I’m not sure what you mean....
Theres only two ways I can be wrong.
1) In what I’ve read about B1G parameters, which I could be, and this is why I asked. It seems it has already been pointed out that there is a technicality regarding team sitting, although my scenario with Oklahoma could easily pan out, as 5% is such a small number. But I digress.
2) If the B1G changes and thus admits it was too strict. This could conceivably happen, and is more likely after the election, but if they were to come out and say that while it still matters then I will admit I was wrong. Or, if it’s proven that 33% of athletes will have heart trouble.
Teams never testing over 5% won’t prove me wrong, it’ll be more of a “lucked out” moment. It wont prove or disprove anything.
The start date is just too far out and it took them to long. Trams who are ready should get to play if they wish, and even you have to admit that 21 days sitting and 5% is crazy stupid.