinking.” Even more surprising is the revelation that anti-maskers’ “approach to the pandemic is grounded in a more scientific rigor, not less.”"
A new paper finds MIT academics admitting the scientificbased nature of their antimask opponents, leaving one to wonder which side is engaging in science and which is engaging in propaganda
PS - can't wait till libs and RINOs get a hold of this one....lol...